Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction and prevention of psychosis: current progress and future tasks

  • Review
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prevention of psychoses has been intensively investigated within the past two decades, and particularly, prediction has been much advanced. Depending on the applied risk indicators, current criteria are associated with average, yet significantly heterogeneous transition rates of ≥30 % within 3 years, further increasing with longer follow-up periods. Risk stratification offers a promising approach to advance current prediction as it can help to reduce heterogeneity of transition rates and to identify subgroups with specific needs and response patterns, enabling a targeted intervention. It may also be suitable to improve risk enrichment. Current results suggest the future implementation of multi-step risk algorithms combining sensitive risk detection by cognitive basic symptoms (COGDIS) and ultra-high-risk (UHR) criteria with additional individual risk estimation by a prognostic index that relies on further predictors such as additional clinical indicators, functional impairment, neurocognitive deficits, and EEG and structural MRI abnormalities, but also considers resilience factors. Simply combining COGDIS and UHR criteria in a second step of risk stratification produced already a 4-year hazard rate of 0.66. With regard to prevention, two recent meta-analyses demonstrated that preventive measures enable a reduction in 12-month transition rates by 54–56 % with most favorable numbers needed to treat of 9–10. Unfortunately, psychosocial functioning, another important target of preventive efforts, did not improve. However, these results are based on a relatively small number of trials; and more methodologically sound studies and a stronger consideration of individual profiles of clinical needs by modular intervention programs are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Addington J, Cornblatt BA, Cadenhead KS et al (2011) At clinical high risk for psychosis: outcome for nonconverters. Am J Psychiatry 168:800–805

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Addington J, Epstein I, Liu L et al (2011) A randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis. Schizophr Res 125:54–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amminger GP, Schafer MR, Papageorgiou K et al (2010) Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids for indicated prevention of psychotic disorders: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67:146–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Antonini L, Mollica C, Auriti A et al (2014) A prognostic index for risk stratification for acute heart failure and death in subjects with ischemic cardiomyopathy and cardiac defibrillator. Heart Vessels. doi:10.1007/s00380-014-0494-7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barch DM, Bustillo J, Gaebel W et al (2013) Logic and justification for dimensional assessment of symptoms and related clinical phenomena in psychosis: relevance to DSM-5. Schizophr Res 150:15–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bechdolf A, Muller H, Stutzer H et al (2011) Rationale and baseline characteristics of prevent: a second-generation intervention trial in subjects at-risk (prodromal) of developing first-episode psychosis evaluating cognitive behavior therapy, aripiprazole, and placebo for the prevention of psychosis. Schizophr Bull 37(Suppl 2):S111–S121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bechdolf A, Wagner M, Ruhrmann S et al (2012) Preventing progression to first-episode psychosis in early initial prodromal states. Br J Psychiatry 200:22–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bell RQ (1992) Multiple-risk cohorts and segmenting risk as solutions to the problem of false positives in risk for the major psychoses. Psychiatry 55:370–381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bodatsch M, Ruhrmann S, Müller R, Klosterkötter J, Brockhaus-Dumke A (2010) Mismatch negativity is reduced in schizophrenia patients with deficit syndrome. Schizophr Res 117:360–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bodatsch M, Ruhrmann S, Wagner M et al (2011) Prediction of psychosis by mismatch negativity. Biol Psychiatry 69:959–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bourque F, van der Ven E, Fusar-Poli P, Malla A (2012) Immigration, social environment and onset of psychotic disorders. Curr Pharm Des 18:518–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown AS (2011) The environment and susceptibility to schizophrenia. Prog Neurobiol 93:23–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cannon TD, Cadenhead K, Cornblatt B et al (2008) Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in north America. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65:28–37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Carrion RE, McLaughlin D, Goldberg TE et al (2013) Prediction of functional outcome in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry 70:1133–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clouth J (2004) Kosten der frühverrentung am beispiel der schizophrenie [costs of early retirement: the case of schizophrenia]. Psychiatry Prax 31(Suppl 2):S238–S245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cornblatt BA, Carrion RE, Addington J et al (2012) Risk factors for psychosis: impaired social and role functioning. Schizophr Bull 38:1247–1257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cornblatt BA, Lencz T, Smith CW et al (2003) The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neurodevelopmental perspective. Schizophr Bull 29:633–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Forhan M, Zagorski BM, Marzonlini S, Oh P, Alter DA (2013) Predicting exercise adherence for patients with obesity and diabetes referred to a cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention program. Can J Diabetes 37:189–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fusar-Poli P, Bechdolf A, Taylor MJ et al (2013) At risk for schizophrenic or affective psychoses? A meta-analysis of DSM/ICD diagnostic outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk. Schizophr Bull 39:923–932

