Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Decompression endoscopic surgery for frontal secondary headache attributed to supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve entrapment: a comprehensive review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last decade, a new surgical treatment modality was developed for frontal secondary headache, based on the assumption that the trigger of this pain entity is the entrapment of peripheral sensory nerves. The surgery entails a procedure, where an endoscopic approach is used to decompress the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve branches, which are entrapped by the periosteum in the region of the corrugator supercilii muscle. Candidates for the surgery define their headache as moderate to severe persistent daily pressure or tension, localized in the frontal area, sometimes accompanied by symptoms of nausea and photophobia mimicking a primary headache—migraine. We created a step-by-step screening algorithm which is used to differentiate patients that have the highest chance for a successful surgical decompression. Up to now, published data regarding this type of surgery demonstrate long-lasting successful outcomes while adverse effects are minor. This article reviews and discusses from a surgeon’s perspective decompression surgery for secondary headache attributed to supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve entrapment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (2012) Headache disorders. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs277/en/. Accessed 11 Sept 2016

  2. Guyuron B, Varghai A, Michelow BJ, Thomas T, Davis J (2000) Corrugator supercilii muscle resection and migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:429–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Janis JE, Ghavami A, Lemmon JA, Leedy JE, Guyuron B (2007) Anatomy of the corrugator supercilii muscle: part I. Corrugator topography. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1647–1653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Janis JE, Ghavami A, Lemmon JA, Leedy JE, Guyuron B (2008) The anatomy of the corrugator supercilii muscle: part II. Supraorbital nerve branching patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:233–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Janis JE, Hatef DA, Hagan R, Schaub T, Liu JH, Thakar H, Bolden KM, Heller JB, Kurkjian TJ (2013) Anatomy of the supratrochlear nerve: implications for the surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:743–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Challa SR (2015) Surgical animal models of neuropathic pain: pros and cons. Int J Neurosci 125:170–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jansen J, Bardosi A, Hildebrandt J, Lücke A (1989) Cervicogenic, hemicranial attacks associated with vascular irritation or compression of the cervical nerve root C2. Clinical manifestations and morphological findings. Pain 39:203–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathew PG (2014) A critical evaluation of migraine trigger site deactivation surgery. Headache 54:142–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dirnberger F, Becker K (2004) Surgical treatment of migraine headaches by corrugator muscle resection. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:652–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bearden WH, Anderson RL (2005) Corrugator superciliaris muscle excision for tension and migraine headaches. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 21:418–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Ru JA, Schellekens PP, Lohuis PJ (2011) Corrugator supercilii transection for headache emanating from the frontal region: a clinical evaluation of ten patients. J Neural Transm 118:1571–1574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gfrerer L, Maman DY, Tessler O, Austen WG Jr (2014) Nonendoscopic deactivation of nerve triggers in migraine headache patients: surgical technique and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:771–778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Edoardo R, Giorgia C (2015) Frontal endoscopic myotomies for chronic headache. J Craniofac Surg 26:201–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurlander DE, Punjabi A, Liu MT, Sattar A, Guyuron B (2014) In-depth review of symptoms, triggers, and treatment of temporal migraine headaches (site II). Plast Reconstr Surg 133:897–903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Janis JE, Hatef DA, Reece EM, McCluskey PD, Schaub TA, Guyuron B (2010) Neurovascular compression of the greater occipital nerve: implications for migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1996–2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2013) The international classification of headache disorders 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 33:629–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Filipović B, Matak I, Lacković Z (2014) Dural neurogenic inflammation induced by neuropathic pain is specific to cranial region. J Neural Transm 121:555–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dodick D, Lipton RB, Martin V et al (2004) Triptan cardiovascular safety expert panel. Consensus statement: cardiovascular safety profile of triptans (5-HT agonists) in the acute treatment of migraine. Headache 44:414–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schachtel BP, Furey SA, Thoden WR (1996) Nonprescription ibuprofen and acetaminophen in the treatment of tension-type headache. J Clin Pharmacol 36:1120–1125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA (2014) Sumatriptan (all routes of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults—overview of cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD009108

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee M, Monson MA, Liu MT, Reed D, Guyuron B (2013) Positive botulinum toxin type a response is a prognosticator for migraine surgery success. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:751–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kung TA, Guyuron B, Cederna PS (2011) Migraine surgery: a plastic surgery solution for refractory migraine headache. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:181–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu MT, Armijo BS, Guyuron B (2012) A comparison of outcome of surgical treatment of migraine headaches using a constellation of symptoms versus botulinum toxin type A to identify the trigger sites. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:413–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Ru JA, Buwalda J (2008) Botulinum toxin A injection into corrugator muscle for frontally localised chronic daily headache or chronic tension-type headache. J Laryngol Otol 123:412–417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fozzard HA, Lee PJ, Lipkind GM (2005) Mechanism of local anesthetic drug action on voltage-gated sodium channels. Curr Pharm Des 11:2671–2686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Blasi J, Chapman ER, Link E et al (1993) Botulinum neurotoxin A selectively cleaves the synaptic protein SNAP-25. Nature 365:160–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Silberstein SD (2016) The use of botulinum toxin in the management of headache disorders. Semin Neurol 36:92–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fallucco M, Janis JE, Hagan RR (2012) The anatomical morphology of the supraorbital notch: clinical relevance to the surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:1227–1233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu MT, Chim H, Guyuron B (2012) Outcome comparison of endoscopic and transpalpebral decompression for treatment of frontal migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:1113–1119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Janis JE, Barker JC, Javadi C, Ducic I, Hagan R, Guyuron B (2014) A review of current evidence in the surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chepla KJ, Oh E, Guyuron B (2012) Clinical outcomes following supraorbital foraminotomy for treatment of frontal migraine headache. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:656–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Larson K, Lee M, Davis J, Guyuron B (2011) Factors contributing to migraine headache surgery failure and success. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:1069–1075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rawlins M (2008) De testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions. Lancet 372:2152–2161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ernst E, Resch KL (1995) Concept of true and perceived placebo effects. BMJ 311:551–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Moerman DE, Jonas WB (2002) Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response. Ann Intern Med 136:471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Juni P, Altman DG et al (2008) Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 336:601–605

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wartolowska K, Judge A, Hopewell S, Collins GS, Dean BJ, Rombach I, Brindley D, Savulescu J, Beard DJ, Carr AJ (2014) Use of placebo controls in the evaluation of surgery: systematic review. BMJ 348:3253. doi:10.1136/bmj.g3253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kaptchuk TJ, Goldman P, Stone DA, Stason WB (2000) Do medical devices have enhanced placebo effects? J Clin Epidemiol 53:786–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Freeman TB, Vawter DE, Leaverton PE, Godbold JH, Hauser RA, Goetz CG, Olanow CW (1999) Use of placebo surgery in controlled trials of a cellular-based therapy for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 341:988–992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gelijns AC, Ascheim DD, Parides MK, Kent KC, Moskowitz AJ (2009) Randomized trials in surgery. Surgery 145:581–587

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Macklin R (1999) The ethical problems with sham surgery in clinical research. N Engl J Med 341:992–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Guyuron B, Reed D, Kriegler JS, Davis J, Pashmini N, Amini S (2009) A placebo-controlled surgical trial of the treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:461–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Matak I, Lacković Z (2014) Botulinum toxin A, brain and pain. Prog Neurobiol 119–120:39–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Filipović B, Matak I, Bach-Rojecky L, Lacković Z (2012) Central action of peripherally applied botulinum toxin type A on pain and dural protein extravasation in rat model of trigeminal neuropathy. PLoS One 7(1):e29803. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029803

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Bloudek LM, Stokes M, Buse DC et al (2012) Cost of healthcare for patients with migraine in five European countries: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). J Headache Pain 13:361–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Mr. Nikola Šudelija and Mr. Ivan Filipović for graphic design and illustration contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Filipović.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This is a non-funded study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

405_2017_4450_MOESM1_ESM.wmv

Online Resource 1. Decompression surgery for frontal secondary headache; endoscopic approach. Video shows endoscopic elevation of the forehead skin–muscle–periosteum flap in a subperiosteal plane. Incision of the periosteum is made at the supraorbital rims, followed by blunt dissection of the glabellar muscles, until both supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve with accompanying vessels are well visualized. (WMV 11865 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filipović, B., de Ru, J.A., van de Langenberg, R. et al. Decompression endoscopic surgery for frontal secondary headache attributed to supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve entrapment: a comprehensive review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 2093–2106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4450-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4450-x

Keywords

Navigation