Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modulating processes within the central nervous system is central to therapeutic control of multiple sclerosis

  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically considered to be an autoimmune demyelinating disease, multiple sclerosis is now recognized to be characterized by significant axonal and neuronal pathology. Addressing this neurodegenerative component of the disease is an important treatment objective, since axonal injury is believed to underlie the accumulation of disability and disease progression. The precise relationship between the inflammatory and neurodegenerative components in multiple sclerosis remains poorly elucidated, although neurodegeneration appears to be at least partially independent from neuroinflammation. The mechanisms underlying axonal injury appear complex and are likely to be multifactorial. Specific treatment strategies need to be developed that act within the central nervous system to prevent neurodegeneration and need to be provided from the earliest stages of disease. It is likely that immunomodulatory treatments acting purely in the periphery will provide only indirect and not direct neuroprotection. A promising approach is to enhance neuroprotective autoimmunity inside the brain, believed to be mediated, at least in part, by the release of neurotrophic factors within the nervous system from infiltrating immune cells. Such a beneficial process would be inhibited by a non-selective immunosuppressive strategy. In summary, treatments of multiple sclerosis should take into account the heterogeneous pathophysiology of the disease. The pathogenic process in the central nervous system itself should be the major focus in multiple sclerosis therapy in order to protect against demyelination and axonal loss and to promote remyelination and regeneration directly in the target tissue, independently of peripheral immune status. In conclusion, selective treatment strategies aimed at preventing axonal injury within the central nervous system are required to complement existing, peripherally acting treatments targeting the immune system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arredondo LR, Deng C, Ratts RB, et al. (2001) Role of nerve growth factor in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Eur J Immunol 31:625–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Besser M, Wank R (1999) Cutting edge: clonally restricted production of the neurotrophins brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 mRNA by human immune cells and Th1/Th2-polarized expression of their receptors. J Immunol 162:6303–6306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bitsch A, Schuchardt J, Bunkowski S, et al. (2000) Acute axonal injury in multiple sclerosis. Correlation with demyelination and inflammation. Brain 123:1174–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bo L, Vedeler CA, Nyland H, et al. (2003) Intracortical multiple sclerosis lesions are not associated with increased lymphocyte infiltration. Mult Scler 9:323–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Braun A, Lommatzsch M, Mannsfeldt A, et al. (1999) Cellular sources of enhanced brain-derived neurotrophic factor production in a mouse model of allergic inflammation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 21:537–546

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brundula V, Rewcastle NB, Metz LM, et al. (2002) Targeting leukocyte MMPs and transmigration: minocycline as a potential therapy for multiple sclerosis. Brain 125:1297–1308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Butzkueven H, Zhang JG, Soilu-Hanninen M, et al. (2002) LIF receptor signaling limits immune-mediated demyelination by enhancing oligodendrocyte survival. Nat Med 8:613–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cannella B, Hoban CJ, Gao YL, et al. (1998) The neuregulin, glial growth factor 2, diminishes autoimmune demyelination and enhances remyelination in a chronic relapsing model for multiple sclerosis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 95:10100–10105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cannella B, Pitt D, Capello E, Raine CS (2000) Insulin-like growth factor-1 fails to enhance central nervous system myelin repair during autoimmune demyelination. Am J Pathol 157:933–943

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen M, Valenzuela RM, Dhib-Jalbut S (2003) Glatiramer acetate-reactive T cells produce brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Neurol Sci 215:37–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chitnis T, Imitola J, Khoury SJ (2005) Therapeutic strategies to prevent neurodegeneration and promote regeneration in multiple sclerosis. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 5:11–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coles AJ, Wing MG, Molyneux P, et al. (1999) Monoclonal antibody treatment exposes three mechanisms underlying the clinical course of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 46:296–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Compston A, Coles A (2002) Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 359:1221–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Filippi M, Bozzali M, Rovaris M, et al. (2003) Evidence for widespread axonal damage at the earliest clinical stage of multiple sclerosis. Brain 126:433–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flügel A, Matsumuro K, Neumann H, et al. (2001) Anti-inflammatory activity of nerve growth factor in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: inhibition of monocyte transendothelial migration. Eur J Immunol 31:11–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Giuliani F, Yong VW (2003) Immunemediated neurodegeneration and neuroprotection in MS. Int MS J 10:122–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gravel C, Gotz R, Lorrain A, Sendtner M (1997) Adenoviral gene transfer of ciliary neurotrophic factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor leads to long-term survival of axotomized motor neurons. Nat Med 3:765–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grigoriadis N, Ben-Hur T, Karussis D, Milonas I (2004) Axonal damage in multiple sclerosis: a complex issue in a complex disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 106:211–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kerschensteiner M, Gallmeier E, Behrens L, et al. (1999) Activated human T cells, B cells and monocytes produce brain-derived neurotrophic factor in vitro and in inflammatory brain lesions: a neuroprotective role of inflammation? J Exp Med 189:865–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kerschensteiner M, Stadelmann C, Dechant G, et al. (2003) Neurotrophic cross-talk between the nervous and immune systems: implications for neurological diseases. Ann Neurol 53:292–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kieseier BC, Hartung HP (2003) Multiple paradigm shifts in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 16:247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Korner H, Goodsall AL, Lemckert FA, et al. (1995) Unimpaired autoreactive T cell traffic within the central nervous system during tumor necrosis factor receptor-mediated inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92:11066–11070