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fusar-Poli P, Bonoldi I, Yung AR et al (2012) Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk. Arch Gen Psychiatry 69:220–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fusar-Poli P, Borgwardt S, Bechdolf A et al (2013) The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review. JAMA Psychiatry 70:107–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fusar-Poli P, Deste G, Smieskova R et al (2012) Cognitive functioning in prodromal psychosis: a meta-analysis of cognitive functioning in prodromal psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 69:562–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gordon RS Jr (1983) An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Rep 98:107–109

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Jacobi F et al (2011) Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 21:718–779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Häfner H, Maurer K, Löffler W et al (1998) The abc schizophrenia study: a preliminary overview of the results. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatry Epidemiol 33:380–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Häfner H, Nowotny B, Loffler W, an der Heiden W, Maurer K (1995) When and how does schizophrenia produce social deficits? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 246:17–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Haro JM, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Bitter I et al (2014) Roamer: roadmap for mental health research in Europe. Int J method psychiatric res 23(Suppl 1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Howes OD, Fusar-Poli P, Bloomfield M, Selvaraj S, McGuire P (2012) From the prodrome to chronic schizophrenia: the neurobiology underlying psychotic symptoms and cognitive impairments. Curr Pharm Des 18:459–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hutton P, Taylor PJ (2014) Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 44:449–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ising HK, Veling W, Loewy RL et al (2012) The validity of the 16-item version of the prodromal questionnaire (pq-16) to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population. Schizophr Bull 38:1288–1296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jääskeläinen E, Juola P, Hirvonen N et al (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis of recovery in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 39:1296–1306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kidd SA (2013) From social experience to illness experience: reviewing the psychological mechanisms linking psychosis with social context. Can J psychiatry Revue canadienne de psychiatrie 58:52–58

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kim KR, Song YY, Park JY et al (2013) The relationship between psychosocial functioning and resilience and negative symptoms in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 47:762–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kirkbride JB, Fearon P, Morgan C et al (2006) Heterogeneity in incidence rates of schizophrenia and other psychotic syndromes: findings from the 3-center AeSOP study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:250–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Klosterkötter J (2008) Indicated prevention of schizophrenia. Dtsch Arztebl Int 105:532–539

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Klosterkötter J, Hellmich M, Steinmeyer EM, Schultze-Lutter F (2001) Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58:158–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Klosterkötter J, Schultze-Lutter F (2010) Prevention and early treatment. In: Helmchen H, Sartorius N (eds) Ethics in psychiatry—European contributions. Springer Science + Business Media B.V, Heidelberg, pp 235–262

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Klosterkötter J, Schultze-Lutter F, Bechdolf A, Ruhrmann S (2011) Prediction and prevention of schizophrenia: what has been achieved and where to go next? World Psychiatry 10:165–174

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Klosterkötter J, Schultze-Lutter F, Ruhrmann S (2008) Kraepelin and psychotic prodromal conditions. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 258:74–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Köhn D, Pukrop R, Niedersteberg A et al (2004) pathways to care: help-seeking behavior in first-episode psychosis. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatry 72:635–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Koutsouleris N, Riecher-Rössler A, Meisenzahl EM et al (2014) Detecting the psychosis prodrome across high-risk populations using neuroanatomical biomarkers. Schizophr Bull. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu078

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lee TY, Shin YS, Shin NY et al (2014) Neurocognitive function as a possible marker for remission from clinical high risk for psychosis. Schizophr Res 153:48–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lip GY, Edwards SJ (2006) Stroke prevention with aspirin, warfarin and ximelagatran in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res 118:321–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Marshall M, Lockwood A (2004) Early intervention for psychosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004718

  45. McGlashan T, Walsh B, Woods SW (2010) The psychosis-risk syndrome. Handbook for diagnosis and follow-up. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  46. McGlashan TH, Zipursky RB, Perkins D et al (2006) Randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus placebo in patients prodromally symptomatic for psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 163:790–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. McGorry PD, Nelson B, Phillips LJ et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial of interventions for young people at ultra-high risk of psychosis: twelve-month outcome. Journal clin psychiatry 74:349–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. McGorry PD, Yung AR, Phillips LJ (2003) The “close-in” or ultra high-risk model: a safe and effective strategy for research and clinical intervention in prepsychotic mental disorder. Schizophr Bull 29:771–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. McGorry PD, Yung AR, Phillips LJ et al (2002) Randomized controlled trial of interventions designed to reduce the risk of progression to first-episode psychosis in a clinical sample with subthreshold symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:921–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Michel C, Ruhrmann S, Schimmelmann BG, Klosterkötter J, Schultze-Lutter F (2014) A stratified model for psychosis prediction in clinical practice. Schizophr Bull. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.01.025

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Michel C, Schimmelmann BG, Kupferschmid S, Siegwart M, Schultze-Lutter F (2014) Reliability of telephone assessments of at-risk criteria of psychosis: a comparison to face-to-face interviews. Schizophr Res 153:251–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Miklowitz DJ, O’Brien MP, Schlosser DA et al (2014) Family-focused treatment for adolescents and young adults at high risk for psychosis: results of a randomized trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 53:848–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Morrison AP, French P, Stewart SL et al (2012) Early detection and intervention evaluation for people at risk of psychosis: multisite randomised controlled trial. BMJ 344:e2233

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Morrison AP, French P, Walford L et al (2004) Cognitive therapy for the prevention of psychosis in people at ultra-high risk: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 185:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Mössner R, Schuhmacher A, Wagner M et al (2010) Daoa/g72 predicts the progression of prodromal syndromes to first episode psychosis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 260:209–215

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Mrazek PJ, Haggerty HJ (1994) Reducing risks for mental disorders: frontiers for preventive research. Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nelson B, Yuen HP, Wood SJ et al (2013) Long-term follow-up of a group at ultra high risk (“prodromal”) for psychosis: the pace 400 study. JAMA Psychiatry 70:793–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Nieman DH, Ruhrmann S, Dragt S et al (2013) Psychosis prediction: stratification of risk estimation with information-processing and premorbid functioning variables. Schizophr Bull. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbt145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Nieman DH, Velthorst E, Becker HE et al (2013) The strauss and carpenter prognostic scale in subjects clinically at high risk of psychosis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 127:53–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Nuechterlein KH, Dawson ME, Gitlin M et al (1992) Developmental processes in schizophrenic disorders: longitudinal studies of vulnerability and stress. Schizophr Bull 18:387–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Olvet DM, Carrion RE, Auther AM, Cornblatt BA (2013) Self-awareness of functional impairment in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. doi:10.1111/eip.12086

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Perez VB, Woods SW, Roach BJ et al (2014) Automatic auditory processing deficits in schizophrenia and clinical high-risk patients: forecasting psychosis risk with mismatch negativity. Biol Psychiatr 75:459–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Perkins DO, Jeffries CD, Addington J et al (2014) Towards a psychosis risk blood diagnostic for persons experiencing high-risk symptoms: preliminary results from the napls project. Schizophr Bull. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu099

    Google Scholar 

  64. Piskulic D, Addington J, Cadenhead KS et al (2012) Negative symptoms in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis. Psychiatry Res 196:220–224

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Preti A, Cella M (2010) Randomized-controlled trials in people at ultra high risk of psychosis: a review of treatment effectiveness. Schizophr Res 123:30–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Pukrop R, Ruhrmann S (2012) Neurocognitive indicators of high-risk states for psychosis. In: Borgwardt S, McGuire P, Fusar Poli P (eds) Vulnerability to psychosis: from neuroscience to psychopathology. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 73–94

    Google Scholar 

  67. Riecher-Rössler A, Aston J, Ventura J et al (2008) the basel screening instrument for psychosis (BSIP): development, structure, reliability and validity. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 76:207–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Riecher-Rössler A, Pflueger MO, Aston J et al (2009) Efficacy of using cognitive status in predicting psychosis: a 7-year follow-up. Biol Psychiatry 66:1023–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Rössler W, Salize HJ, van Os J, Riecher-Rössler A (2005) Size of burden of schizophrenia and psychotic disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 15:399–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Ruhrmann S, Klosterkötter J, Bodatsch M et al (2012) Pharmacological prevention and treatment in clinical at-risk states for psychosis. Curr Pharm Des 18:550–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Ruhrmann S, Klosterkötter J, Bodatsch M et al (2012) Chances and risks of predicting psychosis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 262(Suppl 2):S85–S90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J (2003) Early detection and intervention in the initial prodromal phase of schizophrenia. Pharmacopsychiatry 36(Suppl 3):S162–S167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J (2010) Probably at-risk, but certainly ill—advocating the introduction of a psychosis spectrum disorder in DSM-V. Schizophr Res 120:23–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J (2010) Sub-threshold states of psychosis—a challenge to diagnosis and treatment. Clin Neuropsychiatry 7:72–87

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Salokangas RK et al (2010) Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adults at high risk: results from the prospective European prediction of psychosis study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67:241–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Salokangas RK, Heinimaa M, From T et al (2014) Short-term functional outcome and premorbid adjustment in clinical high-risk patients. Results of the epos project. Eur Psychiatry 29:371–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Salokangas RK, Nieman DH, Heinimaa M et al (2013) Psychosocial outcome in patients at clinical high risk of psychosis: a prospective follow-up. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 48:303–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Salokangas RKR, Ruhrmann S, von Reventlow HG et al (2012) Axis i diagnoses and transition to psychosis in clinical high-risk patients epos project: prospective follow-up of 245 clinical high-risk outpatients in four countries. Schizophr Res 138:192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Schaffner N, Schimmelmann BG, Niedersteberg A, Schultze-Lutter F (2012) pathways-to-care for first-episode psychotic patients–an overview of international studies. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 80:72–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Schimmelmann BG, Walger P, Schultze-Lutter F (2013) The significance of at-risk symptoms for psychosis in children and adolescents. Can J psychiatry Revue canadienne de psychiatrie 58:32–40

    Google Scholar 

  81. Schmidt SJ, Grunert VM, Schimmelmann BG, Schultze-Lutter F, Michel C (2014) Differences in coping, self-efficacy, and external control beliefs between patients at-risk for psychosis and patients with first-episode psychosis. Psychiatry Res 219:95–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Schmidt SJ, Schultze-Lutter F, Schimmelmann BG et al (2015) EPA guidance on the early intervention in clinical high-risk states of psychoses. European Psychiatry (in press)

  83. Schultze-Lutter F (2009) Subjective symptoms of schizophrenia in research and the clinic: the basic symptom concept. Schizophr Bull 35:5–8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Schultze-Lutter F, Addington J, Ruhrmann S, Klosterkötter J (2007) Schizophrenia proneness instrument - adult version (spi-a). Giovanni Fioriti, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  85. Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J, Picker H, Steinmeyer E, Ruhrmann S (2007) Predicting first-episode psychosis by basic symptom criteria. Clin Neuropsychiatry 4:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  86. Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J, Ruhrmann S (2014) Improving the clinical prediction of psychosis by combining ultra-high risk criteria and cognitive basic symptoms. Schizophr Res 154:100–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Schultze-Lutter F, Michel C, Schmidt SJ et al (2015) EPA guidance on the early detection of clinical high risk states of psychoses. European Psychiatry (in press)

  88. Schultze-Lutter F, Ruhrmann S, Berning J, Maier W, Klosterkötter J (2010) Basic symptoms and ultrahigh risk criteria: symptom development in the initial prodromal state. Schizophr Bull 36:182–191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Schultze-Lutter F, Schimmelmann BG, Ruhrmann S, Michel C (2013) ‘A rose is a rose is a rose’, but at-risk criteria differ. Psychopathology 46:75–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Smieskova R, Fusar-Poli P, Allen P et al (2010) Neuroimaging predictors of transition to psychosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34:1207–1222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Stafford MR, Jackson H, Mayo-Wilson E, Morrison AP, Kendall T (2013) Early interventions to prevent psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 346:f185

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Tarbox SI, Addington J, Cadenhead KS et al (2013) Premorbid functional development and conversion to psychosis in clinical high-risk youths. Dev Psychopathol 25:1171–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Valmaggia LR, Stahl D, Yung AR et al (2013) Negative psychotic symptoms and impaired role functioning predict transition outcomes in the at-risk mental state: a latent class cluster analysis study. Psychol Med 43:2311–2325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. van der Gaag M, Nieman DH, Rietdijk J et al (2012) Cognitive behavioral therapy for subjects at ultrahigh risk for developing psychosis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Schizophr Bull 38:1180–1188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. van der Gaag M, Smit F, Bechdolf A et al (2013) Preventing a first episode of psychosis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled prevention trials of 12 month and longer-term follow-ups. Schizophr Res 149:56–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. van Tricht MJ, Ruhrmann S, Arns M et al (2014) Can quantitative EEG measures predict clinical outcome in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis? A prospective multicenter study. Schizophr Res 153:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Velthorst E, Nieman DH, Linszen D et al (2010) Disability in people clinically at high risk of psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 197:278–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. von Reventlow HG, Kruger-Ozgurdal S, Ruhrmann S et al (2014) Pathways to care in subjects at high risk for psychotic disorders: a European perspective. Schizophr Res 152:400–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. WHO (2004) Prevention of mental disorders: Effective interventions and policy options. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  100. Wu EQ, Birnbaum HG, Shi L et al (2005) The economic burden of schizophrenia in the united states in 2002. Journal Clin Psychiatry 66:1122–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Yung A, Phillips L, Simmons MB et al (2006) CAARMS—comprehensive assessment of at risk mental states. The PACE Clinic. University of Melbourne, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  102. Yung AR, Nelson B, Thompson A, Wood SJ (2010) The psychosis threshold in ultra high risk (prodromal) research: is it valid? Schizophr Res 120:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Zimmermann R, Gschwandtner U, Wilhelm FH et al (2010) EEG spectral power and negative symptoms in at-risk individuals predict transition to psychosis. Schizophr Res 123:208–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

FSL, NK and SJS declare that they have no interest conflicting with the content of this manuscript. JK received investigator-initiated grant support from Bristol-Myers Squibb. SR received travel support and speaker fee from Servier, Roche and Janssen-Cilag.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Ruhrmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruhrmann, S., Schultze-Lutter, F., Schmidt, S.J. et al. Prediction and prevention of psychosis: current progress and future tasks. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 264 (Suppl 1), 9–16 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-014-0541-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-014-0541-5

Keywords

Navigation