Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of usage practices, ethnicity and climate on the skin compatibility of sanitary pads

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern disposable sanitary pads are becoming available worldwide. Regional differences in usage practices, ethnicity, and climate may influence their skin compatibility. Pad usage practices depend on culture, economics, and menstrual physiology. Daily usage is higher in Japan and but lower in Nigeria compared to North America or Western Europe. Evidence for ethnic differences in skin irritant susceptibility is not compelling. Dark skin may be less susceptible to certain irritants than fair skin; the Japanese may experience a higher degree of sensory irritation than Caucasians. Ambient conditions such as high temperature and humidity increase the skin temperature and skin surface moisture under sanitary pads by small but measurable amounts, causing no discernible skin irritation; vapor-permeable pad backings reduce these effects. Cold dry conditions, which can irritate exposed skin, may not affect vulvar skin to the same degree due to its elevated hydration and occlusion. To address the practical significance of these variables, results of prospective clinical trials of sanitary pads performed by industry and academic scientists in North America (Indiana), Mexico, Western Europe (Munich, Athens, Goteborg, Sweden), Eastern Europe (Kiev) and Africa (Abuja, Nigeria) were reviewed. Despite the diverse range of conditions, no significant adverse skin effects were observed with modern pads compared to traditional pad designs. Study participants generally preferred modern pads for performance and comfort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adams Hillard PJ (2002) Menstruation in young girls: a clinical perspective. Obstet Gynecol 99:655–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aramaki J, Kawana S, Effendy I, Happle R, Loffler H (2002) Differences of skin irritation between Japanese and European women. Br J Dermatol 146:1052–1056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arey LB (1939) The degree of normal menstrual irregularity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 37:12–29

    Google Scholar 

  4. Astner S, Burnett N, Rius-Diaz F, Doukas AG, Gonzalez S, Gonzalez E (2006) Irritant contact dermatitis induced by a common household irritant: a non-invasive evaluation of ethnic variability in skin response. J Am Acad Dermatol 54:458–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Basketter DA, Griffiths HA, Wang XM, Wilhelm KP, McFadden J (1996) Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: the implications for a predictive human patch test. Contact Dermatitis 35:208–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Belsey EM, Pinol AP (1997) Menstrual bleeding patterns in untreated women. Task force on long-acting systemic agents for fertility regulation. Contraception 55:57–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1988a) Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis 18:65–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1988b) Contact dermatitis in blacks. Dermatol Clin 6:363–368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berardesca E, Maibach H (2003) Ethnic skin: overview of structure and function. J Am Acad Dermatol 48:S139–S142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Booth G, Strang JM (1936) Changes in temperature of the skin following ingestion of food. Arch Intern Med 57

