Abstract
The zinc finger-containing transcription factor Gli3 is a key mediator of Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway. In vertebrates, Gli3 has widespread expression pattern during early embryonic development. Along the anteroposterior axes of the central nervous system (CNS), dorsoventral neural pattern elaboration is achieved through Hh mediated spatio-temporal deployment of Gli3 transcripts. Previously, we and others uncovered a set of enhancers that mediate many of the known aspects of Gli3 expression during neurogenesis. However, the potential role of Gli3 associated enhancers in trait evolution has not yet received any significant attention. Here, we investigate the evolutionary patterns of Gli3 associated CNS-specific enhancers that have been reported so far. A subset of these enhancers has undergone an accelerated rate of molecular evolution in the human lineage in comparison to other primates/mammals. These fast-evolving enhancers have acquired human-specific changes in transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs). These human-unique changes within subset of Gli3 associated CNS-specific enhancers were further validated as single nucleotide polymorphisms through 1000 Genome Project Phase 3 data. This work not only infers the molecular evolutionary patterns of Gli3 associated enhancers but also provides clues for putative genetic basis of the population-specificity of gene expression regulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) signaling cascade is one of the intricate signal transduction mechanism that is conserved among vertebrates and invertebrates and participates in multiple distinct developmental processes including ventralization of central nervous system (CNS) and anterior/posterior patenting (A-P) of the limbs (Allahyari et al. 2019; Tickle and Towers 2017; Symmons et al. 2016). In invertebrate animals, like Drosophila and C. elegans Shh signaling is mediated by zinc-finger containing DNA-binding protein Cubitus interruptus (Ci) (Methot and Basler 2001). Vertebrates have achieved the additional complexity in Shh signaling pathway through ancient gene duplication events that had created the three homologous copies of Ci like ancestral gene, i.e., Gli1, Gli2, and Gli3 (Karlstrom et al. 2003). During the course of vertebrate evolution, three Gli paralogs (Gli1, Gli2, and Gli3) have acquired some of the distinct features of their ancestral gene Ci (Abbasi et al. 2009). For instance, Gli2 and Gli3 proteins preserved transcriptional bi-functionality present in their Drosophila homolog Ci (Aoto et al. 2002). In contrast, Gli1 appears to function only as transcriptional activator and its role in embryonic development is widely reported as dispensable (Mill et al. 2003).
Among Gli proteins, Gli3 has dynamic expression pattern and unique characteristics features during early embryonic development and postnatally (Tyurina et al. 2005). It has both a repressor and an activator domain and could in principle function both as transcriptional activator and repressor (Hu et al. 2006). For instance, Gli3xt mice have polydactyly (Bai et al. 2004) and dorsal central nervous system defects, associated with ectopic Shh expression (Haddad-Tóvolli et al. 2015), suggesting Gli3 plays a role in both transducing and repressing Shh signals (Veistinen et al. 2012). Moreover, genetic analysis in mice revealed that Gli3 null mutants die before birth with defects in several tissues including brain, spinal cord, limbs, craniofacial skeleton, vertebrae, lungs, and other internal organs (Cao et al. 2013). Mutations of GLI3 gene in human causes a variety of dominant developmental defects syndromes conjointly referred to as “GLI3 morphaphathies” (Abbasi et al. 2007), including Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome (GCPS) (Vortkamp et al. 1992), Pallister-Hall syndrome (PHS) (Böse et al. 2002), preaxial polydactyly type IV (PPD-IV), and postaxial polydactyly type A (PAPA) (Memi et al. 2018). In addition to craniofacial anomalies with intellectual disability and mental retardation (Kalff-Suske et al. 1999; Biesecker 2006; Démurger et al. 2015), all these GLI3 morphaphathies also depict congenital malformations of autopod with distinct preaxial, postaxial, and syndactyly phenotypes (Démurger et al. 2015)
Biochemical, molecular, animal model and human disease data demonstrates that correct expression of Gli3 is crucial to ensure appropriate deployment of Shh signaling pathway for normal embryogenesis in vertebrates (Abbasi et al. 2007; Karlstrom et al. 2003). Precise expression of a typical developmental gene in vertebrates is governed by non-coding cis-regulatory DNA sequences that often reside within close proximity or hundreds of kilobase pairs (Kbp) away from the concerned gene body (Davis et al. 2016; Leal and Cohn 2017). Previously we and others have identified a number of conserved non-coding elements (CNEs) in intronic and intergenic genomic regions of human GLI3 gene (Abbasi et al. 2013; Coy et al. 2011). These GLI3 associated CNEs when tested in in vivo and in vitro models, acted as tissue and developmental stage specific enhancers (Abbasi et al. 2007; Coy et al. 2011; Alvarez-Medina et al. 2008).
Mutations in enhancer modules can potentially affect the normal availability of associated gene transcripts during embryogenesis (Ali et al. 2016). For instance, deletion of Gli3 limb specific enhancers (mm1179/hs1586) has significantly reduced the Gli3 expression in the embryonic hand plate and exhibits forelimb specific polydactyly (Osterwalder et al. 2018). A recent study has systematically investigated the functional impact of single nucleotide mutagenesis in one of the best-characterized enhancer elements, the zone of polarizing activity regulatory sequence (ZRS) (Kvon et al. 2020). The ZRS is a limb specific enhancer of the Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) gene and is located at an extreme physical distance (of nearly one million base pairs) from its target promoter (Johnson et al. 2014). ZRS is active in the posterior margin of developing fore- and hind limb buds, where it controls digit number and identity (Al-Qattan et al. 2012). Kvon and colleagues reported that 71% of single nucleotide mutations in ZRS enhancer drives abnormal reporter gene expression in the limbs (Kvon et al. 2020). An investigation of human specific substitutions in a neuro-developmental enhancer interval of FZD8 in transgenic mice assay suggests the vital role of non-coding variations in evolving human brain size (Boyd et al. 2015). Over the last two decades, a comprehensive catalog of independently acting cis-regulators, governing dynamic aspects of endogenous GLI3 expression during vertebrate development has been characterized by employing in vitro and in vivo models. However, to best of our knowledge, the crucial roles of GLI3 associated enhancers in developmental trait evolution, in particular central nervous system (CNS) evolution have not received any significant attention.
