Abstract
Purpose
Following breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy followed by autologous breast reconstruction, breast cancer patients were studied to discover their satisfaction with the aesthetic results of the two treatment strategies.
Patients and methods
One hundred and thirty-four breast cancer patients were included in this study. Sixty-four underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy. Mastectomy was performed in 70 patients with immediate or late reconstruction. To evaluate the quality of the aesthetic results in both groups we designed a questionnaire assessing different cosmetic categories.
Results
Patients in both therapy groups showed a very high satisfaction with their cosmetic results; the patients undergoing breast reconstruction were even more satisfied than the patients who had breast-conserving therapy.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrated that breast reconstruction with autologous tissue offers an opportunity to support patients with advanced breast cancer who were confronted with mastectomy, showing a high degree of satisfaction with the cosmetic results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkins H, Hayward J, Klugman D, Wayte A (1972) Treatment of early breast cancer—a report after ten years of a clinical trial. Br Med J 2:423–429
Bostwick J, Nahai F, Wallace J, Vasconez L (1979) Sixty latissimus dorsi flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:31–37
Carlson GW, Bostwick J, Styblo TM (1997) Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg 225:570–575
Carlson GW, Losken A, Moore B (2001) Results of immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 46:222–228
Carlson GW, Styblo TM, Lyles RH (2003) Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism? Ann Surg Oncol 10(2):108–112
Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A, Nos C, Mosseri V (1998) Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg 41(5):471–481
Cocquyt VF, Blondeel PN, Depypere HT (2003) Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plast Surg 56(5):462–470
Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Sauer H, Holzel D (2004) Quality of life following breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: results of a 5 year prospective study. Breast J 10(3):223–231
Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T (1999) Breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap: improved aesthetic results after transection of its humeral insertion. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1876–1881
Gerber B, Krause A, Kuchenmeister I, et al (2000) Skin sparing mastectomy with autologous immediate reconstruction: oncological risks and aesthetic results. Zentralbl Gynakol 122(9):476–482
Giacalone PL, Bricout N, Dantas MJ, Daures J, Laffargue F (2002) Achieving symmetry in unilateral breast reconstruction: 17 years experience with 683 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26(4):299–302
Gui GP, Behranwala KA, Abdullah N (2004) The inframammary fold: contents, clinical significance and implications for immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 57(2):146–149
Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK (1987) Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient. A critical review of 300 patients. Ann Surg 205(5):508–519
Hudson DA (2004) Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 52(1):15–21
Hultman CS, Daiza S (2003) Skin-sparing mastectomy flap complications after breast reconstruction: review of incidence, management, and outcome. Ann Plast Surg 50(3):249–255, discussion 255
Kroll SS, Coffey JA, Winn RJ (1995) A comparison of factors affecting aesthetic outcomes of TRAM-flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(4):860–864
Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE (1999) Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6 year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(2):421–425
Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ (2002) Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg 235:814–819
Olivari N (1976) The latissimus flap. Br J Plast Surg 29:126–128
Singletary SE, Kroll SS (1996) Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Adv Surg 30:39–52
Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB (1998) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:49–62
Sotheran WJ, Rainsbury RM (2004) Skin-sparing mastectomy in the UK—a review of current practice. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 80(2):82–86
Torre JI de la, Fix RJ, Gardner PM (2001) Reconstruction with the latissimus dorsi flap after skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 46(3):229–233
Veiga DF, Neto MS, Garcia EB, Filho JV (2002) Evaluation of the aesthetic results and patients satisfaction with the late pedicled tram flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 48(5):515–520
Woerdeman LA, Hage JJ, Thio EA (2004) Breast-conserving therapy in patients with a relatively large (T2 or T3) breast cancer: a long-term local control and cosmetic outcome of a feasibility study. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(6):1607–1616
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors declare that there are no considerations or conflicts of interest. Patients gave informed consent for this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dian, D., Schwenn, K., Mylonas, I. et al. Aesthetic result among breast cancer patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction versus breast conserving therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 275, 445–450 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0270-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0270-8