Abstract
Hypnotizability is a cognitive trait measured by standard scales and associated with peculiar physiological responses to cognitive and physical stimulations. Hypnotizability-related differences can also be observed in non-hypnotic state and in the absence of specific suggestions. In the normal bipedal stance subjects with high hypnotizability (Highs) exhibit a higher tolerance of alteration of the visual and leg/neck proprioceptive input with respect to low hypnotizable individuals (Lows). Aim of the study was to investigate whether this characteristic represents a disadvantage during highly demanding postural tasks. Sixteen Highs and 16 Lows of both genders participated in an experimental session consisting of maintaining balance while standing with open or closed eyes on a seesaw platform allowing roll movements. The results did not show significant differences between Highs and Lows in inclination area and time, with the exception of a greater ability of Highs with respect to Lows when they began the task displacing the body weight from the left to the right leg. Thus, high hypnotizability does not represent a disadvantage for balance control during highly demanding postural tasks. Together with previous studies, the present findings suggest that the Highs’ postural control might shift from a very “economic”, preeminently centrally driven functioning mode, characteristic of easy postural tasks, to an efficaciously periphery-controlled mode, required by difficult postural tasks.
References
Balthazard GC, Woody EZ (1989) Bimodality, dimensionality, and the notion of hypnotic types. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 37:70–89
Carey DP, Smith DT, Martin D, Smith G, Skriver J, Rutland A (2009) Shepherd JW The bi-pedal ape: plasticity and asymmetry in footedness. Cortex 45:650–661
Carli G, Manzoni D, Santarcangelo EL (2008a) Hypnotizability-related integration of perception and action. Cogn Neuropsychol 25:1065–1076
Carli G, Huber A, Santarcangelo EL (2008b) Hypnotizability and chronic pain: an ambiguous connection. Contemp Hypn 25:65–77
Carvalho C, Kirsch I, Mazzoni G, Leal I (2008) Portuguese norms for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) Scale of hypnotic susceptibility. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 56:295–305
Collins J, De Luca CJ (1993) Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of centre-of-pressure trajectories. Exp Brain Res 95:308–318
De Pascalis V, Bellusci A, Russo PM (2000) Italian norms for the Stanford Hypnotic susceptibility scale, form C. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 48:15–23
Dieterich Bense S, Lutz S, Drzezga A, Stephan T, Bartenstein P, Brandt T (2003) Dominance for vestibular cortical control in the non dominant hemisphere. Cereb Cortex 13:100–994
Dittmar M (2002) Functional and postural lateral preferences in humans: interrelations and life-span age differences. Hum Biol 74:569–585
Green JP, Barabasz AF, Barrett D, Montgomery GH (2005) Forging ahead: the 2003 APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. Int Clin Exp Hypn 53:259–264
Guillow E, Dupui P, Golomer E (2007) Dynamic balance sensory motor control and symmetrical or asymmetrical equilibrium training. Clin Neurophysiol 118:317–324
Horton JE, Crawford HJ, Harrington G, Downs JH 3rd (2004) Increased anterior corpus callosum size associated positively with hypnotizability and the ability to control pain. Brain 12:1741–1747
Jacob RG, Redfern MS, Furman JM (2009) Space and motion discomfort and abnormal balance control in patients with anxiety disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80:74–78
Jambrik Z, Santarcangelo EL, Ghelarducci B, Picano E, Sebastiani L (2004) Does hypnotisability modulate the stress-related endothelial dysfunction? Brain Res Bull 63:213–221
Jambrik Z, Carli G, Rudish T, Varga A, Forster T, Santarcangelo EL (2005) Modulation of pain-induced endothelial dysfunction by hypnotisability. Pain 116:181–186
Jorgensen MM, Zachariae R (2002) Autonomic reactivity to cognitive and emotional stress of low, medium and high hypnotizable healthy subjects: testing predictions form the high risk model of threat perception. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 50:248–275
Kogan E, Lidor R, Bart O, Bar-Haim Y, Mintz M (2008) Comorbidity between balance and anxiety disorders: verification in a normal population. J Psychol 142:601–613
Redfern MS, Furman JM, Jacob RG (2007) Visually induced postural sway in anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord 21:704–716
Santarcangelo E, Busse K, Carli G (1989) Changes in electromyographically recorded human monosynaptic reflex in relation to hypnotic susceptibility and hypnosis. Neurosci Lett 104:157–160
Santarcangelo EL, Busse K, Carli G (2003) Frequency of occurrence of the F wave in distal flexor muscles as a function of hypnotic susceptibility and hypnosis. Cogn Brain Res 16:99–103
Santarcangelo EL, Scattina E, Carli G, Macerata A, Manzoni D (2008a) Hypnotizability-dependent modulation of postural control: effects of alteration of the visual and leg proprioceptive inputs. Exp Brain Res 191:331–340
Santarcangelo EL, Scattina E, Orsini P, Bruschini L, Ghelarducci B, Manzoni D (2008b) Effects of vestibular and neck proprioceptive stimulation on posture as a function of hypnotizability. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 56:170–184
Santarcangelo EL, Balocchi R, Scattina E, Manzoni D, Bruschini L, Ghelarducci B, Varanini M (2008c) Hypnotizability-dependent modulation of the changes in heart rate control induced by upright stance. Brain Res Bull 75:692–697
Santarcangelo EL, Scattina E, Carli G, Balocchi R, Macerata A, Manzoni D (2009) Modulation of the postural effects of cognitive load by hypnotizability. Exp Brain Res 194:323–328
Schieppati M, Tacchini E, Nardone A, Tarantola J, Corna S (1999) Subjective perception of body sway. J Neurol, Neurosurg Psychiatry 66:313–322
Tan U (1985) Relationship between the hand skill and the excitability of motoneurones innervating the postural soleus muscle in human subjects. Int J Neurosci 26:289–300
Acknowledgments
Research funded by the Italian Space Agency (DCMC project).
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has any conflict of interest concerning the study evaluation and publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Fausto Baldissera.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caratelli, E., Menzocchi, M., Carli, G. et al. Is high hypnotizability a trouble in balance control?. Eur J Appl Physiol 108, 201–206 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1280-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-009-1280-6