In the present study we have investigated the pattern of polymorphism and divergence of Gli3 associated functionally confirmed CNS-specific enhancer modules. We have characterized among them a subset of enhancers with an accelerated rate of sequence divergence in human lineage. Among these positively selected enhancers, we found an assorted set of putative TFBSs, possessing human unique single nucleotide polymorphisms. This work not only reveals the molecular evolutionary patterns of Gli3 associated CNS specific enhancers, but also providing hints for the putative genetic basis of population specificity of gene expression regulation.
Materials and methods
GLI3 associated functionally confirmed CNS-specific enhancers
We initiated our search for GLI3 associated functionally confirmed central nervous system (CNS) enhancers through literature searches (Abbasi et al. 2007; Coy et al. 2011; Alvarez-Medina et al. 2008) and VISTA enhancer browser (Visel et al. 2007). Among the previously reported GLI3 associated functionally confirmed and independently acting 19 tissue specific cis-regulatory modules, we shortlisted nine CNS-specific enhancers for further investigations (Fig. 1).
GLI3 associated central nervous system associated enhancer intervals. Human GLI3 gene is located on chromosome 7; its genomic coordinates and its graphical representation of exons and introns are depicted on the top panel. Black boxes represent the coding exons and functionally confirmed CNS specific enhancers are shown as vertical red bars. The upstream intergenic region is represented by horizontal green line. Enhancers are the non-coding genomic regions that regulate the Gli3 expression during CNS development. Enhancers depicted in this figure have been characterized previously through functional experiments in several species including human cell lines, mice, zebrafish, and chicken. The corresponding studies reporting the expression pattern of respective enhancer elements in brain and spinal cord are given in the bibliographic section. CNE, conserved non-coding element; CNS, central nervous system; Mb, midbrain; Hb, hindbrain; Fb, forebrain; Sc, spinal cord. Figures of transgenic mice and transgenic zebrafish expressing reporter genes (lacZ and GFP respectively) under the influence of GLI3 associated CNS-specific enhancers were adopted from Abbasi et al. (2010), Coy et al. (2011), and Anwar et al. (2015)
Estimation of signatures of selection
To estimate signatures of selection on selected subset of GLI3 associated enhancers, previously described methodology by Moon and colleagues was employed (Moon et al. 2019). The unphased VCF (Variant Call Format) files of human GLI3 gene (Chr7: 42,000,548-42,277,469/GRCH37) were downloaded from 1000 Genome Browser phase 3. The downloaded VCF files were then computed through VCF tools (Danecek et al. 2011) and PopGenome (R package) (Pfeifer et al. 2014) to calculate Tajima’s D and mean FST values for each of the enhancer region. To measure the signatures of selection on individual polymorphic sites of GLI3 associated CNS specific enhancers, we adopted the strategy of Schaschl et al. (2015) that aimed to capture signatures of positive selection on individual polymorphic sites (Schaschl et al. 2015). Methodology devised by Schaschl and colleagues includes three approaches, FDIST, BayeScan and extended Lewontin and Krakauer test (FLK). Firstly, FDIST (fixation index (FST) vs expected heterozygosity (He)) calculation was done in program LOSITON (Looking for Selection in a Tangled Dataset) (Antao et al. 2008). Secondly, we used the Bayesian statistical approach, implemented in the program BayeScan, that detect the outlier loci under selection (Foll 2012). We included an additional approach to verify the SNPs detected under the positive selection by FDIST and BayeScan, the “Lewontin and Krakauer test (FLK)” (Bonhomme et al. 2010). FLK test calculations were performed using hapFLK and P values were computed as explained in the software documentation (Fariello et al. 2013). The SNPs corresponding to P value of 0.05 or less were considered significant, having the signatures of positive selection (Bonhomme et al. 2010).
Prediction of allele specific transcription factor binding motifs
Transcriptional factor binding sites (TFBSs) were predicted using de novo motif discovery tool AliBaba 2.1, based on the TRANSFAC database (Grabe 2002). The resultant TFBSs were then confirmed via literature for their role in brain development and were cross checked with the list of 142 brain-specific TFs collected from MGI and Human Protein Atlas by Zehra and Abbasi (Zehra and Abbasi 2018).
Haplotype level analysis
To better characterize the polymorphism of human specific positively selected SNPs in human populations, haplotypic analyses were performed following the methodology of Sabeti and colleagues (Sabeti et al. 2002). Unphased VCF files of human GLI3 gene were converted to phased haplotype files using fast PHASE with default settings (Scheet and Stephens 2006). In order to generate analysis that highlights the segregating alleles to be under the influence of positive selection in certain population, extended haplotype homozygosity (EHH) plot and bifurcation diagrams were generated through package “rehh” (version 2.0) (Gautier and Vitalis 2012).
Results
Detection of signatures of selection on GLI3 associated CNS specific enhancers
From the literature survey, a total of nine Gli3 associated CNS-specific enhancers were shortlisted (Abbasi et al. 2007; Coy et al. 2011; Alvarez-Medina et al. 2008) (Fig. 1). Majority of these nine CNS- specific enhancers are embedded within intronic intervals of Gli3, one in each introns 1, 3, 4, and 11 and two elements in each of introns 2, and 9, whereas only one enhancer region was positioned in the upstream intergenic interval of Gli3 (Fig. 1). To emphasize the physical positioning of enhancer contents, we schematize the entire map of human GLI3 containing locus that depicts intron-exon structure, conservation depth of enhancers, methods for their functional testing and activity domains in CNS (Fig. 1).
