Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of pupil size in video head-impulse tests

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of video head impulse tests (video-HITs) may be confounded by data artifacts of various origins, including pupil size and eyelid obstruction of the pupil. This study aimed to determine the effect of these factors on the results of video-HITs. We simulated ptosis by adopting pharmacological dilatation of the pupil in 21 healthy participants (11 women; age 24–58 years). Each participant underwent video-HITs before and after pupillary dilatation using 0.5% tropicamide. We assessed the changes in the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, corrective saccade amplitude, and frequency of eyelid flicks. After pupillary dilatation, the VOR gain decreased for both right (RAC; 1.12 \(\pm\) 0.12 vs. 1.01 \(\pm\) 0.16, p = 0.011) and left anterior canals (LACs; 1.15 \(\pm\) 0.13 vs. 0.96 \(\pm\) 0.14, p < 0.001), and right posterior canal (RPC, 1.10 \(\pm\) 0.13 vs. 0.98 \(\pm\) 0.09, p = 0.001). The corrective saccade amplitudes also decreased significantly for all four vertical canals. The frequency of eyelid flicks, however, did not change. The changes of VOR gain were positively correlated with the lid excursion in RPC (r = 0.629, p = 0.002) and LPC (r = 0.549, p = 0.010). Our study indicates that eyelid position and pupil size should be considered when interpreting the results of video-HITs, especially for the vertical canals. Pupils should be shrunk in a very well-lit room, and artifacts should be prevented by taping or lifting the eyelids as required during video-HITs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Anonymized data will be shared upon request from any qualified investigator.

References

  1. MacDougall HG, McGarvie LA, Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS, Weber KP (2013) Application of the video head impulse test to detect vertical semicircular canal dysfunction. Otol Neurotol 34:974–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi JY, Kim HJ, Kim JS (2018) Recent advances in head impulse test findings in central vestibular disorders. Neurology 90:602–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Halmagyi G, Chen L, MacDougall HG, Weber KP, McGarvie LA, Curthoys IS (2017) The video head impulse test. Front Neurol 8:258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mantokoudis G, Tehrani ASS, Kattah JC, Eibenberger K, Guede CI, Zee DS, Newman-Toker DE (2015) Quantifying the vestibulo-ocular reflex with video-oculography: nature and frequency of artifacts. Audiol Neurootol 20:39–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Trinidad-Ruiz G, Rey-Martinez J, Matiño-Soler E, Batuecas-Caletrio A, Martin-Sanz E, Perez-Fernandez N (2020) Relevance of artifact removal and number of stimuli for video head impulse test examination. Ear Hear 41:1397–1406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller NR, Walsh FB, Hoyt WF (2005) Walsh and Hoyt’s clinical neuro-ophthalmology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hosal BM, Ayer NG, Zilelioglu G, Elhan AH (2004) Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the levator aponeurosis in congenital and aponeurotic blepharoptosis. O Ophthalmic Plast Recontr Sug 20:308–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones LT, Quickert MH, Wobig JL (1975) The cure of ptosis by aponeurotic repair. Arch Ophthalmol 93:629–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SU, Kim HJ, Choi JY, Koo JW, Yang X, Kim JS (2020) Evolution in the findings of head-impulse tests during the attacks of Menière’s disease. Otol Neurotol 41:e744–e750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SH, Lee SU, Cho BH, Cho KH, Yu S, Kim BJ, Kim JS (2023) Analyses of head-impulse tests in patients with posterior circulation stroke and vestibular neuritis. Neurology 100:e2374–e2385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim HJ, Park SH, Koo JW, Kim CY, Kim YH, Han JH, Kim JS (2015) Bilaterally abnormal head impulse tests indicate a large cerebellopontine angle tumor. J Clin Neurol 12:65–74

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Curthoys IS, McGarvie LA, MacDougall HG, Burgess AM, Halmagyi GM, Rey-Martinez J, Dlugaiczyk J (2023) A review of the geometrical basis and the principles underlying the use and interpretation of the video head impulse test (vHIT) in clinical vestibular testing. Front Neurol 14:1147253

