Effect of prior metabolic rate on the kinetics of oxygen uptake during moderate-intensity exercise

Abstract.

Pulmonary oxygen uptake (% MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaeaart1ev0aqatCvAUfKttLearuavP1wzZbqedmvETj2BSbWexL % MBbXgBcf2CPn2qVrwzqf2zLnharyWqVvNCPvMCG4uz3bqee0evGueE % 0jxyaibaieYlf9irVeeu0dXdh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf % ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr % 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbdAfawzaaca % Gaee4ta80aaSbaaSqaaiabbkdaYaqabaaaaa!386A! $\dot V{\rm O}_{\rm 2}$ ) dynamics during moderate-intensity exercise are often assumed to be dynamically linear (i.e. neither the gain nor the time constant (τ) of the response varies as a function of work rate). However, faster, slower and unchanged % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaeaart1ev0aqatCvAUfKttLearuavP1wzZbqedmvETj2BSbWexL % MBbXgBcf2CPn2qVrwzqf2zLnharyWqVvNCPvMCG4uz3bqee0evGueE % 0jxyaibaieYlf9irVeeu0dXdh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf % ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr % 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbdAfawzaaca % Gaee4ta80aaSbaaSqaaiabbkdaYaqabaaaaa!386A! $\dot V{\rm O}_{\rm 2}$ kinetics have been reported during work-to-work transitions compared to rest-to-work transitions, all within the moderate-intensity domain. In an attempt to resolve these discrepancies and to improve the confidence of the parameter estimation, we determined the % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaeaart1ev0aqatCvAUfKttLearuavP1wzZbqedmvETj2BSbWexL % MBbXgBcf2CPn2qVrwzqf2zLnharyWqVvNCPvMCG4uz3bqee0evGueE % 0jxyaibaieYlf9irVeeu0dXdh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf % ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr % 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbdAfawzaaca % Gaee4ta80aaSbaaSqaaiabbkdaYaqabaaaaa!386A! $\dot V{\rm O}_{\rm 2}$ response dynamics using the averaged response to repeated exercise bouts in seven healthy male volunteers. Each subject initially performed a ramp-incremental exercise test for the estimation of the lactate threshold (% MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaeaart1ev0aqatCvAUfKttLearuavP1wzZbqedmvETj2BSbWexL % MBbXgBcf2CPn2qVrwzqf2zLnharyWqVvNCPvMCG4uz3bqee0evGueE % 0jxyaibaieYlf9irVeeu0dXdh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf % ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr % 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbeI7aXzaaja % WaaSbaaSqaaiabbYeambqabaaaaa!3801! $\hat \theta _{\rm L}$ ). They then performed an average of four repetitions of each of three constant-work-rate (WR) tests: (1) between 20 W and a work rate of 50% (WR50) between 20 W and 90% % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaeaart1ev0aqatCvAUfKttLearuavP1wzZbqedmvETj2BSbWexL % MBbXgBcf2CPn2qVrwzqf2zLnharyWqVvNCPvMCG4uz3bqee0evGueE % 0jxyaibaieYlf9irVeeu0dXdh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf % ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr % 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbeI7aXzaaja % WaaSbaaSqaaiabbYeambqabaaaaa!3801! $\hat \theta _{\rm L}$ (step 1→2), (2) between WR50 and 90% % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaeaart1ev0aqatCvAUfKttLearuavP1wzZbqedmvETj2BSbWexL % MBbXgBcf2CPn2qVrwzqf2zLnharyWqVvNCPvMCG4uz3bqee0evGueE % 0jxyaibaieYlf9irVeeu0dXdh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf % ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr % 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbeI7aXzaaja % WaaSbaaSqaaiabbYeambqabaaaaa!3801! $\hat \theta _{\rm L}$ (step 2→3), and (3) between 20 W and 90% % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaeaart1ev0aqatCvAUfKttLearuavP1wzZbqedmvETj2BSbWexL % MBbXgBcf2CPn2qVrwzqf2zLnharyWqVvNCPvMCG4uz3bqee0evGueE % 0jxyaibaieYlf9irVeeu0dXdh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf % ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr % 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbeI7aXzaaja % WaaSbaaSqaaiabbYeambqabaaaaa!3801! $\hat \theta _{\rm L}$ (step 1→3); 6 min was spent at each work rate increment and decrement. Parameters of the kinetic response of phase II % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaeaart1ev0aqatCvAUfKttLearuavP1wzZbqedmvETj2BSbWexL % MBbXgBcf2CPn2qVrwzqf2zLnharyWqVvNCPvMCG4uz3bqee0evGueE % 0jxyaibaieYlf9irVeeu0dXdh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf % ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr % 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbdAfawzaaca % Gaee4ta80aaSbaaSqaaiabbkdaYaqabaaaaa!386A! $\dot V{\rm O}_{\rm 2}$ were established by non-linear least-squares fitting techniques. The kinetics of % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaeaart1ev0aqatCvAUfKttLearuavP1wzZbqedmvETj2BSbWexL % MBbXgBcf2CPn2qVrwzqf2zLnharyWqVvNCPvMCG4uz3bqee0evGueE % 0jxyaibaieYlf9irVeeu0dXdh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf % ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr % 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbdAfawzaaca % Gaee4ta80aaSbaaSqaaiabbkdaYaqabaaaaa!386A! $\dot V{\rm O}_{\rm 2}$ were significantly slower at the upper reaches of the moderate-intensity domain (step 2→3) compared to steps 1→2 and 1→3 [group mean (SD) phase II τ: step 1→2 25.3 (4.9) s, step 2→3 40.0 (7.4) s and step 1→3 32.2 (6.9) s]. The off-transient values of τ were not significantly different from each other: 36.8 (16.3) s, 38.9 (11.6) s and 30.8 (5.7) s for steps 1→2, 2→3 and 1→3, respectively. Surprisingly, the on-transient gain (G, % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaeaart1ev0aqatCvAUfKttLearuavP1wzZbqedmvETj2BSbqefm % 0B1jxALjhiov2DaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8srps0lbbf9q8WrFfeu % Y-Hhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbba9q8WqFfea0-yr0RYxir-Jbba9q8 % aq0-yq-He9q8qqQ8frFve9Fve9Ff0dmeaabaqaciGacaGaaeqabaWa % aeaaeaaakeaacqqHuoarcuWGwbGvgaGaaiabb+eapnaaBaaaleaacq % qGYaGmaeqaaOGaee4la8IaeuiLdqKaee4vaCLaeeOuaifaaa!36DD! $\Delta \dot V{\rm O}_{\rm 2} {\rm /}\Delta {\rm WR}$ ) was also found to vary among the three steps [G=10.56 (0.42) ml·min^–1·W^–1, 11.85 (0.64) ml·min^–1·W^–1 and 11.23 (0.52) ml·min^–1·W^–1 for steps 1→2, 2→3 and 1→3, respectively]; the off-transient G did not vary significantly and was close to that for the on-transient step 1→3 in all cases. Our results do not support a dynamically linear system model of % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+- % feaaeaart1ev0aqatCvAUfKttLearuavP1wzZbqedmvETj2BSbWexL % MBbXgBcf2CPn2qVrwzqf2zLnharyWqVvNCPvMCG4uz3bqee0evGueE % 0jxyaibaieYlf9irVeeu0dXdh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf % ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr % 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaciaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbdAfawzaaca % Gaee4ta80aaSbaaSqaaiabbkdaYaqabaaaaa!386A! $\dot V{\rm O}_{\rm 2}$ during cycle ergometer exercise even in the moderate-intensity domain. The greater oxygen deficit per unit power increment in the higher reaches of the moderate-intensity domain necessitates a greater transient lactate contribution to the energy transfer, or a greater phosphocreatine breakdown, or possibly both.