Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of retropatellar cartilage defects: clinical results referred to defect localisation

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Although autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has become well established for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee joint, nevertheless clinical results of retropatellar lesions are still inferior compared to those of defects located on femoral condyles. We report the clinical results obtained in 70 patients treated with ACI for full-thickness defects of the patella, with special reference to defect location and size, age, body mass index and sports activity.

Methods

At a follow-up of 38.4 months (range 14–64, follow-up rate 83.3%), patients’ subjective functional knee scores (IKDC, Lysholm) were analysed, as were the results of objective examination (according to ICRS).

Results

Mean patient age at the time of surgery was 34.3 years (±10.1). The mean Lysholm score at the time of follow-up was 73.0 (±22.4) and the subjective IKDC score was 61.6 (±21.5); normal and nearly normal clinical results according to the objective criteria of the International Cartilage Research Society (ICRS) were achieved in 67.1% of the patients, while abnormal results were achieved in 20.0% of the patients and severely abnormal results, in 12.9%. While different surgical techniques did not seem to have any significant influence on the treatment results, both defect size and defect location within the patella were found to be significantly associated with clinical outcome. The corollaries to this are that larger cartilage lesions of the patella are associated with an inferior outcome (p = 0.007) and that cartilage defects located on the lateral patellar facet are correlated with a better clinical outcome than those located on the medial facet or those involving both facets (p = 0.017).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that within a group of patients treated with ACI for retropatellar cartilage lesion there are significant differences in clinical outcome, which are important and should be taken into account of when a decision has to be made on whether or not ACI is indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfredson H, Lorentzon R (1999) Superior results with continuous passive motion compared to active motion after periosteal transplantation. A retrospective study of human patella cartilage defect treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:232–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bentley G, Biant LC, Carrington RW, Akmal M, Goldberg A, Williams AM, Skinner JA, Pringle J (2003) A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:223–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brittberg M (2000) ICRS clinical cartilage injury evaluation system. 3rd ICRS Meeting Göteborg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brittberg M, Peterson L, Sjogren-Jansson E, Tallheden T, Lindahl A (2003) Articular cartilage engineering with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. A review of recent developments. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (Suppl 3):109–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brittberg M, Tallheden T, Sjogren-Jansson B, Lindahl A, Peterson L (2001) Autologous chondrocytes used for articular cartilage repair: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:S337–S348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (Suppl 2):58–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Erggelet C, Sittinger M, Lahm A (2003) The arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee joint. Arthroscopy 19:108–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Erggelet C, Steinwachs MR, Reichelt A (2000) The operative treatment of full thickness cartilage defects in the knee joint with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Saudi Med J 21:715–721

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitzgerald JB, Jin M, Grodzinsky AJ (2006) Shear and compression differentially regulate clusters of functionally related temporal transcription patterns in cartilage tissue. J Biol Chem 281:24095–24103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gobbi A, Kon E, Berruto M, Francisco R, Filardo G, Marcacci M (2006) Patellofemoral full-thickness chondral defects treated with Hyalograft-C: a clinical, arthroscopic, and histologic review. Am J Sports Med 34:1763–1773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gobbi A, Nunag P, Malinowski K (2005) Treatment of full thickness chondral lesions of the knee with microfracture in a group of athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:213–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grodzinsky AJ, Levenston ME, Jin M, Frank EH (2000) Cartilage tissue remodeling in response to mechanical forces. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2:691–713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Haddo O, Mahroof S, Higgs D, David L, Pringle J, Bayliss M, Cannon SR, Briggs TW (2004) The use of chondrogide membrane in autologous chondrocyte implantation. Knee 11:51–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hangody L, Feczko P, Bartha L, Bodo G, Kish G (2001) Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular defects of the knee and ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:S328–S336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Henderson I, Francisco R, Oakes B, Cameron J (2005) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for treatment of focal chondral defects of the knee—a clinical, arthroscopic, MRI and histologic evaluation at 2 years. Knee 12:209–216

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Henderson I, Lavigne P, Valenzuela H, Oakes B (2007) Autologous chondrocyte implantation: superior biologic properties of hyaline cartilage repairs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:253–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Henderson IJ, Lavigne P (2006) Periosteal autologous chondrocyte implantation for patellar chondral defect in patients with normal and abnormal patellar tracking. Knee 13:274–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huberti HH, Hayes WC (1984) Patellofemoral contact pressures. The influence of q-angle and tendofemoral contact. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:715–724

