Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term results of the metal-cancellous cementless Lübeck total hip arthroplasty: a critical review at 12.8 years

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: The influence of a spongy metal surface total hip arthroplasty (THA) (S&G, ESKA, Lübeck, Germany) on the clinical, psychometric, and radiograhic long-term results were examined. Material and methods: An amount of 137 THA with the cementless spongy metal Lübeck hip prosthesis were evaluated long-term, radiographically and clinically, with a mean follow-up time of 12.8 years (range 10.1–14.9 years). The MOS SF-36 was used to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQL). Results: Cumulative survival rates were 90% (±8%) for the cups and 86% (±5%) for the stems at 14.9 years. Four stems fractured at the middle part (3%) without major trauma. In the remaining patients the clinical results expressed as Harris Hip Score (HHS) averaged 88 (range 34–100). Patients above 60 years undergoing THA had no significant difference in HRQL (MOS SF-36) in comparison to the age-matched healthy population (P>0.05). Patients younger than 60 years had scores lower than normal in the physical function domains (P<0.01), but were comparable in the mental health domains (P>0.05). Radiolucent lines and bone atrophy related to stress shielding by distal fixation were found in the periprosthetic Gruen Zone I (19.8, 16.8%) and VII (10.3, 27.1%) of the proximal femur. Discussion: Whereas the rate of aseptic cup failures of the cementless spongy metal Lübeck hip prosthesis is among the best, the failure rate of the stems is attributable to osteolysis of the proximal femur. The fractures of the stem may be attributed to the combination of the lack of proximal support, the fully porous stem made of a cast cobalt-chrome-molybdenum alloy, and the narrow dimension of the stem core. The long-term results of the spongy metal cup are good, whereas the high loosening and fracture rate of fully coated stem are a source of concern especially with regard to the difficult revision scenario with frequent massive bone loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aaronson NK, Acquadro C, Alonso J, et al. (1992) International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Qual Life Res 1:349–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldinger PR, Breusch SJ, Lukoschek M, Mau H, Ewerbeck V, Thomsen M (2003) A ten- to 15-year follow-up of the Cementless Spotorno stem. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85-B:209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bachmeier CJM, March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley HM, Tribe KL, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM (2001) A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthr Cartil 9:137–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 55-A:1629–1632

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bryant MJ, Kernohan WG, Nixon JR, Mollan RA (1993) A statistical analysis of hip scores. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75-B:705–709

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I, Ware J (1995) The German SF-36 health Survey. Z f. Gesundheitswiss 3:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121:20–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1992) Roentgenographic assessment of biologic fixation of pourous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 84:310–312

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gaffey JL, Callaghan JJ, Pedersen DR, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (2004) Cementless acetabular fixation at 15 years. A comparison with the same surgeon’s results following acetabular fixation with cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A:257–261

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grübl A, Chiari C, Gruber M, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F (2002) Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, rectangular titanium stem and a threaded cup. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84-A:425–431

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HM (1979) Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of results evaluating. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 51-A:737–755

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henssge EJ, Grundei H, Etspüler R, Köller W, Fink K (1985) Anatomically adapted endoprotsthesis of the proximal end of the femur. Z Orthop 123:821–828

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME (2000) Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol 27:1745–1752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kishida Y, Sugano N, Ohzono K, Sakai T, Nishii T, Yoshikawa H (2002) Stem fracture of the cementless spongy metal Lubeck hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 17:1021–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schuhmacher L, Thomas BJ, Kilgus DJ, Finerman GA (1996) Differences between patients’ and physicians’ evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 78-A:835–838

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schuhmacher L, Kilgus DJ, Thomas BJ, Finerman GA (1997) Outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Comparison of a traditional disease-specific and a quality-of-life measurement of outcome. J Arthroplasty 12:639–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN (2000) The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 27:1745–1752

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garrelick G, Sodermann P (2002) The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84-A(Suppl):2–20

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matsui M, Nakata K, Masuhara K, Ohzono K, Sugano N, Ochi T (1998) The metal-cancellous cementless lübeck total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 80-B:404–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE (1993) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31:247–631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mittelmeier W, Grunwald I, Schaefer R, Steinhauser E, Gradinger R (1999) Comparative static biomechanical studies of tripod surface structures of cementless endoprotheses. Z Orthop 137:122–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode C (1993) Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 75-A:697–704

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Institute of Health (1998) Conventions in total hip surgery. Ministry of health, London, GB

  25. Nunn D, Freeman MA, Hill PF, Evans SJW (1989) The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 71:629–631

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Parvizi J, Sullivan T, Duffy G, Cabanela ME (2004) Fifteen-year clinical survivorship of Harris-Galante total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:672–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pellegrini VD Jr, Konski AA, Gastel JA, Rubin P, Evarts CM (2000) Prevention of heterotopic ossification with irradiation after total hip arthroplasty. Radiation therapy with a single dose of eight hundred centigray administered to a limited field. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 74-A:186–200

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pillar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop 208:108–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Plötz W, Gradinger R, Rechl H, Ascherl R, Wicke-Wittenius S, Hipp E (1992) Cementless prosthesis of the hip joint with “spongy metal” surface. A prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 11:102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Runkel M, Jaeger U, Wenda K, Degreif J, Rudig L, Ritter G (1994) Results of implantation of uncemented porous metal hip prostheses. Unfallchirurgie 20:76–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sielewicz M, Scholz J, Hanslik L (1989) A five year follow-up of 605 cases of the MCCL (Metal-Cancellous Cementless Lübeck) total hip prosthesis. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 15:433–443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P (2000) Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: part 1 general health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedisch national total hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 71:349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sugano N, Saito S, Takaoka K, Ohzono K, Masuhara K, Saito M, Ono K (1994) Spongy metal Lubeck hip prostheses for osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia. A 2–6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 9:253–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sutherland C, Wilde AH, Borden LS, Marks KE (1982) A ten year follow up of one hundred consecutive Müller curved stem total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64-A:970–982

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tarlov AR, Ware JE, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M (1983) The medical outcomes study: an application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. J Am Med Ass 262:925–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vervest T, Anderson PG, Van Hout F, Wapstra FH, Louwerse RT, Koetsier JW (2005) Ten to twelve-year results with the Zweymuller cementless total hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 20:362–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yamaguchi K, Masuhara K, Ohzono K, Sugano N, Nishii T, Ochi T (2000) Evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. The influence of the extent of porous coating. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 82-A:1426–1431

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, et al. (1995) Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the medical outcomes study. Med Care 33:264–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Götze.

Additional information

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Götze, C., Tschugunow, A., Götze, H. et al. Long-term results of the metal-cancellous cementless Lübeck total hip arthroplasty: a critical review at 12.8 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126, 28–35 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0064-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0064-7

Keywords

Navigation