Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Usefulness of fetal monitoring in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a prospective study

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To study the role of fetal surveillance in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Materials and methods

A total of 69 women with obstetric cholestasis were included. Fetal surveillance began at 34 weeks or later at diagnosis and included daily maternal record of fetal movements, biophysical profile (i.e., non-stress test, amniotic fluid volume assessment using the four quadrant amniotic fluid index), and Doppler flow velocimetry. Fetal monitoring was done weekly before 36 weeks and biweekly after that.

Results

There were no abnormal non-stress test readings and all pregnancies had good biophysical profile. One hundred and sixty Doppler measurements [Systolic–Diastolic (S/D ratio) and Pourcelot index (PR)] were taken from 67 patients at scheduled intervals during the study period. Findings were compared to gestation matched reference values of Doppler flow velocities of umbilical artery of normal pregnant population. Fifty-six out of 160 PR indices and 33 out of 162 S/D ratio readings were above 2 SD and these results were found to be statistically significant. However, there was no significant correlation with the serum levels of alanine transaminase (r = −0.071) or with aspartate transaminase (r = 0.058). Further, there was no correlation of Doppler with rates of preterm delivery or meconium-stained liquor.

Conclusion

Doppler investigation of the umbilical artery might be of some value in recognition of the specific risk of fetal compromise in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lammert F, Marschall HU, Glantz A, Matern S (2000) Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. J Hepatol 33:1012–1021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alsulyman OM, Ouzounian JG, Ames-Castro M, Goodwin TM (1996) Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: perinatal outcome associated with expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:957–960

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Martinez E, Rodriguez N, Lisoni M, Cruzat L, Glasinovic J, Marinovic I (1987) Usefulness of biophysical profile in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 52:137–141

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bacq Y, Sapey T, Brechot MC, Pierre F, Fignon A, Dubios F (1997) Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a French prospective study. Hepatology 26:358–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heikkinen J, Maentausta O, Ylostalo P, Janne O (1981) Changes in serum bileacid concentrations during normal pregnancy, in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and in pregnant women with itching. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 88:240–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zimmermann P, Koskinen J, Vaalamo P, Ranata T (1991) Doppler umbilical artery velocimetry in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis. J Perinat Med 19:351–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Acharya G, Wilsgaard T, Bernsten GKR et al (2005) Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Merz E (ed) (2005) Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology, vol I. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shaw D, Frohlich J, Wittmann BA, Willms M (1982) A prospective study of 18 patients with cholestasis of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:621–625

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rioseco AJ, Ivankovic MB, Manjur A, Hamed F, Kato SR, Parer JT et al (1994) Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a retrospective case control study of perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:890–895

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Glantz A, Marshall HU, Mattsson LA (2004) Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: relationships between bile acid levels and fetal complication rates. Hepatology 40:467–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roncaglia N, Arreghini A, Locatelli A, Bellini P, Andreotti C, Ghidini A (2002) Obstetric cholestasis: outcome with active management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 100:167–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guerra F, Guzman S, Campos G (1994) Evaluation of maternal and fetal blood flow indices in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 59:17–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest in relation to the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reenu Jain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suri, V., Jain, R., Aggarwal, N. et al. Usefulness of fetal monitoring in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a prospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286, 1419–1424 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2482-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2482-4

Keywords

Navigation