Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gerüsttragende Bioprothesen in Aortenposition

Scaffold-bearing biological prostheses in aortic position

  • Kommentar
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Herz-,Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Funkat AK, Beckmann A, Lewandowski et al (2012) Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2011: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60:371–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aboud A, Breuer M, Bossert T, Gummert JF (2009) Quality of life after mechanical vs. biological aortic valve replacement. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 17:35–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruzicka DJ, Hettich I, Hutter A et al (2009) The complete supraannular concept: in vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses. Circulation 120(11 Suppl):S139–S145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schoen FJ (2008) Evolving concepts of cardiac valve dynamics: the continuum of development, functional structure, pathobiology, and tissue engineering. Circulation 118:1864–1880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aicher D, Holz A, Feldner S et al (2011) Quality of life after aortic valve surgery: replacement versus reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142:e19–e24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gerosa G, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Bottio T (2006) Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:1058–1064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P (2011) Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update. Curr Cardiol Rep 13:250–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nair SK, Bhatnagar G, Valencia O, Chandrasekaran V (2010) Effect of valve suture technique on incidence of paraprosthetic regurgitation and 10-year survival. Ann Thorac Surg 89:1171–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. David TE, Armstrong S, Maganti M (2010) Hancock II bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: the gold standard of bioprosthetic valves durability? Ann Thorac Surg 90:775–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McClure RS, Narayanasamy N, Wiegerinck E et al (2010) Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1000 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 89:1410–1416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Valfrè C, Ius P, Minniti G, Salvador et al (2010) The fate of Hancock II porcine valve recipients 25 years after implant. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 38:141–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT et al (2005) Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance over 20 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130:994–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davierwala PM, Borger MA, David TE et al (2006) Reoperation is not an independent predictor of mortality during aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131:329–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eggebrecht H, Schäfer U, Treede H et al (2011) Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:1218–1227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoffmann G, Lutter G, Cremer J (2008) Durability of bioprosthetic cardiac valves. Dtsch Arztebl Int 105:143–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weber A, Noureddine H, Englberger L et al (2012) Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:1075–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beckmann A, Hamm C, Figulla HR et al (2012) The German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY): a nationwide registry for patients undergoing invasive therapy for severe aortic valve stenosis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60:319–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 18, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland

    G. Hoffmann, J. Schöttler &  J. Cremer

Authors
  1. G. Hoffmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Schöttler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Cremer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Cremer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffmann, G., Schöttler, J. & Cremer, J. Gerüsttragende Bioprothesen in Aortenposition. Z Herz- Thorax- Gefäßchir 27, 177–179 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-013-1012-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-013-1012-4

Search

Navigation