Abstract
Main conclusion
Genetic improvement of seed yield and drought resistance could be simultaneously gained in anise when breeding for drought resistance.
Abstract
Improving the water use efficiency of anise is a primary objective of anise breeding programs aimed at mitigating the impacts of drought stress. This study aimed to determine the predominant mechanisms involved in drought tolerance and investigate the genetic control of associated traits with drought tolerance and higher grain yield. According to these aims, 10 half-diallel hybrids and their five parents were evaluated in both field and greenhouse lysimetric experiments under well-watered and water deficit stress conditions. The results indicated that the inheritance of grain yield is complex and affected by water deficit stress. Similar heritability and genetic architecture were detected for flowering time and percentages of photosynthate partitioned to grain (PPPG) in both well-watered and water deficit stress treatments. Significant negative genetic correlations were observed between grain yield and flowering time, root dry mass, root diameter, root volume, root number, percentages of photosynthate partitioned to shoot, and percentages of photosynthate partitioned to root. Therefore, the selection of low values of these attributes can be used to improve grain yield under drought conditions. In contrast, a positive significant genetic linkage between grain yield and PPPG, chlorophyll content, cell membrane stability, and leaf relative water content reveal selection for high values of these attributes is favored. These attributes could be used as surrogate selection criteria in the early segregating generations. The P1 parent (early ripening parent) contained key genes associated with PPPG and drought escape. It was concluded that improvement of drought tolerance and grain yield could be simultaneously achieved in anise breeding programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- PPPG:
-
Percentages of photosynthate partitioned to grain
- PPPS:
-
Percentages of photosynthate partitioned to shoot
- PPPR:
-
Percentages of photosynthate partitioned to root
- TE:
-
Transpiration efficiency
- RWC:
-
Relative water content
- VPD:
-
Vapor pressure deficit
- WUE:
-
Water use efficiency
- SCA:
-
Specific combining ability
- GCA:
-
General combining ability
- SCMR:
-
SPAD chlorophyll meter reading
- WR:
-
Water regime
References
Ahmed HGMD, Zeng Y, Yang X, Anwaar HA, Mansha MZ, Hanif CMS, Ikram K, Ullah A, Alghanem SMS (2020) Conferring drought-tolerant wheat genotypes through morpho-physiological and chlorophyll indices at seedling stage. Saudi J Biol Sci 27:2116–2123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.06.019
Akrami M, Arzani A (2019) Inheritance of fruit yield and quality in melon (Cucumis melo L.) grown under field salinity stress. Sci Rep 9:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43616-6
Arunyanark A, Jogloy S, Akkasaeng C, Vorasoot N, Kesmala T, Nageswara Rao RC, Wright GC, Patanothai A (2008) Chlorophyll stability is an indicator of drought tolerance in peanut. J Agron Crop Sci 194:113–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00299.x
Aslam M, Maqbool MA, Cengiz R (2015) Drought stress in maize (Zea mays L.), effects, resistance mechanisms, global achievements and biological strategies for improvement. Springer, Cham
Baker RJ (1978) Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Sci 18:533–536. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183X001800040001x
Basu S, Ramegowda V, Kumar A, Pereira A (2016) Plant adaptation to drought stress. F1000Research. 5:1554. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7678.1
Blum A (2009) Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Res 112:119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.03.009
Den Herder G, Van Isterdael G, Beeckman T, De Smet I (2010) The roots of a new green revolution. Trends Plant Sci 15:600–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.009
Devi MJ, Sinclair TR, Vadez V, Krishnamurthy L (2009) Peanut genotypic variation in transpiration efficiency and decreased transpiration during progressive soil drying. Field Crops Res 114:280–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.08.012
Dwivedi SK, Arora A, Singh VP, Singh GP (2018) Induction of water deficit tolerance in wheat due to exogenous application of plant growth regulators: membrane stability, water relations and photosynthesis. Photosynthetica 56:478–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-017-0695-2
Esim N, Güneş H (2021) Effects of drought and salinity on antioxidant mechanisms and secondary metabolites in anise (Pimpinella anisum L.) leaves. Russ J Plant Physiol 68:708–717. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443721040051
Excel (2013) “Microsoft office excel 2013”, in version 2013. Microsoft, Redmond
Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Limited, London
Fang Y, Xiong L (2015) General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci 72:673–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1767-0
Farooq M, Gogoi N, Barthakur S, Baroowa B, Bharadwaj N, Alghamdi SS, Siddique KH (2017) Drought stress in grain legumes during reproduction and grain filling. J Agron Crop Sci 203:81–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12169
Fenta BA, Beebe SE, Kunert KJ, Burridge JD, Barlow KM, Lynch JP, Foyer CH (2014) Field phenotyping of soybean roots for drought stress tolerance. Agronomy 4:418–435. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy4030418