To determine the evolutionary rate with which the human GLI3 associated CNS-specific enhancer intervals evolved during the course of human evolution, we estimated the Tajima’s D and fixation index (FST) (Table 1) following the previous methodology used by Moon and co-workers (Moon et al. 2019). Because of ascertainments bias of Tajima’s D and FST towards common polymorphism, following the previous methodologies we chose P ≤ 0.05 as cut-off criterion for significance (Fariello et al. 2013; Korneliussen et al. 2013; Schaschl et al. 2015). Among the analyzed subset of enhancers, values of mean FST and Tajima’s D for CNE1 (Tajima’s D = −0.53, FST = 0.13), and HCNR4 (Tajima’s D = −1, FST = 0.23) with significant P value of 0.02 and 0.003 respectively is indicative of significant signatures of recent positive selection (Table 1). However, Tajima’s D and mean FST values for HCNE1, Mm652, CNE2, CNE6, CNE9, CNE11, and CNE13 failed to reject neutrality with non-significant P values (Table 1). The positional information, number of SNPs, mean FST, and Tajima’s D for each human GLI3 CNS specific enhancers are illustrated in Table 1.
It has been suggested that, when positive selection is acting on an enhancer region, there is likely to be negative selection simultaneously acting on the surrounding region therefore, scanning such genomic regions for signatures of positive selection will yield false negative results (Fariello et al. 2013; Capellini et al. 2017). To avoid this problem, selection on individual polymorphic sites was evaluated (Table 2). For this reason, we adopted the strategy of Schaschl et al. (2015) that aimed to capture signatures of positive selections on individual polymorphic sites both as a result of hard and soft selection sweep (Schaschl et al. 2015). SNP data of the human CNS specific GLI3 enhancers for twenty-six human populations belonging to five super populations (Africa, Europe, East Asia, South Asia, and America) was downloaded from the 1000 Genome Browser phase 3 (Auton et al. 2015). SNPs with low MAF score were filtered out, a quality control step implemented in genomic studies (Malomane et al. 2018). Methodology devised by Schaschl and colleagues includes three approaches, FDIST, BayeScan, and extended Lewontin and Krakauer test (FLK). A genomic position under observation can be classified as directional if P ≤ 0.05 for FDIST (Schaschl et al. 2015). FDIST analysis revealed that SNP rs3801232 (FST = 0.15, P = 0.004) within CNE1 and SNP rs17640804 (FST = 0.20, P = 0.004) positioned within HCNR4 are significantly deviating from the neutrality, which might suggest that these two SNPs are under positive selection. Similarly, based on FDIST values it can be inferred that SNP rs28458974 within CNE6 of GLI3 is evolving under balancing selection (FST = 0, P = 0.053). To further verify these FDIST based results, next we employed the Bayesian statistical approach which assumes that genetic differentiation among populations in different environment is different for the loci that are under significant directional pressure (Fischer et al. 2011). This approach scan for SNPs under selection by decomposing FST into population specific component, the Bayes Factor (BF) and locus specific component alpha (α) (Nielsen et al. 2018). A loci is considered under positive selection, if log10(BF) >1.5 and ((α) = 0.91 → 0.97) (Foll 2012). The SNP rs3801232 within GLI3 associated CNE1 depicts BayeScan log10(BF) = 2.39 and ((α = 0.93), whereas the SNP rs17640804 residing within HCNR4 depicts log10(BF) = 1.7 and ((α = 0.96) providing strong evidence that both of these SNPs filtered earlier by FDIST analysis are under positive selection (Table 2). However, BayeScan did not confirm the signatures of balancing selection on SNP rs28458974 within CNE6 (Fig. 2). To further validate the FDIST and BayeScan based data, an additional approach, “extended Lewontin and Krakauer test (FLK),” was employed (Table 2). FLK test statistics revealed that SNP rs17640804 within HCNR4 and SNP rs3801232 within CNE1 are evolving under positive selection with significant P value, i.e., 0.034 and 0.041 respectively (Table 2).
Selective outlier loci in the human GLI3 gene associated CNS-specific enhancers using FDIST and BayeScan. (A) Depicts FDIST analysis. It evaluates the relationship between fixation index (FST) and expected heterozygosity (He), describing the expected distribution of FST vs He (FDIST) under an island model of migration with neutral markers. Value of heterogenicity (expected) HE is shown along x-axis while the y-axis represents the fixation index (FST) values. The red area indicates positive selection, gray area neutrality, and yellow area balancing selection. SNPs are represented as blue dots. According to FDIST analysis, SNP rs3801232 (chr7:42213714-42213714) within CNE1 and SNP rs17640804 (chr7:42091791-42091791) positioned within HCNR4 are significantly deviating from the neutrality, which might suggest that these two SNPs are under positive selection (falling in the red zone). Similarly, based on FDIST interpretations, it can be inferred that SNP rs28458974 (chr7:42012170-42012170) within GLI3 associated CNS-specific enhancer region CNE6 is evolving under balancing selection (falling in the yellow zone). (B) Results of BayeScan algorithm for identification of outlier loci with significantly higher or lower genetic differentiation than expected under neutrality. The q value of a given locus is the minimum FDR (false discovery rate). The vertical dotted line represents the threshold FDR = −1.5 and the red dots indicate the SNPs in the GLI3 gene associated CNS-specific enhancers. SNPs on the right side of the vertical dotted line are putatively under positive selection
Prediction of Allele specific transcription factor binding motifs