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. McGarvie LA, Martinez-Lopez M, Burgess AM, MacDougall HG, Curthoys IS (2015) Horizontal eye position affects measured vertical VOR gain on the video head impulse test. Front Neurol 6:58

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hawkins KE, Chiarovano E, Paul SS, Burgess AM, MacDougall HG, Curthoys IS (2022) Vestibular semicircular canal function as detected by video head impulse test (vHIT) is essentially unchanged in people with Parkinson’s disease compared to healthy controls. J Vestib Res 32:261–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang C, Lee J, Kang B, Lee H, Yoo M, Park H (2016) Quantitative analysis of gains and catch-up saccades of video-head-impulse testing by age in normal subjects. Clin Otolaryngol 41:532–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McGarvie LA, MacDougall HG, Halmagyi GM, Burgess AM, Weber KP, Curthoys IS (2015) The video head impulse test (vHIT) of semicircular canal function–age-dependent normative values of VOR gain in healthy subjects. Front Neurol 6:154

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mossman B, Mossman S, Purdie G, Schneider E (2015) Age dependent normal horizontal VOR gain of head impulse test as measured with video-oculography. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 44:29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansson A, Salzer J (2021) Normative video head impulse test data in subjects with and without vascular risk factors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278:2619–2624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pogson JM, Taylor RL, Bradshaw AP, McGarvie L, D’Souza M, Halmagyi GM, Welgampola MS (2019) The human vestibulo-ocular reflex and saccades: normal subjects and the effect of age. J Neurophysiol 122:336–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim TH, Kim MB (2018) Effect of aging and direction of impulse in video head impulse test. Laryngoscope 128:E228–E233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tian J, Crane BT, Demer JL (2000) Vestibular catch-up saccades in labyrinthine deficiency. Exp Brain Res 131:448–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Colagiorgio P, Versino M, Colnaghi S, Quaglieri S, Manfrin M, Zamaro E, Mantokoudis G, Zee DS, Ramat S (2017) New insights into vestibular-saccade interaction based on covert corrective saccades in patients with unilateral vestibular deficits. J Neurophysiol 117:2324–2338

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Scherer M, Schubert MC (2010) High-velocity angular vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation to position error signals. J Neurol Phys Ther 34:82–86

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Nechel C, Bostan A, Duquesne U, Hautefort C, Toupet M (2019) Visual input is the main trigger and parametric determinant for catch-up saccades during video head impulse test in bilateral vestibular loss. Front Neurol 9:1138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Iwasaki S, Kamogashira T, Fujimoto C, Kabaya K, Kinoshita M, Yamasoba T (2022) The role of neck input in producing corrective saccades in the head impulse test. Front Neurol 13:881411

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Saonanon P (2014) Update on Asian eyelid anatomy and clinical relevance. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25:436–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2022R1A4A1018869).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H-JY analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. J-HL, J-HL, EP, B-JK and J-SK analyzed and interpreted the data, and revised the manuscript. S-UL designed and conceptualized the study, interpreted the data, and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun-Uk Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Drs. Yoon, Jung-Hun Lee, Joo-Hyeong Lee, E, Park, and S.U. Lee report no disclosures. Dr. B.J. Kim serves as an Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Clinical Neurology. Dr. J.S. Kim serves as an associate editor of Frontiers in Neuro-otology and on the editorial boards of Frontiers in Neuro-ophthalmology, Journal of Neuro-ophthalmology, Journal of Vestibular Research, and Clinical and Translational Neuroscience.

Study ethics

This study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was performed according to the guidelines of the Institutional Review Board of Korea University Medical Center (2023AN0246).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 KB)

Video. Head-impulses in the left anterior–right posterior (LARP) plane. At baseline, the measurements of the pupil are not interrupted by the eyelids. However, the eyelid flicks (red rectangles) and blinking artifacts (green rectangle) hamper the measurements of the eye movements after pupil dilatation. Blue and black lines represent the vertical eye position and velocity of the right eye, respectively. (MP4 5401 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, HJ., Lee, JH., Lee, JH. et al. Effects of pupil size in video head-impulse tests. J Neurol 271, 819–825 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-12026-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-12026-0

Keywords

Navigation