Skip to main content
Log in

Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Chronic pain after hernia repair is common, and it is unclear to what extent the different operation techniques influence its incidence. The aim of the present study was to compare the three major standardized techniques of hernia repair with regard to postoperative pain.

Patients and methods

Two hundred and eighty male patients with primary hernias were prospectively, randomly selected to undergo Shouldice, tension-free Lichtenstein or laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty repairs. Patients were examined after 52 months with emphasis on chronic pain and its limitations to their quality of life.

Results

Chronic pain was present in 36% of patients after Shouldice repair, in 31% after Lichtenstein repair and in 15% after TAPP repair. Pain correlated with physical strain in 25% of patients after Shouldice, in 20% after Lichtenstein and in 11% after TAPP repair. Limitations to daily life, leisure activities and sports occurred in 14% of patients after Shouldice, 13% after Lichtenstein and 2.4% after TAPP repair.

Conclusion

Chronic pain after hernia surgery is significantly more common with the open approach to the groin by Shouldice and Lichtenstein methods. The presence of the prosthetic mesh was not associated with significant postoperative complaints. The TAPP repair represents the most effective approach of the three techniques in the hands of an experienced surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1996) Open “tension-free” repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg 162:447–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bittner R, Leibl B, Kraft K, Daubler P, Schwarz J (1996) Laparoscopic hernioplasty (TAPP)—complications and recurrences in 900 operations. Zentralbl Chir 121:313–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Collaboration EH (2000) Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:860–867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H (2001) Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 233:1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hay JM, Boudet MJ, Fingerhut A, Poucher J, Hennet H, Habib E, Veyrieres M, Flamant Y (1995) Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicenter controlled trial in 1578 patients. Ann Surg 222:719–727

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liem MS, van der GY, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmedt CG, Leibl BJ, Bittner R (2002) Endoscopic inguinal hernia repair in comparison with Shouldice and Lichtenstein repair. A systematic review of randomized trials. Dig Surg 19:511–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tons C, Kupczyk-Joeris D, Pleye J, Rotzscher VM, Schumpelick V (1990) Cremaster resection in Shouldice repair. A prospective controlled bicenter study. Chirurgie 61:109–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Amid PK (2002) A 1-stage surgical treatment for postherniorrhaphy neuropathic pain: triple neurectomy and proximal end implantation without mobilization of the cord. Arch Surg 137:100–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arlt G, Schumpelick V (2002) The Shouldice repair for inguinal hernia—technique and results. Zentralbl Chir 127:565–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Broin EO, Horner C, Mealy K, Kerin MJ, Gillen P, O’Brien M, Tanner WA (1995) Meralgia paraesthetica following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. An anatomical analysis. Surg Endosc 9:76–78

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H (1999) Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:1528–1531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Courtney CA, Duffy K, Serpell MG, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Outcome of patients with severe chronic pain following repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1310–1314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Filipi CJ, Gaston-Johansson F, McBride PJ, Murayama K, Gerhardt J, Cornet DA, Lund RJ, Hirai D, Graham R, Patil K, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Gaines RD (1996) An assessment of pain and return to normal activity. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair. Surg Endosc 10:983–986

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fingerhut A, Millat B, Bataille N, Yachouchi E, Dziri C, Boudet MJ, Paul A (2001) Laparoscopic hernia repair in 2000. Update of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Consensus Conference in Madrid, June 1994. Surg Endosc 15:1061–1065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E (2002) Recurrence and pain three years after groin hernia repair. Validation of postal questionnaire and selective physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heise CP, Starling JR (1998) Mesh inguinodynia: a new clinical syndrome after inguinal herniorrhaphy? J Am Coll Surg 187:514–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Junge K, Peiper C, Rosch R, Lynen P, Schumpelick V (2002) Effect of tension induced by Shouldice repair on postoperative course and long-term outcome. Eur J Surg 168:329–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IM (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1476–1479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leibl BJ, Kraft B, Redecke JD, Schmedt CG, Ulrich M, Kraft K, Bittner R (2002) Are postoperative complaints and complications influenced by different techniques in fashioning and fixing the mesh in transperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty? Results of a prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 26:1481–1484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R, Wayand W (1996) Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 83:1563–1566

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tons C, Klinge U, Kupczyk-Joeris D, Rotzscher VM, Schumpelick V (1991) Controlled study of cremaster resection in Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Zentralbl Chir 116:737–743

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wright DM, Kennedy A, Baxter JN, Fullarton GM, Fife LM, Sunderland GT, O’Dwyer PJ (1996) Early outcome after open versus extraperitoneal endoscopic tension-free hernioplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Surgery 119:552–557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bower S, Moore BB, Weiss SM (1996) Neuralgia after inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg 62:664–667

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fleming WR, Elliott TB, Jones RM, Hardy KJ (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with the Shouldice technique. Br J Surg 88:1183–1188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koninger JS, Oster M, Butters M (1998) Management of inguinal hernia—a comparison of current methods. Chirurgie 69:1340–1344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tschudi J, Wagner M, Klaiber C, Brugger J, Frei E, Krahenbuhl L, Inderbitzi R, Husler J, Hsu SS (1996) Controlled multicenter trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice herniorrhaphy. Early results. Surg Endosc 10:845–847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wellwood J, Sculpher MJ, Stoker D, Nicholls GJ, Geddes C, Whitehead A, Singh R, Spiegelhalter D (1998) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. Br Med J 317:103–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schumpelick V, Treutner KH, Arlt G (1994) Inguinal hernia repair in adults. Lancet 344:375–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Amid K (2003) The Lichtenstein repair in 2002: an overview of causes of recurrence after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia 7:13–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bittner R, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Kraft K, Leibl BJ (2002) Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1062–1066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. Lancet 354:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK (2003) Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17:850–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Leibl BJ, Daubler P, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Bittner R (2000) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial between laparoscopic hernioplasty and Shouldice repair. Br J Surg 87:780–783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wright D, Paterson C, Scott N, Hair A, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235:333–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zieren J, Zieren HU, Jacobi CA, Wenger FA, Muller JM (1998) Prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic and open tension-free inguinal hernia repair with Shouldice’s operation. Am J Surg 175:330–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, Svensson C, Edlund G (2002) Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg 89:45–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Juul P, Christensen K (1999) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:316–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, Englund T, Westman B, Anderberg B (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 237:142–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosch R, Junge K, Schachtrupp A, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V (2003) Mesh implants in hernia repair. Inflammatory cell response in a rat model. Eur Surg Res 35:161–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Köninger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Köninger, J., Redecke, J. & Butters, M. Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389, 361–365 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0496-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0496-5

Keywords

Navigation