Feyzian E, Dehghani H, Rezai AM, Jalali Javaran M (2009) Diallel cross analysis for maturity and yield-related traits in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Euphytica 168:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-9904-9
Franks SJ (2011) Plasticity and evolution in drought avoidance and escape in the annual plant Brassica rapa. New Phytol 190:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03603.x
Geravandi M, Farshadfar E, Kahrizi D (2011) Evaluation of some physiological traits as indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes. Russ J Plant Physiol 58:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443711010067
Gholizadeh A, Dehghani H, Khodadadi M, Gulick PJ (2018) Genetic combining ability of coriander genotypes for agronomic and phytochemical traits in response to contrasting irrigation regimes. PLoS ONE 13:e0199630. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199630
Gholizadeh A, Dehghani H, Khodadadi M (2019) Quantitative genetic analysis of water deficit tolerance in coriander through physiological traits. Plant Genet Resour 17:255–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262118000539
Gonçalves JGR, Andrade ERD, Silva DAD, Esteves JADF, Chiorato AF, Carbonell SAM (2019) Drought tolerance evaluated in common bean genotypes. Agric Sci 43:e001719. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-7054201943001719
Gowda VRP, Henry A, Yamauchi A, Shashidhar HE, Serraj R (2011) Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crops Res 122:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.03.001
Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9560463
Guan YS, Serraj R, Liu SH, Xu JL, Ali J, Wang WS, Venus E, Zhu LH, Li ZK (2010) Simultaneously improving yield under drought stress and non-stress conditions: a case study of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot 61:4145–4156. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq212
Haile GG, Tang Q, Hosseini-Moghari SM, Liu X, Gebremicael TG, Leng G, Kebede A, Xu X, Yun X (2020) Projected impacts of climate change on drought patterns over East Africa. Earth’s Future 8(7):e2020EF001502. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001502
Hanifei M, Mehravi S, Khodadadi M, Severn-Ellis AA, Edwards D, Batley J (2021) Detection of epistasis for seed and some phytochemical traits in coriander under different irrigation regimes. Agronomy 11:1891. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091891
Hanifei M, Gholizadeh A, Khodadadi M, Mehravi S, Hanifeh M, Edwards D, Batley J (2022) Dissection of genetic effects, heterosis, and inbreeding depression for phytochemical traits in coriander. Plants 11:2959. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212959
Holland JB (2006) Estimating genotypic correlations and their standard errors using multivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation with SAS Proc MIXED. Crop Sci 46:642–654. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0191
Hund A, Ruta N, Liedgens M (2009) Rooting depth and water use efficiency of tropical maize inbred lines, differing in drought tolerance. Plant Soil 318:311–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9843-6
Jones HG (2013) Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. Cambridge University Press, New York
Jongrungklang N, Toomsan B, Vorasoot N, Jogloy S, Boote KJ, Hoogenboom G, Patanothai A (2011) Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with different yield responses to pre-flowering drought stress. Field Crops Res 120:262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.10.008
Katsoulis GI, Kimbaris AC, Anastasaki E, Damalas CA, Kyriazopoulos AP (2022) Chamomile and anise cultivation in olive agroforestry systems. Forests 13:128. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010128
Kazan K, Lyons R (2016) The link between flowering time and stress tolerance. J Exp Bot 67:47–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv441
Khodadadi M, Dehghani H, Jalali-Javaran M, Rashidi-Monfared S, Christopher JT (2016) Numerical and graphical assessment of relationships between traits of the Iranian Coriandrum sativum L. core collection by considering genotype× irrigation interaction. Sci Hortic 200:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.003Get
Khodadadi M, Dehghani H, Jalali Javaran M (2017) Quantitative genetic analysis reveals potential to genetically improve fruit yield and drought resistance simultaneously in coriander. Front Plant Sci 8:568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00568
Koolachart R, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Wongkaew S, Holbrook CC, Jongrungklang N, Kesmala T, Patanothai A (2013) Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with different yield responses to terminal drought. Field Crops Res 149:366–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.05.024
Lal C, Hariprasanna K, Rathnakumar AL, Gor HK, Chikani BM (2006) Gene action for surrogate traits of water-use efficiency and harvest index in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Ann Appl Biol 148:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00047.x
Leilah AA, Al-Khateeb SA (2005) Statistical analysis of wheat yield under drought conditions. J Arid Environ 61:483–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.10.011