  11. Britz MB, Maibach HI (1979) Human labia majora skin: transepidermal water loss in vivo. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 59:23–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Britz MB, Maibach HI, Anjo DM (1980) Human percutaneous penetration of hydrocortisone: the vulva. Arch Dermatol Res 267:313–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Buckley CE III, Lee KL, Burdick DS (1982) Methacholine-induced cutaneous flare response: bivariate analysis of responsiveness and sensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 69:25–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Callender VD (2004) Acne in ethnic skin: special considerations for therapy. Dermatol Ther 17:184–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Corcuff P, Lotte C, Rougier A, Maibach HI (1991) Racial differences in corneocytes. A comparison between black, white and oriental skin. Acta Derm Venereol 71:146–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Elias PM, Cooper ER, Korc A, Brown BE (1981) Percutaneous transport in relation to stratum corneum structure and lipid composition. J Invest Dermatol 76:297–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elsner P, Maibach HI (1990) The effect of prolonged drying on transepidermal water loss, capacitance and pH of human vulvar and forearm skin. Acta Derm Venereol 70:105–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Elsner P, Wilhelm D, Maibach HI (1990) Physiological skin surface water loss dynamics of human vulvar and forearm skin. Acta Derm Venereol 70:141–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Farage MA (2006) The behind-the-knee test: an efficient model for evaluating mechanical and chemical irritation. Skin Res Technol 12:73–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Farage MA, Stadler A (2005) Cumulative irritation patch test of sanitary pads on sensitive skin. J Cosmet Dermatol 4:179–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farage MA, Bjerke DL, Mahony C, Blackburn KL, Gerberick GF (2003a) Quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis: uncertainty factors for mucosal exposures. Contact Dermatitis 49:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Farage MA, Bjerke DL, Mahony C, Blackburn KL, Gerberick GF (2003b) A modified human repeat insult patch test for extended mucosal tissue exposure. Contact Dermatitis 49:214–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Farage MA, Stadler A, Elsner P, Maibach HI (2004) Safety evaluation of modern feminine hygiene pads: two decades of use. Female Patient 29:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  24. Farage MA, Stadler A, Elsner P, Creatsas G, Maibach H (2005a) New surface covering for feminine hygiene pads: dermatological testing. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 24:137–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Farage MA, Katsarou A, Tsagroni E, Bowtell P, Meyer S, Deliveliotou A, Creatsas G (2005b) Cutaneous and sensory effects of two sanitary pads with distinct surface materials: a randomized prospective trial. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 24:227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Farage MA, Katsarou A, Maibach HI (2006) Sensory, clinical and physiological factors in sensitive skin: a review. Contact Dermatitis 55:1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Felter SP, Robinson MK, Basketter DA, Gerberick GF (2002) A review of the scientific basis for uncertainty factors for use in quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 47:257–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Foy V, Weinkauf R, Whittle E, Basketter DA (2001) Ethnic variation in the skin irritation response. Contact Dermatitis 45:346–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gean CJ, Tur E, Maibach HI, Guy RH (1989) Cutaneous responses to topical methyl nicotinate in black, oriental, and caucasian subjects. Arch Dermatol Res 281:95–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Grimes P, Edison BL, Green BA, Wildnauer RH (2004) Evaluation of inherent differences between African-American and white skin surface properties using subjective and objective measures. Cutis 73:392–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Guy RH, Tur E, Bjerke S, Maibach HI (1985) Are there age and racial differences to methyl nicotinate-induced vasodilatation in human skin? J Am Acad Dermatol 12:1001–1006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hanke-Baier P, Johannigmann J, Levin RJ, Wagner G (1994) Evaluation of vaginal and perineal area during the use of external sanitary protection throughout the menstrual cycle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73:486–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hardy JD, DuBois EF (1938) Basal metabolism, radiation, convection and vaporization at temperatures of 22–35°C. J Nutr 15:477–497

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hardy JD, DuBois EF (1940) Differences between men and women in their response to heat and cold. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 256:389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hicks SP, Swindells KJ, Middelkamp-Hup MA, Sifakis MA, Gonzalez E, Gonzalez S (2003) Confocal histopathology of irritant contact dermatitis in vivo and the impact of skin color (black vs white). J Am Acad Dermatol 48:727–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hopper LD, Oehme FW (1989) Chemical risk assessment: a review. Vet Hum Toxicol 31:543–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jimbow K, Fitzpatrick TB, Wick MW (1991) Biochemistry and physiology of melanin pigmentation. In: Goldsmith LA (ed) Physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology of the skin, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, p 895

