Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The new WHO classification of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer and its clinical implications

  • News and Views
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 13 April 2016

Abstract

Introduction

Molecular pathological research has contributed to improving the knowledge of different subtypes of ovarian cancer. In parallel with the implementation of the new FIGO staging classification, the WHO classification was revised. The latter is mainly based on the histopathological findings and defines the actual type of tumor. It has, therefore, also an important impact on prognosis and therapy of the patient.

Materials and methods

The new WHO Classification of Ovarian Cancer published 2014 by Robert Kurman and co-authors is summarized. The major changes compared to the hitherto existing classification are presented.

Results

The new classification eliminates the previous focus of mesothelial origin of ovarian cancer. Instead, it features a discussion of tubal carcinogenesis of hereditary and some other high-grade serous carcinomas. The previously assumed pathogenesis pathway may be correct for some, but not for all, serous cancers. The new classification was established to classify ovarian cancer in a more consistent way. The earlier transitional cell type of ovarian cancer has been removed while seromucinous tumors have been added as a new entity. The role of some borderline tumors as one possible step in the progression from benign to invasive lesions is incorporated. The article summarizes the essential updates concerning serous, mucinous, seromucinous, endometrioid, clear-cell, and Brenner tumors.

Conclusion

The new WHO classification takes into account the recent findings on the origin, pathogenesis, and prognosis of different ovarian cancer subtypes. The tubal origin of hereditary and some non-hereditary high-grade serous cancers is mentioned in contrast to the hitherto theory of mesothelial origin of tumors. Seromucinous tumors represent a new entity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meinhold-Heerlein I, Hauptmann S (2014) The heterogeneity of ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:237–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Prat J, Oncology FCoG (2014) Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Int Feder Gynaecol Obstet 124:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeppernick F, Meinhold-Heerlein I (2014) The new FIGO staging system for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290:839–842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meinhold-Heerlein I, Fotopoulou C, Harter P et al (2015) Statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO: the new FIGO and WHO classifications of ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 75:1021–1027

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS et al (2014) WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. In WHO Classification of Tumours. 4. Aufl. Lyon: WHO Press

  6. Pecorelli S, Benedet JL, Creasman WT et al (1999) FIGO staging of gynecologic cancer. 1994–1997 FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 65:243–249

  7. Pecorelli S, Benedet JL, Creasman WT et al (1999) FIGO staging of gynecologic cancer. 1994–1997 FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 64:5–10

  8. Shepherd JH (1989) Revised FIGO staging for gynaecological cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 96:889–892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ledermann JA, Raja FA, Fotopoulou C et al (2013) Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO 24 Suppl 6:vi24–32

  10. Wagner U, Harter P, Hilpert F et al (2013) S3-guideline on diagnostics, therapy and follow-up of malignant ovarian tumours: short version 1.0—AWMF registration number: 032/035OL, June 2013. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 73:874–889

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cancer NCCf (2011) Ovarian cancer: the recognition and initial management of ovarian cancer. In: http://www.nice.org.uk: National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, Cardiff, Wales

  12. Shih Ie M, Kurman RJ (2004) Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis. The American journal of pathology 164:1511–1518

  13. Przybycin CG, Kurman RJ, Ronnett BM et al (2010) Are all pelvic (nonuterine) serous carcinomas of tubal origin? Am J Surg Pathol 34:1407–1416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurman RJ, Shih Ie M (2011) Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer—shifting the paradigm. Hum Pathol 42:918–931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Meinhold-Heerlein I, Bauerschlag D, Hilpert F et al (2005) Molecular and prognostic distinction between serous ovarian carcinomas of varying grade and malignant potential. Oncogene 24:1053–1065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hauptmann S, du Bois A, Meinhold-Herlein I et al (2014) Histological grading of epithelial ovarian cancer. Review and recommendation. Der Pathologe 35:497–503

  17. Prat J (2012) New insights into ovarian cancer pathology. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 23(Suppl 10):x111–x117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hauptmann S (2015) Die neue WHO-Klassifikation des Ovarial-. Tuben- und primären Peritonealkarzinoms

  19. Chene G, Ouellet V, Rahimi K et al (2015) The ARID1A pathway in ovarian clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma, contiguous endometriosis, and benign endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Feder Gynaecol Obstet 130:27–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiegand KC, Shah SP, Al-Agha OM et al (2010) ARID1A mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas. New Engl J Med 363:1532–1543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. du Bois A, Ewald-Riegler N, de Gregorio N et al (2013) Borderline tumours of the ovary: a cohort study of the Arbeitsgmeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group. Eur J Cancer 49:1905–1914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

On behalf of the Kommission Ovar of AGO.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meinhold-Heerlein, I., Fotopoulou, C., Harter, P. et al. The new WHO classification of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer and its clinical implications. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293, 695–700 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4035-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4035-8

Keywords

Navigation