Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Combined fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with internal limiting membrane flap technique for progressive myopic traction maculopathy

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To present the anatomical and functional outcomes of combined fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling (FSIP) with internal limiting membrane flap (ILMF) for myopic traction maculopathy (MTM).

Methods

This is a retrospective, observational study. Included were 66 eyes of 62 patients who underwent vitrectomy with combined FSIP and ILMF (or modified ILMF) for MTM with a minimal follow-up of 6 months. Thirty-one eyes were treated with FSIP, and 35 with modified ILMF.

Results

The post-operative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 20/148 to 20/87 in the FSIP group (p < 0.001), and from 20/121 to 20/66 in the modified ILMF group (p < 0.001). The post-operative macular thickness (MT) reduced after FSIP (from 739.58 to 223.81 μm, p < 0.001) and modified ILMF (from 706.43 to 236.59 μm, p < .001). The degree of the improvement of BCVA and MT in both groups was insignificant. The incidence of a post-operative macular hole (MH) was 9.7% (3/31 eyes) with FSIP and 0% (0/35 eyes) with modified ILMF. All patients with a MH had foveoschisis in association with a lamellar hole (LMH) pre-operatively. After controlling the surgical technique, pre- and post-operative MT, follow-up duration, myopic atrophy maculopathy, and FD, the surgical technique showed significant effects on post-operative MH in all cases (p = 0.022) and in those with pre-operative LMH (p = 0.029).

Conclusion

Our pilot study showed both methods result in significant anatomical and functional improvement. The combined FSIP with ILMF method may prevent post-operative macular hole development in cases with MTM and LMH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Yes.

References

  1. Panozzo G, Mercanti A (2004) Optical coherence tomography findings in myopic traction maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 122:1455–1460. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.122.10.1455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Panozzo G, Mercanti A (2007) Vitrectomy for myopic traction maculopathy. Arch Opthalmol 125:767–772. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.125.6.767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong TY, Ferreira A, Hughes R, Carter G, Mitchell P (2014) Epidemiology and disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: an evidence-based systematic review. Am J Ophthalmol 157:9–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Takano M, Kishi S (1999) Foveal retinoschisis and retinal detachment in severely myopic eyes with posterior staphyloma. Am J Opthalmol 128:472–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00186-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baba T, Ohno-Matsui Y, Futagami S et al (2003) Prevalence and characteristics of foveal retinal detachment without macular hole in high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 135:338–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01937-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson MW (2012) Myopic traction maculopathy pathologic mechanisms and surgical treatment. Retina 32:205–210. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31825bc0de

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vanderbeek BL, Johnson MW (2012) The diversity of traction mechanisms in myopic traction maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 153:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho TZ, Yang CM, Huang JS et al (2014) Long-term outcome of foveolar internal limiting membrane nonpeeling for myopic traction maculopathy. Retina 34:1833–1840. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shimada N, Sugamoto Y, Ogawa M, Takase H, Ohno-Matsui K (2012) Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy. Am J Opthalmol 154:693–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ho TC, Chen MS, Huang JS, Shih YF, Henry Ho, Huang YH (2012) Foveola nonpeeling technique in internal limiting membrane peeling of myopic foveoschisis surgery. Retina 32:631–634. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0B013E31824D0A4B

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee CL, Wu WC, Chen KJ, Chiu LY, Wu KY, Chang YC (2017) Modified internal limiting membrane peeling technique (maculorrhexis) for myopic foveoschisis surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 95:e128-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tian T, Jin H, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Zhang H, Zhao P (2018) Long-term surgical outcomes of multiple parfoveolar curvilinear internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis. Eye (Lond) 32:1783–1789. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0178-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Adelman RA, Nawrocki J (2010) Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes. Ophthalmology 117:2018–2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3956-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kannan NB, Kohli P, Parida H, Adenuga OO, Ramasamy K (2018) Comparative study of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and ILM peeling technique in large macular holes: a randomized-control trial. BMC Ophthalmol 18:177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0826-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Schulze-Bonsel K, Feltgen N, Burau H, Hansen L, Bach M (2006) Visual acuities “hand motion” and “counting fingers” can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:1236–1240. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen Q, He J, Guangyi Hu, Xian Xu, Lv H, Yin Y, Zou H, Zhu J, Fan Y, Xun Xu (2019) Morphological characteristics and risk factors of myopic maculopathy in an older high myopia population-based on the new classification system (ATN). Am J Ophthalmol 208:356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsia Y, Ho TC, Yang CH, Hsieh YT, Lai TT, Yang CM (2020) Clinical characteristics and long-term evolution of lamellar macular hole in high myopia. PLoS ONE 6(15):e0232852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Jih-Pin Lin and Chung-May Yang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jih-Pin Lin and Chung-May Yang and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chung-May Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board and ethics committee of National Taiwan University Hospital. (IRB: 201910085RINB).

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Presentation at a conference

None.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (WMV 60639 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, JP., Yang, CM. Combined fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with internal limiting membrane flap technique for progressive myopic traction maculopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 489–496 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05397-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05397-5

Keywords

Navigation