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Koukoulias N, Papastergiou S, Kazakos K, Poulios G, Parisis K (2007) Clinical results of meniscus repair with the meniscus arrow: a 4- to 8-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kreuz PC, Erggelet C, Steinwachs MR, Krause SJ, Lahm A, Niemeyer P, Ghanem N, Uhl M, Sudkamp N (2006) Is microfracture of chondral defects in the knee associated with different results in patients aged 40 years or younger? Arthroscopy 22:1180–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kreuz PC, Steinwachs MR, Erggelet C, Krause SJ, Konrad G, Uhl M, Sudkamp N (2006) Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14:1119–1125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lane Smith R, Trindade MC, Ikenoue T, Mohtai M, Das P, Carter DR, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ (2000) Effects of shear stress on articular chondrocyte metabolism. Biorheology 37:95–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lindahl A, Brittberg M, Peterson L (2001) Health economics benefits following autologous chondrocyte transplantation for patients with focal chondral lesions of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:358–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lorentzon R, Alfredson H, Hildingsson C (1998) Treatment of deep cartilage defects of the patella with periosteal transplantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:202–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Minas T (1998) Chondrocyte implantation in the repair of chondral lesions of the knee: economics and quality of life. Am J Orthop 27:739–744

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Minas T, Bryant T (2005) The role of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the patellofemoral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:30–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mooar LA (1989) A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. Clin Orthop Relat Res 246:238–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nyland J, Hester P, Caborn DN (2002) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue: 2-year postoperative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:274–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Perka C, Schultz O, Sittinger M, Zippel H (2000) Chondrocyte transplantation in PGLA/polydioxanone fleece. Orthopade 29:112–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Petersen L, Brittberg M, Lindahl A (2003) Autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the ankle. Foot Ankle Clin 8:291–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Peterson L, Brittberg M, Kiviranta I, Akerlund EL, Lindahl A (2002) Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Biomechanics and long-term durability. Am J Sports Med 30:2–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, Nilsson A, Sjogren-Jansson E, Lindahl A (2000) Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 374:212–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pidoriano AJ, Weinstein RN, Buuck DA, Fulkerson JP (1997) Correlation of patellar articular lesions with results from anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer. Am J Sports Med 25:533–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Risberg MA, Holm I, Steen H, Beynnon BD (1999) Sensitivity to changes over time for the IKDC form, the Lysholm score, and the Cincinnati knee score. A prospective study of 120 ACL reconstructed patients with a 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:152–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schonholtz GJ, Ling B (1985) Arthroscopic chondroplasty of the patella. Arthroscopy 1:92–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sernert N, Kartus J, Kohler K, Stener S, Larsson J, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1999) Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A follow-up of 527 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:160–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Steinwachs MR, Kreuz PC (2003) Clinical results of autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) using a collagen membrane. In: Nöth U, Hendrich C, Eulert J (eds) Cartilage surgery and future perspectives, Chap 5. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 37–47

    Google Scholar 

  40. Steinwachs MR, Kreuz PC, Krause SJ, Lahm A (2003) Klinische Ergebnisse nach Mikrofrakturierung bei der Behandlung von Gelenkknorpeldefekten. Sportorthopädie Sporttraumatologie 19:291–294

    Google Scholar 

  41. Torzilli PA, Deng XH, Ramcharan M (2006) Effect of compressive strain on cell viability in statically loaded articular cartilage. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 5:123–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79095, Freiburg i. Br., Germany

    Philipp Niemeyer, Matthias Steinwachs, Christoph Erggelet, Peter C. Kreuz, Nina Kraft, Wolfgang Köstler, Alexander Mehlhorn & Norbert P. Südkamp

  2. Arthrose Clinic Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Christoph Erggelet

Authors
  1. Philipp Niemeyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Steinwachs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christoph Erggelet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter C. Kreuz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nina Kraft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wolfgang Köstler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alexander Mehlhorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Norbert P. Südkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Niemeyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niemeyer, P., Steinwachs, M., Erggelet, C. et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of retropatellar cartilage defects: clinical results referred to defect localisation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 1223–1231 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0413-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0413-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation