Skip to main content
Log in

New classification and surgical strategy for work type I congenital first branchial cleft anomalies in children

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the anatomical relationships between the structures adjacent to the cartilaginous portion of the ear canal in children with Work type I congenital branchial cleft anomalies (CFBCAs) and to develop new classifications and surgical strategies.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on 50 children with Work type I CFBCAs admitted between December 2018 and December 2022.

Results

Among the 50 children, total parotidectomy was performed on 49 sides. In 44 cases (88%), the main body of the lesion was closely associated with the cartilage of the inferior ear canal wall. Among these cases, the lesions in 40 cases occurred within the space enclosed by the dorsal inferior wall cartilage, mastoid process, and parotid gland, while in the remaining four cases, the lesions were located between the anterior inferior wall cartilage and parotid gland. Based on the preoperative imaging observations, clinical manifestations, and intraoperative findings, the cases were classified into 6 subtypes (a to f) including 21 cases (42%) of Type Ia (inferior wall of EAC), 7 cases (14%) of Type Ib (bottom wall of EAC), 12 cases (24%) of Type Ic (posterior–inferior wall of EAC), 4 cases (8%) of Type Id (anterior–inferior wall of EAC), 4 cases (8%) of Type Ie (anterior ear wall of EAC), and 2 cases (4%) of Type If (isolated from parotid).

Conclusion

Surgical intervention is the only treatment for first branchial cleft anomalies and a comprehensive understanding of the classifications will help with the precise localisation and excision of the lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is available in this manuscript.

References

  1. Magdy EA, Ashram YA (2013) First branchial cleft anomalies: presentation, variability and safe surgical management. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:1917–1925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Quintanilla-Dieck L, Virgin F, Wootten C, Goudy S, Penn E Jr (2016) Surgical approaches to first branchial cleft anomaly excision: a case series. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2016:3902974

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Work WP (1972) Newver concepts of first branchial cleft defects. Laryngoscope 125:520–532

    Google Scholar 

  4. Olivas AD, Sherman JM (2017) First branchial cleft anomalies. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 28:151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu W, Chen M, Hao J, Yang Y, Zhang J, Ni X (2017) The treatment for the first branchial cleft anomalies in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:3465–3470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li W, Zhao L, Xu H, Li X (2017) First branchial cleft anomalies in children: experience with 30 cases. Exp Ther Med 14:333–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Del Pero M, Majumdar S, Bateman N (2007) Presentation of first branchial cleft anomalies: the Sheffield experience. J Laryngol Otol 121:455–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Souza AR, Uppal HS, De R (2002) Updating concepts of first branchial cleft defects: a literature review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 62:103–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ertas B, Gunaydin RO, Unal OF (2015) The relationship between the fistula tract and the facial nerve in type II first branchial cleft anomalies. Auris Nasus Larynx 42:119–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan KC, Chao WC, Wu CM (2012) Surgical management of first branchial cleft anomaly presenting as infected retroauricular mass using a microscopic dissection technique. Am J Otolaryngol 33:20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Olsen KD, Maragos NE, Weiland LH (1980) First branchial cleft anomalies. Laryngoscope 90:423–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu W, Chen M, Liu B, Zhang J, Ni X (2021) Clinical analysis of type II first branchial cleft anomalies in children. Laryngoscope 131:916–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bagchi A, Hira P, Mittal K, Priyamvara A, Dey AK (2018) Branchial cleft cysts: a pictorial review. Pol J Radiol 83:e204–e209

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Souza AR, Uppal HS, De R, Zeitoun H (2002) Updating concepts of first branchial cleft defects: a literature review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 62:103–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu W, Liu B, Chen M, Hao J, Yang Y, Zhang J (2018) Clinical analysis of first branchial cleft anomalies in children. Pediatr Investig 2:149–153

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen L, Zhang B, Xu M, Zhou Z, Huang Y, Xu X, Liang L, Gong X, Huang S (2020) Classification and surgical strategy of Work I congenital first branchial cleft anomaly based on adjacent anatomy. J Clin Otothinolaryngol Head Neck Surg (China) 34:695–700

    Google Scholar 

  17. Triglia JM, Nicollas R, Ducroz V, Koltai PJ, Garabedian EN (1998) First branchial cleft anomalies: a study of 39 cases and a review of the literature. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124:291–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maithani T, Pandey A, Dey D (2014) First branchial cleft anomaly: clinical insight into its relevance in otolaryngology with pediatric considerations. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 66:271–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 82071038).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: JB, BY, and YF; administrative support: YF; provision of study materials or patients: BY, BX, and YZ; collection and assembly of data: JB and BY; data analysis and interpretation: JB and BY; manuscript writing: JB; final approval of manuscript: all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Bi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all of the families of individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bi, J., Yu, B., Fu, Y. et al. New classification and surgical strategy for work type I congenital first branchial cleft anomalies in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 5539–5546 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08140-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08140-4

Keywords

Navigation