Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Characterization of Bangerter filter effect in mild and moderate anisometropic amblyopia: predictive factors for the visual outcome

  • Pediatrics
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the outcome achieved by using Bangerter filters in cases of mild and moderate anisometropic amblyopia, and to define the predictive factors for the final visual outcome.

Methods

Prospective study comprising 62 children (age range 3–11 years) with unilateral amblyopia associated with myopic or hyperopic anisometropia. In all cases, the use of Bangerter filters were prescribed for amblyopia treatment due to the unsuccessful outcome with refractive correction. The prescribed filter always induced a visual acuity reduction in the non-amblyopic eye of 2 lines below the BSCVA of the amblyopic eye. A follow-up of 12 months was completed.

Results

A statistically significant improvement in visual acuity was observed at 3 months in both groups, amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes (p < 0.01). At 6, 9 and 12 months, additional small but statistically significant improvements in visual acuity were detected only in the amblyopic group (p ≤ 0.02). Filter density had to be changed during the follow-up in a total of 22 eyes (35.5%). A significant correlation of the visual acuity with the baseline interocular visual acuity difference was found at 3 months (r = 0.44, p < 0.01), but not at the end of the follow-up (r = 0.12, p = 0.36). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the final visual outcome was significantly correlated with the baseline visual acuity, sphere and the difference in visual acuity between eyes (R2: 0.42, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Bangerter filters are useful for treating mild or moderate amblyopia due to anisometropia, but ocular dominance inversion should be maintained during treatment for obtaining an optimized outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Loudon E, Simons HJ (2005) The history of the treatment of amblyopia. Strabismus 13:93–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciuffreda KJ, Levi D, Selenow A (1991) Amblyopia: basic and clinical aspects. Chapter 1: history, definitions, classifications and prevalence. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 1-42

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2006) Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children with refractive correction. Ophthalmology 113:895–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2005) Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17 years. Arch Ophthalmol 123:437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, Stephens DA, Cooperative MOTAS (2004) Refractive adaptation in amblyopia: quantification of effect and implications for practice. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1552–1556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alió J, Laria C (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of amblyopia. In: Garg A, Prost ME, Azad R (eds) Surgical and medical management of pediatric ophthalmology. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd, New Delhi, pp 855-874

    Google Scholar 

  7. Menon V, Shailesh G, Sharma P, Saxena R (2008) Clinical trial of patching versus atropine penalization for the treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in older children. J AAPOS 12:493–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2006) A randomized trial to evaluate 2 hours of daily patching for strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 113:904–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2005) A randomized pilot study of near activities versus non-near activities during patching therapy for amblyopia. J AAPOS 9:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2003) A comparison of atropine and patching treatments for moderate amblyopia by patient age, cause of amblyopia, depth of amblyopia, and other factors. Ophthalmology 110:1632–1638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2002) A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol 120:268–278

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keech RV, Ottar W, Zhang L (2002) The minimum occlusion trial for the treatment of amblyopia. Ophthalmology 109:2261–2264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, Irwin M, Jones HS, Auld RJ (1997) Effectiveness of occlusion therapy in ametropic amblyopia: a pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol 81:956–961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Foley-Nolan A, McCann A, O’Keefe M (1997) Atropine penalization vs. occlusion as the primary treatment for amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 81:54–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Repka MX, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Birch E, Cotter SA, Holmes JM, Hertle RW, Hoover DL, Klimek DL, Marsh-Tootle W, Scheiman MM, Suh DW, Weakley DR, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2009) Treatment of severe amblyopia with weekend atropine: Results from 2 randomized clinical trials. J AAPOS 13:258–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaye SB, Kaye LC, Noonan C, Tripathi A, Ashwin P, Cota N, Clark D, Butcher J (2002) Combined optical and atropine penalization for the treatment of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS 6:289–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Simons K, Stein L, Sener EC, Vitale S, Guyton DL (1997) Full-time atropine, intermittent atropine, optical penalization, binocular outcome in treatment of strabismic amblyopia. Ophthalmology 104:2143–2145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. France TD, France LW (1999) Optical penalization can improve vision after occlusion treatment. J AAPOS 3:341–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McIntyre A, Fells P (1996) Bangerter foils: A new approach to the management of pathological intractable diplopia. Br Orthopt J 53:43–47