FDIST, BayeScan and FLK statistics reveals positive selection on SNP rs17640804 within HCNR4 and SNP rs3801232 within CNE1. To gauge whether these positively selected SNPs are unique to human, a comparative analysis was performed by employing orthologous sequences from human, other mammals, birds, and fish (Supplementary file: Figure S1). Careful inspection of multiple sequence alignments revealed that rs17640804 and rs3801232 are unique to human lineage (Supplementary file: Figure S1). The SNPs rs3801232 (chr7: 42131390, GRCh37/hg19) within human GLI3 CNS-specific enhancer CNE1 carries cytosine (C) residues until teleost fish (Supplementary file; Figure S1). However, in modern human, this cytosine residue is replaced by thymine (T) (Supplementary file: Figure S1A). The substitution of thymine (T) by cytosine (C) in human DNA segment leads to the creation of a novel binding site for the transcription factor SP1 (Fig. 3). Transcriptional factor SP1 is known to express widely in the mammalian CNS and participates in memory and oxidative stress in brain (Ryu et al. 2003; Eppig et al. 2015).Co-immunoprecipitation data suggests that SP1 functions by recruiting the basal TF machinery and by affecting the chromatin state (O’Connor et al. 2016). An example of SP1 based regulation of gene expression, is the previously reported cooperation between SP1 and p300 during neuronal differentiation, where both of these proteins cooperatively activate the p21 promoter to bring about withdrawal of the progenitor neural cells from cell cycle (Chuang et al. 2016). Single nucleotide polymorphism can alter the binding affinity of SP1 transcription factor (Zhang et al. 2009). Hata and colleagues demonstrated that the genomic fragment of AGTRL1 gene having the “G” allele of the SNP rs9943582 has much higher binding affinity for SP1 and, consequently, higher enhancer activity than that of “A” allele (Hata et al. 2007). Previously, a functional “T” to “G” polymorphism at nucleotide 309 in the promoter region of the MDM2 gene (rs2279744) has been identified, which results in the enhancement for binding affinity of SP1 transcription factor (Onat et al. 2006). The SNP rs17640804 (chr7: 42131390, GRCh37/hg19) within HNCR4 possesses cytosine (C) residues that is evolutionarily conserved until birds (Supplementary file: Figure S1B). In modern human lineage this cytosine (C) residue is replaced by thymine (T) (Supplementary file: Figure S1). This single nucleotide change in humans leads to the creation of binding sites for Activating transcription factors 2 (ATF2) (Fig. 3). ATF2 is a member of the activator protein-1 family of transcription factors and is highly expressed in human brain and lever (Pearson et al. 2005). Neuronal cell proliferation and differentiation, learning, memory, synaptic plasticity and some other neuropathological conditions are known to be modulated by ATF 2 transcription factor (Yang et al. 2019). Consistent with the diversity of cellular processes reported to be transcriptionally regulated by ATF2, the number of disease pathologies associated with alterations in ATF2 are also numerous. For instance, the altered expression and phosphorylation state of ATF2 has been associated with neurogenerative pathologies (Watson et al. 2017). Similarly, Xu and colleagues also demonstrated the role of ATF2 in Schizophrenia and depression in Northern Chinese Hans population (Xu et al. 2020).
Effects of SNPs on transcription factor binding sites. (A) Comparison between the ancestral allele “C” and derived allele “T” of polymorphism rs3801232 within CNE1. The substitution of thymine (T) by cytosine (C) in human DNA segment leads to the creation of new binding site for the transcription factor SP1. (B) Depicts the comparison between the ancestral allele “C” and derived allele “T” of rs17640804 within HCNR4 for the putative transcription factor binding sites. This single nucleotide change in humans leads to the creation of binding sites for activating transcription factors 2 (ATF2). Seq: the input sequence length for TFBSs analysis. Start: depict the starting position of the transcription factor binding motifs. End: ending position of the transcription factor binding motifs. Arrowhead: the position of the SNP is shown by a red arrowhead
Haplotypic analysis of SNP rs3801232 and rs17640804
The allelic frequency spectrum of positively selected SNPs rs3801232 and rs17640804 within the human GLI3 associated CNS-specific enhancers is different in different human populations (Supplementary file: Figure S2). For instance, the frequency of ancestral allele “C” for SNP rs3801232 is highest in African population (68%) and least in East Asian (32%) (Supplementary file: Figure S2). Therefore, to investigate whether the selected alleles (rs3801232 and rs17640804) has approached or achieve fixation in one population but remains polymorphic in the remaining human populations, we performed haplotypic analyses, following the methodology of Sabeti and colleagues (Sabeti et al. 2002). They used the extended haplotype homozygosity (EHH) approach along with the haplotype bifurcation diagram to identify regions in the human genome that are being under positive selection in different human populations (Sabeti et al. 2002; Fariello et al. 2013). In our case, extended haplotype homozygosity (EHH) plot and bifurcation diagrams for SNP rs3801232 (Fig. 4A) and rs17640804 (Fig. 4B) across different human populations (America, East Asia, South Asia, Europe and Africa) indicates that the derived alleles “T” for rs3801232 and rs17640804 are segregating under the clear influence of positive selection (then their respective ancestral counterpart), in all human populations analyzed except Africa (Fig. 4 A and B).
Extended haplotype homozygosity (EHH) plot and bifurcation diagrams for SNPs rs3801232 and rs17640804. EHH plots showing the homozygosity of the most frequent extended haplotype around the SNP rs3801232 and rs17640804 in the panel (A) and (B) respectively. The vertical dotted line in EHH plot depicts the position of the SNP. X-axis of the EHH plot shows the upstream and downstream genomic coordinates from the locus of interest. Homozygosity scale is shown on the y-axis, ranging from 0 to 1 (0 implying no homozygosity and 1 complete homozygosity). The five vertical panels depict different human populations (Africa, America, East Asia, Europe, South Asia, and Africa). Haplotype bifurcation diagrams in panel (A) and (B) showing breakdown of linkage disequilibrium in individuals carrying the ancestral and derived allele of the polymorphism rs3801232 and rs17640804 respectively. It is bidirectional with the root representing a core SNP depicted by a vertical dotted line. Thickness of the line corresponds to the number of individuals in a population with shared haplotype. Each vertical panel shows the bifurcation pattern for SNP rs3801232 and rs17640804 in different human populations (Africa, America, East Asia, Europe, South Asia, and Africa)
Discussion
The accurate, precise and robust regulation of gene expression during development is crucial for the normal functioning of cellular events pertaining to cellular homeostasis and differentiation (Burgess 2016; Long et al. 2016). The majority of variants affecting such diverse cellular processes reside outside protein coding regions (Carullo and Day 2019). It has been suggested that ~ 90% of common variants associated with complex human traits do not affect a protein directly but instead reside within cis-regulatory circuits that control gene expression (Ward and Kellis 2016). Therefore, to fully comprehend the disease and evolutionary relevance of the non-coding portion of human genome, it is quintessential to understand the role of non-coding variants in altering the developmental genes expression (Nishizaki et al. 2019.)
The non-coding cis-acting enhancers that regulate mammalian Gli3 gene expression during CNS development have been characterized through functional experiments in several species including human cell lines, mice, zebrafish, and chicken (Abbasi et al. 2007; Coy et al. 2011; Alvarez-Medina et al. 2008) (Fig. 1). Given the fact that GLI3 has been implicated in several disease phenotypes, embryonic development and various cancers types, human specific regulation of this gene might have profound evolutionary implications (Matissek and Elsawa 2020). However, to best of our knowledge, the potential significance of human GLI3 associated non-coding cis-regulators in developmental trait evolution, in particular central nervous system (CNS) evolution have not received enough attention.
Among the functionally characterized set of CNS-specific GLI3 cis-regulators, the CNE1 and HCNR4 were found to show the signatures of positive selection (Fig. 2 A and B). Both of these enhancers possess single nucleotide polymorphisms which are unique to modern human lineage (Supplementary file: Figure S1). It is well known that single nucleotide substitutions within mammalian enhancers often result in the creation or removal of TFBSs, causing alteration in gene expression patterns (Douglas and Hill 2014). For instance, Prabhakar and colleagues have reported, gain of an additional TFBS due to human specific substitutions in the conserved non-coding enhancer element of cut-like homeobox (CUX1) gene, known to have a role in autism (Prabhakar et al. 2006). It has been shown that non-coding substitutions within TFBSs of this enhancer might impact the expression patterns of the concerned gene body (CUX1) (Levchenko et al. 2018). These findings were further corroborated by Zehra and Abbasi (2018). They reported human specific modifications in SOX2, RUNX, and FOS/JUND binding sites within brain exclusive human accelerated enhancers (Zehra and Abbasi 2018). In line with these expectations, we observed that SNPs within CNE1 and HCNR4 (of GLI3) have led to the creation of putative novel binding sites for transcriptional factors SP1 and Activating transcription factors 2 (ATF2) respectively (Fig. 3 A and B). Conceivably, evolution of novel TFBSs might have altered the spatiotemporal deployment of GLI3 transcripts within human CNS, possibly leading to the evolutionary elaboration of human brain. Therefore, the discovery of positively selected nucleotide residues within a subset of GLI3 associated enhancers offer an exciting opportunity to directly implicate GLI gene family members in developmental trait evolution through further experimental work.
Allelic frequency spectrum of SNPs rs3801232 and rs17640804 within CNE1 and HCNR4 (of GLI3) is different among different human populations (America, East Asia, South Asia, Europe and Africa) (Supplementary file: Figure S2). Natural selection may act to increase the frequency of de-novo beneficial mutations (Deng and Xu 2017). However, the standing genetic variants, those which have been segregating in a population for some time, have also been observed to undergo selection regime and thereby known to contribute to several phenotypic adaptations (Capellini et al. 2017). For instance, evolutionary loss of pelvis structures in freshwater stickleback populations has been associated with mutations that inactivate the fin specific enhancer for the Pitx1 gene (Chan et al. 2010). These Pitx1 associated regulatory substitutions showed signatures of positive selection in pelvic reduced stickleback populations (Coyle et al. 2007). Similarly, the population genetics experiments revealed tremendous diversity of traits among modern human populations, e.g., from lactase persistent to skin pigmentations (Deng and Xu 2017). Much of this trait diversity in human populations arose from genetic adaptations to different environmental pressures (Hancock et al. 2010). However, our findings that SNPs within subset of GLI3 enhancers have undergone positive selection in non-African human populations require further validations. It could be due to many different and non-mutually exclusive reasons, such as variations in the demography, difference in pattern of linkage disequilibrium and different rates of adaptations (Capellini et al. 2017). For instance, the promoter region of a gene that encodes the precursor of opioid neuropeptide (PDYN) exhibits a significant degree of population differentiation between human populations, which is suggestive of local adaptions (Moon et al. 2019). Similarly, patterns of variations in the regulatory region of human LCT gene that confer lactase persistence in African are consistent with the action of selective sweep (Hancock et al. 2010).
Conclusion
To assess the interspecific and intraspecific pattern of genetic variations in functionally characterized GLI3 associated CNS-specific enhancers, the present study integrates various selection and rate analysis approaches and information from the 1000 genome project. A subset of GLI3 associated CNS-specific enhancers was found to evolve under positive selection in all human populations analyzed except Africa. In this subset of positively selected GLI3 associated CNS-specific enhancers, the single nucleotide polymorphisms led to the changes in transcriptional factor binding sites. Evolution of TFBSs, in pre-existing enhancers may allow a gene to acquire a novel expression patterns without compromising the ancestral expressions/functions (Wong et al. 2017). Therefore, the results of this study open avenues for further studies aimed at understanding the possible roles of GLI3 associated enhancers in brain evolution and inter-population variability of gene expression in humans.
