Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Attractor models of working memory and their modulation by reward

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work reports an empirical examination of two key issues in theoretical neuroscience: distractibility in the context of working memory (WM) and its reward dependence. While these issues have been examined fruitfully in isolation (e.g. Macoveanu et al. in Biol Cybern 96(4): 407–19, 2007), we address them here in tandem, with a focus on how distractibility and reward interact. In particular, we parameterise an observation model that embodies the nonlinear form of such interactions, as described in a recent neuronal network model (Gruber et al. in J Comput Neurosci 20:153–166, 2006). We observe that memory for a target stimulus can be corrupted by distracters in the delay period. Interestingly, in contrast to our theoretical predictions, this corruption was only partial. Distracters do not simply overwrite target; rather, a compromise is reached between target and distracter. Finally, we observed a trend towards a reduced distractibility under conditions of high reward. We discuss the implications of these findings for theoretical formulations of basal and dopamine (DA)-modulated neural bump- attractor networks of working memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baddeley AD and Hitch G (1974). Working memory. In: Bower, GH (eds) The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, vol 8, pp 47–89. Academic, New York,

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley AD (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 417–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brody CD, Romo R and Kepecs (2003). Basic mechanisms for graded persistent activity: discrete attractors, continuous attractors, and dynamic representations. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13: 204–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fougnie D and Marois R (2006). Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms. Psychol Sci 17(6): 526–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber AJ, Solla SA, Surmeier DJ and Houk JC (2003). Modulation of striatal single units by expected reward: a spiny neuron model displaying dopamine-induced bistability. J Neurophysiol 90(2): 1095–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber AJ, Dayan P, Gutkin BS and Solla SA (2006). Dopamine modulation in the basal ganglia locks the gate on working memory. J Comput Neurosci 20: 153–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen LK, Pugh KR, Mencl WE, Gelernter J (2006) C957T polymorphism of the dopamine D2 receptor gene modulates the effect of nicotine on working memory performance and cortical processing efficiency. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 188:530–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalivas PW, Jackson D, Romanidies A, Wyndham L and Duffy P (2001). Involvement of pallidothalamic circuitry in working memory. Neuroscience 104(1): 129–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kermadi I and Joseph JP (1995). Activity in the caudate nucleus of monkey during spatial sequencing. J Neurophysiol 74(3): 911–933

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis SJ, Dove A, Robbins TW, Barker RA and Owen AM (2004). Striatal contributions to working memory: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in humans. Eur J Neurosci 19(3): 755–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynd-Balta E and Haber SN (1994). The organization of midbrain projections to the striatum in the primate: sensorimotor-related striatum versus ventral striatum. Neuroscience 59(3): 625–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Machens CK, Romo R and Brody CD (2005). Flexible control of mutual inhibition: a neural model of two-interval discrimination. Science 307(5712): 1121–1124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macoveanu J, Klingberg T, TegnéJ (2007) Neuronal firing rates account for distractor effects on mnemonic accuracy in a visuo-spatial working memory task. Biol Cybern 96(4):407–419. Epub 27 Jan 2007

  • Miyoshi E, Wietzikoski S, Camplessei M, Silveira R, Takahashi RN and Da Cunha C (2002). Impaired learning in a spatial working memory version and in a cued version of the water maze in rats with MPTP-induced mesencephalic dopaminergic lesions. Brain Res Bull 58(7): 41–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller U, Cramon DY and von Pollmann S (1998). Dl- versus D2-receptor modulation of visuospatial working memory in humans. J Neurosci 18(7): 2720–2728

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicola SM, Surmeier DJ and Malenka RC (2000). Dopaminergicmodulation of neuronal excitability in the striatum and nucleus accumbens. Annu Rev Neurosci 23: 185–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owen AM (2004) Working memory: imaging the magic number four. Curr Biol 14(14):R573–R574 (Review)

    Google Scholar 

  • Renart A, Song P and Wang XJ (2003). Robust spatial working memory through homeostatic synaptic scaling in heterogeneous cortical networks. Neuron 38(3): 473–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsodyks M and Sejnowski T (1995). Associative memory and hippocampal place cells. Int J Neural Syst 6(supp. 1995): 81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GV and Goldman-Rakic PS (1995). Modulation of memory fields by dopamine D1 receptors in prefrontal cortex. Nature 376: 572–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K (1996). Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: a theory. J Neurosci 16(6): 2112–2126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zahrt J, Taylor JR, Mathew RG and Arnsten AF (1997). Supranormal stimulation of D1 dopamine receptors in the rodent prefrontal cortex impairs spatial working memory performance. J Neurosci 17(21): 8528–8535

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin R. Chumbley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chumbley, J.R., Dolan, R.J. & Friston, K.J. Attractor models of working memory and their modulation by reward. Biol Cybern 98, 11–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0202-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0202-0

Keywords

Navigation