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bangerter A (1960) Die Okklusion in der Pleoptik und Orthoptik. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 136:305–331

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bangerter A (1946) Behandlung der Amblyopie. Ophthalmologica 111:220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2003) Impact of patching and atropine treatment on the child and family in the Amblyopia Treatment Study. Arch Ophthalmol 121:1625–1632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fielder AR, Irwin M, Auld R, Cocker KD, Jones HS, Moseley MJ (1995) Compliance in amblyopia therapy: objective monitoring of occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol 79:585–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Campos EC, Chiesi C, Rozzi N (1991) Intossicazione da atropina in corso di terapia antiambliopica. G It Ortotte Tec Strum Oft 8:185–188

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lowe RF (1965) Atropine treatment for amblyopia ex anopsia. Br Orthopt J 22:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abraham SV (1954) Intraepithelial cysts of the iris. Am J Ophthalmol 37:327–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Writing Committee, Rutstein RP, Quinn GE, Lazar EL, Beck RW, Bonsall DJ, Cotter SA, Crouch ER, Holmes JM, Hoover DL, Leske DA, Lorenzana IJ, Repka MX, Suh DW (2010) A randomized trial comparing Bangerter filters and patching for the treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 117(5):998–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Agervi P, Kugelberg U, Kugelberg M, Simonsson G, Fornander M, Zetterström C (2009) Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia with spectacles or in combination with translucent Bangerter filters. Ophthalmology 116:1475–1480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Holladay JT (1997) Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. J Refract Surg 13:388–391

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. North RV, Kelly ME (1991) Atropine occlusion in the treatment of strabismic amblyopia and its effect on the non-amblyopic eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 11:113–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Agervi P, Kugelberg U, Kugelberg M, Simonsson G, Fornander M, Zetterström C (2010) Randomized evaluation of spectacles plus alternate-day occlusion to treat amblyopia. Ophthalmology 117:381–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dorey SE, Adams GG, Lee JP, Sloper JJ (2001) Intensive occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 85:310–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, Irwin M, Jones HS, Auld RJ (1997) Effectiveness of occlusion therapy in ametropic amblyopia: a pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol 81:956–961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Odell NV, Leske DA, Hatt SR, Adams WE, Holmes JM (2008) The effect of Bangerter filters on optotype acuity, Vernier acuity, and contrast sensitivity. J AAPOS 12:555–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Arikan G, Yaman A, Berk AT (2005) Efficacy of occlusion treatment in amblyopia and clinical risk factors affecting the results of treatment. Strabismus 13:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hussein MA, Coats DK, Muthialu A, Cohen E, Paysse EA (2004) Risk factors for treatment failure of anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS 8:429–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mazow ML, Chuang A, Vital MC, Prager T (2000) 1999 Costenbander Lecture. Outcome study in amblyopia: treatment and practice pattern variations. J AAPOS 4:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vissum/Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Avda de Denia s/n, Edificio Vissum, 03016, Alicante, Spain

    Carlos Laria, David P. Piñero & Jorge L. Alió

  2. Departamento de Óptica, Farmacología y Anatomía, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain

    David P. Piñero

  3. Division of Ophthalmology, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain

    Jorge L. Alió

Authors
  1. Carlos Laria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David P. Piñero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jorge L. Alió
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David P. Piñero.

Additional information

This study has been supported in part by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Health, Instituto Carlos III, Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Salud “Patología ocular del envejecimiento, calidad visual y calidad de vida”, Subproyecto de Calidad Visual (RD07/0062)

The authors have no financial interest in any of the issues contained in this article and have no proprietary or commercial interest in the development of marketing of materials used in this study or discussed in this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laria, C., Piñero, D.P. & Alió, J.L. Characterization of Bangerter filter effect in mild and moderate anisometropic amblyopia: predictive factors for the visual outcome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249, 759–766 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1564-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1564-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation