Abstract
Objective and unbiased validation studies over a significant number of cases are required to get a more solid picture on craniofacial superimposition reliability. It will not be possible to compare the performance of existing and upcoming methods for craniofacial superimposition without a common forensic database available for the research community. Skull–face overlay is a key task within craniofacial superimposition that has a direct influence on the subsequent task devoted to evaluate the skull–face relationships. In this work, we present the procedure to create for the first time such a dataset. We have also created a database with 19 skull–face overlay cases for which we are trying to overcome legal issues that allow us to make it public. The quantitative analysis made in the segmentation and registration stages, together with the visual assessment of the 19 face-to-face overlays, allows us to conclude that the results can be considered as a gold standard. With such a ground truth dataset, a new horizon is opened for the development of new automatic methods whose performance could be now objectively measured and compared against previous and future proposals. Additionally, other uses are expected to be explored to better understand the visual evaluation process of craniofacial relationships in craniofacial identification. It could be very useful also as a starting point for further studies on the prediction of the resulting facial morphology after corrective or reconstructive interventionism in maxillofacial surgery.
Notes
References
Burns KR (2012) Forensic anthropology training manual, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River
Cattaneo C (2007) Forensic anthropology: development of a classical discipline in the new millennium. Forensic Sci Int 165(2–3):185–193
Yoshino M (2012) Craniofacial superimposition. In: Wilkinson C, Rynn C (eds) Craniofacial identification. University Press, Cambridge, pp 238–253
Aulsebrook WA, Iscan MY, Slabbert JM, Beckert P (1995) Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey. Forensic Sci Int 75(2–3):101–120
Stephan CN (2009) Craniofacial identification: techniques of facial approximation and CFS. In: Blau S, Ubelaker DH (eds) Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. Left Coast, California, pp 304–321
Damas S, Cordón O, Ibáñez O, Santamaría J, Alemán I, Botella M (2011) Forensic identification by computer-aided CFS: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 43(4):27
Al-Amad S, McCullough M, Graham J, Clement J, Hill A (2006) Craniofacial identification by computer-mediated superimposition. J Forensic Odontostomatol 24(2):47–52
Glaister J, Brash JC (1937) Medico-legal aspects of the Ruxton case. E and S Livingstone, Edinburgh
Galton F (1896) The Bertillon system of identification. Nature 54:569–570
Broca P (1875) Instructions craniologiques et craniométriques de la Société d’Anthrpologie de Paris [in French]. In Masson G (ed), vii Paris
Ubelaker DH, Bubniak E, Odonnell G (1992) Computer-assisted photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 37(3):750–762
Dorion RB (1983) Photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 28(3):724–734
Brocklebank LM, Holmgren CJ (1989) Development of equipment for the standardization of skull photographs in personal identifications by photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 34(5):1214–1221
Maat GJ (1989) The positioning and magnification of faces and skulls for photographic superimposition. Forensic Sci Int 41(3):225–235
Helmer R, Grüner O (1976) Vereinfachte Schädelidentifizierung nach dem Superprojektionsverfahren mit Hilfe einer Video-Anlage [in German]. Z für Rechtsmedizin 80 (3):v
Fenton TW, Heard AN, Sauer NJ (2008) Skull-photo superimposition and border deaths: identification through exclusion and the failure to exclude. J Forensic Sci 53(1):34–40
Seta S, Yoshino M (1993) A combined apparatus for photographic and video superimposition. In: Iscan MY, Helmer R (eds) Forensic analysis of the skull. Wiley, New York, pp 161–169
Lan Y, Cai D (1993) Technical advances in skull-photo superimposition. In Iscan MY and Helmer R
Pesce Delfino V, Colonna M, Vacca E, Potente F, Introna F (1986) Computer-aided skull/face superimposition. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 7(3):201–212
Ricci A, Marella GL, Apostol MA (2006) A new experimental approach to computer-aided face/skull identification in forensic anthropology. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 27(1):46–49
Ghosh AK, Sinha P (2001) An economised craniofacial identification system. Forensic Sci Int 117(1–2):109–119
Nickerson BA, Fitzhorn PA, Koch SK, Charney M (1991) A methodology for near-optimal computational superimposition of two-dimensional digital facial photographs and three-dimensional cranial surface meshes. J Forensic Sci 36(2):480–500
Huete MI, Kahana T, Ibáñez O (2014) Past, present, and future of CFS: literature and international surveys. University of Granada, Spain, Tech. Rep. DECSAI 2014–01. Submitted to legal medicine
Ubelaker DH (2000) A history of Smithsonian-FBI collaboration in forensic anthropology, especially in regard to facial imagery [abstract]. Forensic Sci Commun 2 (4)
Ibáñez O, Ballerini L, Cordón O, Damas S, Santamaría J (2009) An experimental study on the applicability of evolutionary algorithms to CFS in forensic identification. Inf Sci 179(23):3998–4028
Ibáñez O, Cordón O, Damas S, Santamaría J (2011) Modeling the skull–face overlay uncertainty using fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 19(5):946–959
Ibáñez O, Cordón O, Damas S (2012) A cooperative coevolutionary approach dealing with the skull-face overlay uncertainty in forensic identification by CFS. Soft Comput 18(5):797–808
Campomanes-Alvarez B, Ibáñez O, Navarro F, Alemán I, Cordón O, Damas S (2014) Dispersion assessment in the location of facial landmarks on photographs. Int J Legal Med:In press
De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR (2009) Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:609–625
Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F (2006) Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 130:410–416
Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Noujeim M, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, Langlais RP (2006) Image artifact in dental cone-beam CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101:652–657
Botsch M, Kobbelt L, Pauly M, Alliez P, Levy B (2010) Polygon mesh processing. AK Peters
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward SR, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 9:1323–1341
Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans SystMan Cybern 3(6):610–621
Mitchell T (1997) Machine learning. McGraw Hill
Loh WY (2011) Classification and regression trees. Wiley Interdisc Rew Data Min Knowl Disc 1(1):14–23
Quinlan JR (1993) C4.5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann
Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer BRP, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 11(1):10–18
Zitova B, Flusser J (2003) Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vision Comput 21(11):977–1000
Faugeras O (1993) Three-dimensional computer vision. A geometric viewpoint. MIT Press, Cambridge
Talbi E (2009) Metaheuristics: from design to implementation. Wiley
Geisser S (1993) Predictive inference. Chapman and Hall, New York
Gwen R, Swennen J, Schutyser F (2006) Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 130:410–416
Grauer D, Cevidanes LSH, Styner MA, Heulfe I, Harmon ET, Zhu H, Proffit WR (2010) Accuracy and landmark error calculation using cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Angle Orthod 80(2):286–294
Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Marchal G, Sanderink G, Jacobs R (2009) Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 71(3):461–468
Moores BM, Regulla D (2011) A review of the scientific basis for radiation protection of the patient. Radiat Prot Dosim 147(1–2):22–29
Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD (2010) Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 39:323–335
Damas S, Cordón O, Santamaría J (2011) Medical image registration using evolutionary computation: an experimental study. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 6(4):26–42
Goshtasby AA (2005) 2-D and 3-D image registration for medical, remote sensing, and industrial applications. Wiley interscience
Salvi J, Matabosch C, Fofi D, Forest J (2007) A review of recent range image registration methods with accuracy evaluation. Image Vis Comput 25(5):578–596
Cummaudo M, Guerzoni M, Marasciuolo L, Gibelli D, Cigada A, Obertovà Z, Ratnayake M, Poppa P, Gabriel P, Rizt-Timme S, Cattaneo C (2013) Pitfalls at the root of facial assessment on photographs: a quantitative study of accuracy in positioning facial landmarks. Int J Legal Med 127:699–706
Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bergé SJ (2011) Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40(4):341–345
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the participants that give us the permission to work with both their head scans and facial photographs, Drs. Luca Contardo and Domenico Dalessandri for the support provided during images acquisition and head scanning. The University Hospital of Trieste and Ortoscan for supporting this research. This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad under the SOCOVIFI2 project (refs. TIN2012-38525-C01/C02, http://www.softcomputing.es/socovifi/), the Andalusian Department of Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa under project TIC2011-7745, the Principality of Asturias Government under the project with reference CT13-55, and the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research technological development and demonstration under the MEPROCS project (Grant Agreement No. 285624), including European Development Regional Funds (EDRF). Mrs. C. Campomanes-Álvarez’s work has been supported by Spanish MECD FPU grant AP-2012-4285. Dr. Ibañez’s work has been supported by Spanish MINECO Juan de la Cierva Fellowship JCI-2012-15359.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ibáñez, O., Cavalli, F., Campomanes-Álvarez, B.R. et al. Ground truth data generation for skull–face overlay. Int J Legal Med 129, 569–581 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1074-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1074-1