Li C, Li L, Reynolds MP, Wang J, Chang X, Mao X, Jing R (2021) Recognizing the hidden half in wheat: root system attributes associated with drought tolerance. J Exp Bot 72:5117–5133. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab124
Lopes MS, Reynolds MP (2010) Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots is associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat. Funct Plant Biol 37:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09121
Mehravi S, Ranjbar GA, Mirzaghaderi G, Severn-Ellis AA, Scheben A, Edwards D, Batley J (2021) De novo SNP discovery and genotyping of Iranian Pimpinella species using ddRAD sequencing. Agronomy 11:1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071342
Mehravi S, Ranjbar GA, Najafi-Zarrini H, Mirzaghaderi G, Hanifei M, Severn-Ellis AA, Edwards D, Batley J (2022) Karyology and genome size analyses of Iranian endemic Pimpinella (Apiaceae) species. Front Plant Sci 13:898881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.898881
Mehravi S, Hanifei M, Khodadadi M, Gholizadeh A, Sohrabi SS (2023) Evaluation of relationships between traits of anise (Pimpinella anisum L.) genotypes in response to drought stress using the structural equation modeling and biplot method. Acta Physiol Plant 45:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-022-03491-7
Miao L, Mao X, Wang J, Liu Z, Zhang B, Li W, Chang X, Reynolds M, Wang Z, Jing R (2017) Elite haplotypes of a protein kinase gene TaSnRK2. 3 associated with important agronomic traits in common wheat. Front Plant Sci 8:368. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00368
Mickelbart MV, Hasegawa PM, Bailey-Serres J (2015) Genetic mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance that translate to crop yield stability. Nat Rev Genet 16:237–251. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3901
Mohi-Ud-Din M, Hossain M, Rohman M, Uddin M, Haque M, Ahmed JU, Hossain A, Hassan MM, Mostofa MG (2021) Multivariate analysis of morpho-physiological traits reveals differential drought tolerance potential of bread wheat genotypes at the seedling stage. Plants 10:879. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050879
Morales CG, Pino MT, Del Pozo A (2013) Phenological and physiological responses to drought stress and subsequent rehydration cycles in two raspberry cultivars. Sci Hortic 162:234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.07.025
Muktadir MA, Adhikari KN, Merchant A, Belachew KY, Vandenberg A, Stoddard FL, Khazaei H (2020) Physiological and biochemical basis of Faba bean breeding for drought adaptation-A review. Agronomy 10:1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091345
Nehe AS, Foulkes MJ, Ozturk I, Rasheed A, York L, Kefauver SC, Ozdemir F, Morgounov A (2021) Root and canopy traits and adaptability genes explain drought tolerance responses in winter wheat. PLoS ONE 16:e0242472. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242472
Özgüven M (2012) Aniseed. In: Peter KV (ed) Handbook of herbs and spices, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 39–51
Patel J, Mishra A (2021) Plant aquaporins alleviate drought tolerance in plants by modulating cellular biochemistry, root-architecture, and photosynthesis. Physiol Plant 172:1030–1044. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13324
Pinto RS, Reynolds MP (2015) Common genetic basis for canopy temperature depression under heat and drought stress associated with optimized root distribution in bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 128:575–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2453-9
Pu FT, Watson MF (2005) Pimpinella L. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH (eds) Flora of China, 1st edn. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Chicago, pp 93–104
Rahman M, Ullah I, Ahsraf M, Stewart JM, Zafar Y (2008) Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in cotton. Agron Sustain Dev 28:439–447. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2007041
Ratnakumar P, Vadez V (2011) Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) genotypes tolerant to intermittent drought maintain a high harvest index and have small leaf canopy under stress. Funct Plant Biol 38:1016–1023. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP11145
Ratnakumar P, Vadez V, Nigam SN, Krishnamurthy L (2009) Assessment of transpiration efficiency in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drought using a lysimetric system. Plant Biol 11:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00260.x
Rivero RM, Kojima M, Gepstein A, Sakakibara H, Mittler R, Gepstein S, Blumwald E (2007) Delayed leaf senescence induces extreme drought tolerance in a flowering plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19631–19636. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.070945310
Saeedfar S, Negahban M, Soorestani MM (2015) The effect of drought stress on the essential oil content and some of the biochemical characteristics of anise hyssop (Agastache foeniculum [Pursh] Kuntze). European J Mol Biotechnol 8:103–114. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejmb.2015.8.103
Saneoka H, Moghaieb RE, Premachandra GS, Fujita K (2004) Nitrogen nutrition and water stress effects on cell membrane stability and leaf water relations in Agrostis palustris Huds. Environ Exp Bot 52:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.01.011
SAS (2005) Statistical Analysis Software, Inc. Cary, NC