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Korner H, Lemckert FA, Chaudhri G, et al. (1997) Tumor necrosis factor blockade in actively induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis prevents clinical disease despite activated T cell infiltration to the central nervous system. Eur J Immunol 27:1973–1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu X, Linnington C, Webster HD, et al. (1997) Insulin-like growth factor-I treatment reduces immune cell responses in acute non-demyelinative experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neurosci Res 47:531–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lovett-Racke AE, Bittner P, Cross AH, et al. (1998) Regulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) and IGF-1/IGF-binding protein-3 complex (IGF-1/IGFBP3). J Clin Invest 101:1797–1804

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Metz LM, Zhang Y, Yeung M, et al. (2004) Minocycline reduces gadolinium-enhancing magnetic resonance imaging lesions in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 55:756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moalem G, Leibowitz-Amit R, Yoles E, et al. (1999) Autoimmune T cells protect neurons from secondary degeneration after central nervous system axotomy. Nat Med 5:49–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Neuhaus O, Farina C, Wekerle H, Hohlfeld R (2001) Mechanisms of action of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 56:702–708

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG (2000) Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 343:938–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Peterson JW, Bo L, Mork S, Chang A, Trapp BD (2001) Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons, and reduced inflammation in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol 50:389–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Popovic N, Schubart A, Goetz BD, et al. (2002) Inhibition of autoimmune encephalomyelitis by a tetracycline. Ann Neurol 51:215–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schwartz M, Kipnis J (2005) Protective autoimmunity and neuroprotection in inflammatory and noninflammatory neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurol Sci 233:163–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stadelmann C, Kerschensteiner M, Misgeld T, et al. (2002) BDNF and gp145trkB in multiple sclerosis brain lesions: neuroprotective interactions between immune and neuronal cells? Brain 125:75–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Steinman L (2001) Multiple sclerosis: a two-stage disease. Nat Immunol 2:762–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Teismann P, Schulz JB (2004) Cellular pathology of Parkinson’s disease: astrocytes, microglia and inflammation. Cell Tissue Res 318:149–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. The Lenercept Multiple Sclerosis Study Group and The University of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group (1999) TNF neutralization in MS: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study. Neurology 53:457–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tikka T, Fiebich BL, Goldsteins G, et al. (2001) Minocycline, a tetracycline derivative, is neuroprotective against excitotoxicity by inhibiting activation and proliferation of microglia. J Neurosci 21:2580–2588

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Villoslada P, Hauser SL, Bartke I, et al. (2000) Human nerve growth factor protects common marmosets against autoimmune encephalomyelitis by switching the balance of T helper cell type 1 and 2 cytokines within the central nervous system. J Exp Med 191:1799–1806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wiendl H, Hohlfeld R (2002) Therapeutic approaches in multiple sclerosis: lessons from failed and interrupted treatment trials. BioDrugs 16:183–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ziemssen T, Kumpfel T, Klinkert WE, et al. (2002) Glatiramer acetate-specific T-helper 1- and 2-type cell lines produce BDNF: implications for multiple sclerosis therapy. Brain 125:2381–2391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ziemssen T (2004) Neuroprotection and glatiramer acetate: the possible role in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Adv Exp Med Biol 541:111–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ziemssen T, Ziemssen F (2005) The role of the humanal immune system in multiple sclerosis (MS) and its animal model experimental automimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Autoimmun Rev 4:460–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tjalf Ziemssen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ziemssen, T. Modulating processes within the central nervous system is central to therapeutic control of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 252 (Suppl 5), v38–v45 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-5007-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-5007-2

Key words

Navigation