Data availability
All the data provided here is correct to the best of our knowledge. If any further details are needed, will be provided.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abbasi AA, Paparidis Z, Malik S, Goode DK, Callaway H, Elgar G, Grzeschik KH (2007) Human GLI3 intragenic conserved non-coding sequences are tissue-specific enhancers. PLoS One 2:e366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000366
Abbasi AA, Goode DK, Amir S, Grzeschik K-H (2009) Evolution and functional diversification of the GLI family of transcription factors in vertebrates. Evol Bioinformatics Online 5:5–13. https://doi.org/10.4137/ebo.s2322
Abbasi AA, Paparidis Z, Malik S, Bangs F, Schmidt A, Koch S, Lopez-Rios J, Grzeschik KH (2010) Human intronic enhancers control distinct sub-domains of Gli3 expression during mouse CNS and limb development. BMC Dev Biol 10:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-10-44
Abbasi AA, Minhas R, Schmidt A, Koch S, Grzeschik KH (2013) Cis-regulatory underpinnings of human GLI3 expression in embryonic craniofacial structures and internal organs. Develop Growth Differ 55:699–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/dgd.12076
Ali S, Amina B, Anwar S, Minhas R, Parveen N, Nawaz U, Azam SS, Abbasi AA (2016) Genomic features of human limb specific enhancers. Genomics 108:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2016.08.003
Allahyari RV, Clark KL, Shepard KA, Garcia ADR (2019) Sonic Hedgehog signaling is negatively regulated in reactive astrocytes after forebrain stab injury. Sci Rep 9:565. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37555-x
Al-Qattan MM, Al Abdulkareem I, Al Haidan Y, Al Balwi M (2012) A novel mutation in the SHH long-range regulator (ZRS) is associated with preaxial polydactyly, triphalangeal thumb, and severe radial ray deficiency. Am J Med Genet A 158A:2610–2615. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.35584
Alvarez-Medina R, Cayuso J, Okubo T, Takada S, Marti E (2008) Wnt canonical pathway restricts graded Shh/Gli patterning activity through the regulation of Gli3 expression. Dev Camb Engl 135:237–247. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.012054
Antao T, Lopes A, Lopes RJ, Beja-Pereira A, Luikart G (2008) LOSITAN: A workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics 9:323. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-323
Anwar S, Minhas R, Ali S, Lambert N, Kawakami Y, Elgar G, Azam SS, Abbasi AA (2015) Identification and functional characterization of novel transcriptional enhancers involved in regulating human GLI3 expression during early development. Develop Growth Differ 57:570–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/dgd.12239
Aoto K, Nishimura T, Eto K, Motoyama J (2002) Mouse GLI3 regulates Fgf8 expression and apoptosis in the developing neural tube, face, and limb bud. Dev Biol 251:320–332. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2002.0811
Auton A, Abecasis GR, Altshuler DM et al (2015) A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15393
Bai CB, Stephen D, Joyner AL (2004) All mouse ventral spinal cord patterning by Hedgehog is Gli dependent and involves an activator function of Gli3. Dev Cell 6:103–115
Biesecker LG (2006) What you can learn from one gene: GLI3. J Med Genet 43:465–469. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2004.029181
Bonhomme M, Chevalet C, Servin B, Boitard S, Abdallah J, Blott S, SanCristobal M (2010) Detecting selection in population trees: the Lewontin and Krakauer test extended. Genetics 186:241–262. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.117275
Boyd JL, Skove SL, Rouanet JP, Pilaz LJ, Bepler T, Gordân R, Wray GA, Silver DL (2015) Human-chimpanzee differences in a FZD8 enhancer alter cell-cycle dynamics in the developing neocortex. Curr Biol CB 25:772–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.041
Böse J, Grotewold L, Rüther U, (2002) Pallister-Hall syndrome phenotype in mice mutant for Gli3. Hum Mol Genet 11:1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/11.9.1129
Burgess DJ (2016) Regulatory elements: putting enhancers into context. Nat Rev Genet 17:377. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.74
Cao T, Wang C, Yang M, Wu C, Wang B (2013) Mouse limbs expressing only the Gli3 repressor resemble those of Sonic Hedgehog mutants. Dev Biol 379:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.04.025
Capellini TD, Chen H, Cao J, Doxey AC, Kiapour AM, Schoor M, Kingsley DM (2017) Ancient selection for derived alleles at a GDF5 enhancer influencing human growth and osteoarthritis risk. Nat Genet 49:1202–1210. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3911
Carullo NVN, Day JJ (2019) Genomic enhancers in brain health and disease. Genes 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10010043
Chan YF, Marks ME, Jones FC, Villarreal G, Shapiro MD, Brady SD, Southwick AM, Absher DM, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Myers RM, Petrov D, Jonsson B, Schluter D, Bell MA, Kingsley DM (2010) Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science 327:302–305. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182213
Chuang J-Y, Kao T-J, Lin S-H, Wu AC, Lee PT, Su TP, Yeh SH, Lee YC, Wu CC, Chang WC (2016) Specificity protein 1-zinc finger protein 179 pathway is involved in the attenuation of oxidative stress following brain injury. Redox Biol 11:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2016.11.012
Coy S, Caamaño JH, Carvajal J et al (2011) A novel Gli3 enhancer controls the Gli3 spatiotemporal expression pattern through a TALE homeodomain protein binding site▿. Mol Cell Biol 31:1432–1443. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00451-10
Coyle SM, Huntingford FA, Peichel CL (2007) Parallel evolution of Pitx1 underlies pelvic reduction in Scottish threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J Hered 98:581–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esm066
Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST, McVean G, Durbin R, 1000 Genomes Project Analysis Group (2011) The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27:2156–2158. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
Davis A, Reubens MC, Stellwag EJ (2016) Functional and comparative genomics of Hoxa2 gene cis-regulatory elements: evidence for evolutionary modification of ancestral core element activity. J Dev Biol 4:15
Démurger F, Ichkou A, Mougou-Zerelli S, Le Merrer M, Goudefroye G, Delezoide AL et al (2015) New insights into genotype-phenotype correlation for GLI3 mutations. Eur J Hum Genet 23:92–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2014.62
Deng L, Xu S (2017) Adaptation of human skin color in various populations. Hereditas 155:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-017-0036-2
Douglas AT, Hill RD (2014) Variation in vertebrate cis-regulatory elements in evolution and disease. Transcription 5:e28848. https://doi.org/10.4161/trns.28848
Eppig JT, Richardson JE, Kadin JA, Ringwald M, Blake JA, Bult CJ (2015) Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI): reflecting on 25 years. Mamm Genome 26:272–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-015-9589-4
Fariello MI, Boitard S, Naya H, SanCristobal M, Servin B (2013) Detecting signatures of selection through haplotype differentiation among hierarchically structured populations. Genetics 193:929–941. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.147231
Fischer MC, Foll M, Excoffier L, Heckel G (2011) Enhanced AFLP genome scans detect local adaptation in high-altitude populations of a small rodent (Microtus arvalis). Mol Ecol 20:1450–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05015.x
Foll M (2012) BayeScan v2. 1 User manual. Ecology 20:1450–1462
Gautier M, Vitalis R (2012) rehh: an R package to detect footprints of selection in genome-wide SNP data from haplotype structure. Bioinformatics 28:1176–1177. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts115
Grabe N (2002) AliBaba2: context specific identification of transcription factor binding sites. In Silico Biol 2:S1–S15
Haddad-Tóvolli R, Paul FA, Zhang Y et al (2015) Differential requirements for Gli2 and Gli3 in the regional specification of the mouse hypothalamus. Front Neuroanat 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2015.00034
Hancock AM, Alkorta-Aranburu G, Witonsky DB, Di Rienzo A (2010) Adaptations to new environments in humans: the role of subtle allele frequency shifts. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:2459–2468. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0032
Hata J, Matsuda K, Ninomiya T, Yonemoto K, Matsushita T, Ohnishi Y, Saito S, Kitazono T, Ibayashi S, Iida M, Kiyohara Y, Nakamura Y, Kubo M (2007) Functional SNP in an Sp1-binding site of AGTRL1 gene is associated with susceptibility to brain infarction. Hum Mol Genet 16:630–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddm005
Hu MC, Mo R, Bhella S, Wilson CW, Chuang PT, Hui CC, Rosenblum ND (2006) GLI3-dependent transcriptional repression of Gli1, Gli2 and kidney patterning genes disrupts renal morphogenesis. Development 133:569–578. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02220
Johnson EJ, Neely DM, Dunn IC, Davey MG (2014) Direct functional consequences of ZRS enhancer mutation combine with secondary long range SHH signalling effects to cause preaxial polydactyly. Dev Biol 392:209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.05.025
Kalff-Suske M, Wild A, Topp J, Wessling M, Jacobsen E-M, Bornholdt D et al (1999) Point Mutations Throughout the GLI3 Gene Cause Greig Cephalopolysyndactyly Syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 8:1769–1777. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/8.9.1769
Karlstrom RO, Tyurina OV, Kawakami A, Nishioka N, Talbot WS, Sasaki H, Schier AF (2003) Genetic analysis of zebrafish gli1 and gli2 reveals divergent requirements for gli genes in vertebrate development. Development 130:1549–1564. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00364
Korneliussen TS, Moltke I, Albrechtsen A, Nielsen R (2013) Calculation of Tajima’s D and other neutrality test statistics from low depth next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 14:289. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-289
Kvon EZ, Zhu Y, Kelman G et al (2020) Comprehensive in vivo interrogation reveals phenotypic impact of human enhancer variants. Cell 180:1262–1271.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.031
Leal F, Cohn MJ (2017) Developmental, genetic, and genomic insights into the evolutionary loss of limbs in snakes. Genesis 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.23077
Levchenko A, Kanapin A, Samsonova A, Gainetdinov RR (2018) Human accelerated regions and other human-specific sequence variations in the context of evolution and their relevance for brain development. Genome Biol Evol 10:166–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evx240
Long HK, Prescott SL, Wysocka J (2016) Ever-changing landscapes: transcriptional enhancers in development and evolution. Cell 167:1170–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.018
Malomane DK, Reimer C, Weigend S, Weigend A, Sharifi AR, Simianer H (2018) Efficiency of different strategies to mitigate ascertainment bias when using SNP panels in diversity studies. BMC Genomics 19:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4416-9
Matissek SJ, Elsawa SF (2020) GLI3: a mediator of genetic diseases, development and cancer. Cell Commun Signal 18:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-020-00540-x
Memi F, Zecevic N, Radonjić N (2018) Multiple roles of Sonic Hedgehog in the developing human cortex are suggested by its widespread distribution. Brain Struct Funct 223:2361–2375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1621-5
Methot N, Basler K (2001) An absolute requirement for Cubitus interruptus in Hedgehog signaling. Development 128:733–742
Mill P, Mo R, Fu H, Grachtchouk M, Kim PC, Dlugosz AA, Hui CC (2003) Sonic Hedgehog-dependent activation of Gli2 is essential for embryonic hair follicle development. Genes Dev 17:282–294. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1038103
Moon JM, Capra JA, Abbot P, Rokas A (2019) Signatures of recent positive selection in enhancers across 41 human tissues. G3 Genes Genomes Genetics 9:2761–2774. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400186
Nielsen ES, Henriques R, Toonen RJ, Knapp ISS, Guo B, von der Heyden S (2018) Complex signatures of genomic variation of two non-model marine species in a homogeneous environment. BMC Genomics 19:347. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4721-y
Nishizaki SS, Ng N, Dong S et al (2019) Predicting the effects of SNPs on transcription factor binding affinity. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz612
O’Connor L, Gilmour J, Bonifer C (2016) The role of the ubiquitously expressed transcription factor Sp1 in tissue-specific transcriptional regulation and in disease. Yale J Biol Med 89:513–525
Onat OE, Tez M, Ozçelik T, Törüner GA (2006) MDM2 T309G polymorphism is associated with bladder cancer. Anticancer Res 26:3473–3475
