Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical assessment of deficits after SAH: hasty neurosurgeons and accurate neurologists

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For survivors of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), somatic and cognitive deficits can affect long-term outcomes. We were interested in comparing the deficits identified in SAH patients, including cognitive deficits, at discharge by neurosurgeons and deficits identified by neurologists upon admission to the rehabilitation unit on the same day. The assessment of deficits might have an impact on referring patients to rehabilitation. This retrospective study included 494 SAH patients treated between 2005 and 2010. Of these, 50 patients were discharged to an affiliated rehabilitation unit. Deficits were grouped into 18 categories and summarized into three groups: major somatic, minor somatic, and cognitive deficits. Major somatic deficits were identified in 16 and 20 patients (p = 0.53), minor somatic deficits in 16 and 44 (p < 0.0001) patients, and cognitive deficits in 36 and 45 (p < 0.04) patients by neurosurgeons and neurologists, respectively. The absolute number of deficits in daily activities identified by the neurosurgeon and neurologist were 21 and 31 major somatic deficits (p = 0.2), 18 and 97 minor somatic deficits (p < 0.0001), and 61 and 147 cognitive deficits (p < 0.0001), respectively. Significant differences in assessment of cognitive and minor somatic deficits between neurosurgeons and neurologists exist. Based on these findings, it is evident that for the neurosurgeon, there needs to be an increased awareness of the assessment of cognitive deficits and a more routine interdisciplinary approach, including the use of neuropsychological evaluations, to ensure a better triage of patients to rehabilitation or for discharge home.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM et al (2005) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meyer B, Ringel F, Winter Y et al (2010) Health-related quality of life in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis 30:423–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hackett ML, Anderson CS (2000) Health outcomes 1 year after subarachnoid hemorrhage: an international population-based study. The Australian Cooperative Research on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study Group. Neurology 55:658–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Visser-Meily JM, Rhebergen ML, Rinkel GJ, van Zandvoort MJ, Post MW (2009) Long-term health-related quality of life after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: relationship with psychological symptoms and personality characteristics. Stroke 40:1526–1529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Powell J, Kitchen N, Heslin J, Greenwood R (2002) Psychosocial outcomes at three and nine months after good neurological recovery from aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: predictors and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72:772–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Springer MV, Schmidt JM, Wartenberg KE, Frontera JA, Badjatia N, Mayer SA (2009) Predictors of global cognitive impairment 1 year after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 65:1043–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Passier PE, Visser-Meily JM, van Zandvoort MJ, Post MW, Rinkel GJ, van Heugten C (2010) Prevalence and determinants of cognitive complaints after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis 29:557–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim DH, Haney CL, Van Ginhoven G (2005) Utility of outcome measures after treatment for intracranial aneurysms: a prospective trial involving 520 patients. Stroke 36:792–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saciri BM, Kos N (2002) Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: outcomes of early rehabilitation after surgical repair of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72:334–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No funding was received for this work. Dr. Thomas Nyffeler had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. The authors received editorial support for the final version of the manuscript by Susan Wieting, Bern University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Publications Office, Bern, Switzerland.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Nyffeler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fung, C., Beck, J., Lauber, L. et al. Clinical assessment of deficits after SAH: hasty neurosurgeons and accurate neurologists. J Neurol 259, 2198–2201 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6483-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6483-9

Keywords

Navigation