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jourdain R, Lacharriere O, Bastien P, Maibach HI (2002) Ethnic variations in self-perceived sensitive skin: epidemiological survey. Contact Dermatitis 46:162–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kompaore F, Tsuruta H (1993) In vivo differences between Asian, black and white in the stratum corneum barrier function. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65:S223–S225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kompaore F, Marty JP, Dupont C (1993) In vivo evaluation of the stratum corneum barrier function in blacks, Caucasians and Asians with two non-invasive methods. Skin Pharmacol 6:200–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Launay JC, Besnard Y, Sendowski I, Guinet A, Hanniquet AM, Savourey G (2002) Anthropological and thermoregulatory changes induced by a survival sojourn in a tropical climate. Wilderness Environ Med 13:5–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Law S, Wertz PW, Swartzendruber DC, Squier CA (1995) Regional variation in content, composition and organization of porcine epithelial barrier lipids revealed by thin-layer chromatography and transmission electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol 40:1085–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Modjtahedi SP, Maibach HI (2002) Ethnicity as a possible endogenous factor in irritant contact dermatitis: comparing the irritant response among Caucasians, blacks, and Asians. Contact Dermatitis 47:272–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Oriba HA, Bucks DA, Maibach HI (1996) Percutaneous absorption of hydrocortisone and testosterone on the vulva and forearm: effect of the menopause and site. Br J Dermatol 134:229–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Phillips L II, Steinberg M, Maibach HI, Akers WA (1972) A comparison of rabbit and human skin response to certain irritants. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 21:369–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Rapaport MJ (1984) Patch testing in Japanese subjects. Contact Dermatitis 11:93–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Reed JT, Ghadially R, Elias PM (1995) Skin type, but neither race nor gender, influence epidermal permeability barrier function. Arch Dermatol 131:1134–1138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Reinertson RP, Wheatley VR (1959) Studies on the chemical composition of human epidermal lipids. J Invest Dermatol 32:49–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Richards GM, Oresajo CO, Halder RM (2003) Structure and function of ethnic skin and hair. Dermatol Clin 21:595–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Robinson MK (2000) Racial differences in acute and cumulative skin irritation responses between Caucasian and Asian populations. Contact Dermatitis 42:134–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Robinson MK (2001) Intra-individual variations in acute and cumulative skin irritation responses. Contact Dermatitis 45:75–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Runeman B, Rybo G, Larko O, Faergemann J (2003) The vulva skin microclimate: influence of panty liners on temperature, humidity and pH. Acta Derm Venereol 83:88–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Runeman B, Rybo G, Forsgren-Brusk U, Larko O, Larsson P, Faergemann J (2004) The vulvar skin microenvironment: influence of different panty liners on temperature, pH and microflora. Acta Derm Venereol 84:277–284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Schafer P, Bewick-Sonntag C, Capri MG, Berardesca E (2002) Physiological changes in skin barrier function in relation to occlusion level, exposure time and climatic conditions. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 15:7–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Stadler M, Tischler H, Wambebe C, Osisanya T, Farage MA (2006) An investigator-blind, single-center, controlled, parallel group study to confirm the suitability of sanitary pads for menstrual protection in an ethnic Nigerian population. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 26(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sugino K, Imokawa G, Maibach HI (1993) Ethnic difference of stratum corneum lipid in relation to stratum corneum function. J Invest Dermatol 100:597

    Google Scholar 

  57. Treloar AE, Boynton RE, Behn BG, Brown BW (1967) Variation of the human menstrual cycle through reproductive life. Int J Fertil 12:77–126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Weigand DA, Merchon MM (1970) The cutaneous irritant reaction to agent o-chlorobenzylidene (cs). Eddewood Arsenal Techincal Report, MD, EB-TR-4332

  59. Weigand DA, Gaylor JR (1974) Irritant reaction in Negro and Caucasian skin. South Med J 67:548–551

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Weigand DA, Haygood C, Gaylor JR (1974) Cell layers and density of Negro and Caucasian stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 62:563–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Weydahl A, Halberg F (1987) Daily spot-checking versus chronobiologic monitoring of human differential surface (rib vs breast) temperature. Prog Clin Biol Res 227A:483–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. World health organization multicenter study on menstrual and ovulatory patterns in adolescent girls (1986) II. Longitudinal study of menstrual patterns in the early post-menarcheal period, duration of bleeding episodes and menstrual cycles. World health organization task force on adolescent reproductive health. J Adolesc Health Care 7:236–244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Kenneth Miller and Bruce E. Jones for their technical review and Dr. Deborah Hutchins, of Hutchins & Associates, LLC, Cincinnati, OH, for technical input and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miranda Farage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farage, M., Elsner, P. & Maibach, H. Influence of usage practices, ethnicity and climate on the skin compatibility of sanitary pads. Arch Gynecol Obstet 275, 415–427 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0273-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0273-5

Keywords

Navigation