Osterwalder M, Barozzi I, Tissières V, Fukuda-Yuzawa Y, Mannion BJ, Afzal SY, Lee EA, Zhu Y, Plajzer-Frick I, Pickle CS, Kato M, Garvin TH, Pham QT, Harrington AN, Akiyama JA, Afzal V, Lopez-Rios J, Dickel DE, Visel A, Pennacchio LA (2018) Enhancer redundancy allows for phenotypic robustness in mammalian development. Nature 554:239–243. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25461
Pearson AG, Curtis MA, Waldvogel HJ, Faull RLM, Dragunow M (2005) Activating transcription factor 2 expression in the adult human brain: association with both neurodegeneration and neurogenesis. Neuroscience 133:437–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.02.029
Pfeifer B, Wittelsbürger U, Ramos-Onsins SE, Lercher MJ (2014) PopGenome: an efficient Swiss army knife for population genomic analyses in R. Mol Biol Evol 31:1929–1936. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu136
Prabhakar S, Noonan JP, Pääbo S, Rubin EM (2006) Accelerated evolution of conserved noncoding sequences in humans. Science 314:786. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130738
Ryu H, Lee J, Zaman K, Kubilis J, Ferrante RJ, Ross BD, Neve R, Rattan RR (2003) Sp1 and Sp3 Are Oxidative Stress-Inducible, Antideath Transcription Factors in Cortical Neurons. J Neurosci 23:3597–3606. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.23-09-03597.2003
Sabeti PC, Reich DE, Higgins JM, Levine HZP, Richter DJ, Schaffner SF, Gabriel SB, Platko JV, Patterson NJ, McDonald GJ, Ackerman HC, Campbell SJ, Altshuler D, Cooper R, Kwiatkowski D, Ward R, Lander ES (2002) Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419:832–837. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01140
Schaschl H, Huber S, Schaefer K, Windhager S, Wallner B, Fieder M (2015) Signatures of positive selection in the cis -regulatory sequences of the human oxytocin receptor (OXTR) and arginine vasopressin receptor 1a (AVPR1A) genes. BMC Evol Biol 15:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0372-7
Scheet P, Stephens M (2006) A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am J Hum Genet 78:629–644
Symmons O, Pan L, Remeseiro S, Aktas T, Klein F, Huber W, Spitz F (2016) The Shh topological domain facilitates the action of remote enhancers by reducing the effects of genomic distances. Dev Cell 39:529–543
Tickle C, Towers M (2017) Sonic Hedgehog signaling in limb development. Front Cell Dev Biol 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2017.00014
Tyurina OV, Guner B, Popova E, Feng J, Schier AF, Kohtz JD, Karlstrom RO (2005) Zebrafish Gli3 functions as both an activator and a repressor in Hedgehog signaling. Dev Biol 277:537–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.10.003
Veistinen L, Takatalo M, Kesper DA et al (2012) Deletion of Gli3 in mice causes abnormal frontal bone morphology and premature synostosis of the interfrontal suture. Front Physiol 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00121
Visel A, Minovitsky S, Dubchak I, Pennacchio LA (2007) VISTA Enhancer Browser—a database of tissue-specific human enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D88–D92. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl822
Vortkamp A, Franz T, Gessler M, Grzeschik KH (1992) Deletion of GLI3 supports the homology of the human Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome (GCPS) and the mouse mutant extra toes (Xt). Mamm Genome 3:461–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00356157
Ward LD, Kellis M (2016) HaploReg v4: systematic mining of putative causal variants, cell types, regulators and target genes for human complex traits and disease. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D877–D881. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1340
Watson G, Ronai ZA, Lau E (2017) ATF2, a paradigm of the multifaceted regulation of transcription factors in biology and disease. Pharmacol Res 119:347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2017.02.004
Wong ES, Schmitt BM, Kazachenka A, Thybert D, Redmond A, Connor F, Rayner TF, Feig C, Ferguson-Smith AC, Marioni JC, Odom DT, Flicek P (2017) Interplay of cis and trans mechanisms driving transcription factor binding and gene expression evolution. Nat Commun 8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01037-x
Xu F-L, Yao J, Wu X, Xia X, Xing JX, Xuan JF, Liu YP, Wang BJ (2020) Association analysis between SNPs in the promoter region of RGS4 and schizophrenia in the Northern Chinese Han population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 16:985–992. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S250282
Yang S-C, Liu J-J, Wang C-K, Lin YT, Tsai SY, Chen WJ, Huang WK, Tu PWA, Lin YC, Chang CF, Cheng CL, Lin H, Lai CY, Lin CY, Lee YH, Chiu YC, Hsu CC, Hsu SC, Hsiao M, Schuyler SC, Lu FL, Lu J (2019) Down-regulation of ATF1 leads to early neuroectoderm differentiation of human embryonic stem cells by increasing the expression level of SOX2. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol 33:10577–10592. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201800220RR
Zehra R, Abbasi AA (2018) Homo sapiens-specific binding site variants within brain exclusive enhancers are subject to accelerated divergence across human population. Genome Biol Evol 10:956–966. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy052
Zhang D, Ma J, Brismar K, Efendic S, Gu HF (2009) A single nucleotide polymorphism alters the sequence of SP1 binding site in the adiponectin promoter region and is associated with diabetic nephropathy among type 1 diabetic patients in the Genetics of Kidneys in Diabetes Study. J Diabetes Complicat 23:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.05.004
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan for supporting this research through Indigenous Ph.D. fellowship, grant no.315-4672-2BS3-053, awarded to Irfan Hussain.
Funding
This work was supported by Indigenous Ph.D. fellowship awarded to Irfan Hussain by Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AAA conceived the project. AAA and RZR designed the experiments. IH, SA, MA, and RZR performed the experiments. IH, AAA, RZR, SA, and MA analyzed the data. AAA and IH wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Caroline Brennan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(PDF 1.00 mb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hussain, I., Raza, R.Z., Ali, S. et al. Molecular signatures of selection on the human GLI3 associated central nervous system specific enhancers. Dev Genes Evol 231, 21–32 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-021-00672-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-021-00672-1
Keywords
Profiles
- Irfan Hussain View author profile