Sayar R, Khemira H, Kharrat M (2007) Inheritance of deeper root length and grain yield in half-diallel durum wheat (Triticum durum) crosses. Ann Appl Biol 151:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00168.x
Serraj R, Krishnamurthy L, Kashiwagi J, Kumar J, Chandra S, Crouch JH (2004) Variation in root traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown under terminal drought. Field Crops Res 88:115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2003.12.001
Shakeel AA, Xiao-yu X, Long-chang W, Muhammad FS, Chen M, Wang L (2011) Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr J Agic Res 6:2026–2032. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR10.027
Sheshshayee MS, Bindumadhava H, Rachaputi NR, Prasad TG, Udayakumar M, Wright GC, Nigam SN (2006) Leaf chlorophyll concentration relates to transpiration efficiency in peanut. Ann Appl Biol 148:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.00033.x
Silva MDA, Jifon JL, da Silva JAG, dos Santos CM, Sharma V (2014) Relationships between physiological traits and productivity of sugarcane in response to water deficit. J Agric Sci 152:104–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859612000834
Sivasakthi K, Tharanya M, Kholová J, Wangari Muriuki R, Thirunalasundari T, Vadez V (2017) Chickpea genotypes contrasting for vigor and canopy conductance also differ in their dependence on different water transport pathways. Front Plant Sci 8:1663. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01663
Solomon KF, Labuschagne MT (2004) Inheritance of evapotranspiration and transpiration efficiencies in diallel F1 hybrids of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Euphytica 136:69–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000019522.80626.48
Songsri P, Jogloy S, Holbrook CC, Kesmala T, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A (2009) Association of root, specific leaf area and SPAD chlorophyll meter reading to water use efficiency of peanut under different available soil water. Agric Water Manag 96:790–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.10.009
Sreeman SM, Vijayaraghavareddy P, Sreevathsa R, Rajendrareddy S, Arakesh S, Bharti P, Dharmappa P, Soolanayakanahally R (2018) Introgression of physiological traits for a comprehensive improvement of drought adaptation in crop plants. Front Chem 6:92. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00092
Tanner CB, Sinclair TR (1983) Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search? In: Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR (eds) Limitations to efficient water use in crop production, 3rd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison
Toscano S, Ferrante A, Romano D (2019) Response of mediterranean ornamental plants to drought stress. Horticulturae 5:6. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5010006
Vadez V, Deshpande SP, Kholova J, Hammer GL, Borrell AK, Talwar HS, Hash CT (2011) Stay-green quantitative trait loci’s effects on water extraction, transpiration efficiency and seed yield depend on recipient parent background. Funct Plant Biol 38:553–566. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP11073
Vadez V, Kholova J, Medina S, Kakkera A, Anderberg H (2014) Transpiration efficiency: new insights into an old story. J Exp Bot 65:6141–6153. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru040
Weigand M, Kemna A (2017) Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography as a non-invasive tool to characterize and monitor crop root systems. Biogeosciences 14:921–939. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-921-2017
Xin Z, Aiken R, Burke J (2009) Genetic diversity of transpiration efficiency in sorghum. Field Crops Res 111:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.10.010
Yadav B, Jogawat A, Lal SK, Lakra N, Mehta S, Shabek N, Narayan OP (2021) Plant mineral transport systems and the potential for crop improvement. Planta 253:45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03551-7
Zegaoui Z, Planchais S, Cabassa C, Djebbar R, Belbachir OA, Carol P (2017) Variation in relative water content, proline accumulation and stress gene expression in two cowpea landraces under drought. J Plant Physiol 218:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2017.07.009
Zhang Y, Kang MS, Lamkey KR (2005) DIALLEL-SAS05: a comprehensive program for Griffing’s and Gardner-Eberhart analyses. Agron J 97:1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0260
Zhang K, Liu Y, Luo L, Zhang X, Li G, Wan Y, Liu F (2021) Root traits of peanut cultivars with different drought resistant under drought stress at flowering and pegging phase. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci 71:363–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2021.1897663
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Forests, Range and Watershed Management Organization, Tehran, Iran, for providing the seeds of anise genotypes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
Additional information
Communicated by Dorothea Bartels.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mehravi, S., Hanifei, M., Gholizadeh, A. et al. Exploring the quantitative genetics of traits associated with drought tolerance and yield in Pimpinella anisum L. under different water regimes. Planta 257, 102 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-023-04128-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-023-04128-w