Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture with the blind technique: 10 years’ experience

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Propose

The aim of the present article is to propose an alternative technique to the traditional secondary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy, describing the procedure step-by-step, analyzing the complications and long-term results.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent secondary TEP with the blind technique using a rigid hysterometer. The main steps in this technique are described and illustrated. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes were assessed.

Results

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this study. In all but one case, risk factors that could hinder rigid esophagoscopy were identified (37.5% neopharyngeal/esophageal post-surgical issues, 81.3% prior radiotherapy, 21.9% cervical arthrosis, and 12.5% prior coloplasty or gastric transposition). No intra- or postoperative surgical complications were noted.

Conclusion

The blind technique offers an alternative method to perform a secondary TEP safely and efficiently in patients with unfavorable anatomical or clinical conditions, lowering the risk of procedure-related complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allegra E, La Mantia I, Bianco MR et al (2019) Verbal performance of total laryngectomized patients rehabilitated with oesophageal speech and tracheoesophageal speech: impacts on patient quality of life. Psychol Res Behav Manage 12:675–681. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s212793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bozec A, Poissonnet G, Chamorey E et al (2009) Results of vocal rehabilitation using tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy and their predictive factors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(5):751–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1138-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Galli A, Giordano L, Biafora M, Tulli M, Di Santo D, Bussi M (2019) Voice prosthesis rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: are satisfaction and quality of life maintained over time? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 39(3):162–168. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100x-2227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Satlürk Z, Arslanoğlu A, Özdemir E et al (2016) How do voice restoration methods affect the psychological status of patients after total laryngectomy? HNO 64(3):163–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-016-0134-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zenga J, Goldsmith T, Bunting G, Deschler DG (2018) State of the art: Rehabilitation of speech and swallowing after total laryngectomy. Oral Oncol 86:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.08.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Singer MI, Hamaker RC, Blom ED, Yoshida GY (1989) Applications of the voice prosthesis during laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 8:921–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blom ED, Hamaker RC (1996) Tracheoesophageal voice restoration following total laryngectomy. In: Myers EN, Suen JY (eds) Cancer of the head and neck, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, pp 839–852

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calkovsky V, Hajtman A (2014) Primary prosthetic voice rehabilitation in patients after laryngectomy: applications and pitfalls. Adv Exp Med Biol 852:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2014_104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Petersen JF, Lansaat L, Timmermans AJ, van der Noort V, Hilgers FJM, van den Brekel MWM (2019) Postlaryngectomy prosthetic voice rehabilitation outcomes in a consecutive cohort of 232 patients over a 13-year period. Head Neck 41(3):623–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25364

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chakravarty PD, McMurran AEL, Banigo A, Shakeel M, Ah-See KW (2017) Primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol 132(01):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215117002390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Deschler DG, Emerick KS, Lin DT, Bunting GW (2011) Simplified technique of tracheoesophageal prosthesis placement at the time of secondary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP). Laryngoscope 121(9):1855–1859. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Emerick KS, Tomycz L, Bradford CR et al (2009) Primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in salvage total laryngectomy following chemoradiation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140(3):386–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pighi GP, Barbieri F, Adami R, Fiorino F (2009) Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture: blind technique with a rigid hysterometer. Laryngoscope 119(7):1431–1434. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorenz KJ, Maier H (2010) Secondary tracheo-oesophageal fistula creation without rigid oesophagoscopy: how we do it. Clin Otolaryngol 35(1):61–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.02032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenz KJ (2014) The development and treatment of periprosthetic leakage after prosthetic voice restoration. A literature review and personal experience part I: the development of periprosthetic leakage. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(3):641–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3394-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Padhya TA, Athavale SM, Morgan JM, McCaffrey TV (2008) An alternative approach for secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in the difficult laryngectomy neck. Laryngoscope 118(2):266–269. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlg.0b013e318158e437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tkaczuk AT, Taylor RJ, Wolf JS (2018) A novel device for placement of a secondary tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: a preliminary feasibility study. ORL 80(1):36–40. https://doi.org/10.1159/000485513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Secall MT, Bores T, Sambola I, Lop J, Rica EG, Lluansi J (2017) Minimally invasive wire-guided balloon catheter puncture for voice prosthesis insertion. Head Neck 00:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luu K, Chang BA, Valenzuela D, Anderson D (2018) Primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture for voice rehabilitation in laryngectomy patients: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 43(5):1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bacon CK, Hendrix RA (1992) Open tube versus flexible esophagoscopy in adult head and neck endoscopy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 101(2):147–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949210100208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Crawley B, Dehom S, Tamares S et al (2019) Adverse events after rigid and flexible endoscopic repair of Zenker’s diverticula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599819839991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsu DY, Gabel E (2018) Rigid esophagoscopy-induced aortic rupture during oral gastric tube placement in patient with esophageal stricture. A A Pract 11(1):14–15. https://doi.org/10.1213/xaa.0000000000000721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kavic SM, Basson MD (2001) Complications of endoscopy. Am J Surg 181(4):319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00589-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Laura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The present authors have no financial relationships to disclose.

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gazzini, L., Laura, E., Molteni, G. et al. Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture with the blind technique: 10 years’ experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 4459–4467 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06674-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06674-z

Keywords

Navigation