Abstract
Purpose
Restoration of continence remains a major challenge in patients after abdominoperineal rectal excision (APE) or with end-stage fecal incontinence. A new surgical technique, the neurostimulated levator augmentation, was introduced for pelvic floor augmentation using dynamic graciloplasty in order to restore anorectal angulation. The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and efficiency.
Methods
From November 2009 to March 2014, n = 17 patients underwent neurostimulated levator augmentation (n = 10 after APE, n = 5 intractable idiopathic fecal incontinence, n = 2 traumatic anal amputation). Gracilis muscle was transposed through the obturator foramen into the pelvic cavity, positioned in a U-shaped sling behind the rectum, fixed to the contralateral os pubis to restore anorectal angulation, and then conditioned by neurostimulation. Questionnaires analyzing function and quality of life were administered.
Results
For neurostimulated levator augmentation, four patients suffered from complications that needed operative intervention (n = 3 wound infection, n = 1 colon perforation); three pharmacological treatment and two complications needed no further invasive intervention. One patient died due to causes unrelated to the operation, and no complication required intensive care management. Fecal incontinence in patients with idiopathic incontinence improved significantly after surgery as well as incontinence episodes, urgency, and disease-specific quality of life through all dimensions. Generic quality of life was significantly better after surgery in all patients. After median follow-up of 17 months (2–45), all but one patient would undergo the procedure again.
Conclusions
Neurostimulated levator augmentation was feasible in all patients with acceptable morbidity. It may represent a new therapeutic option in selected patients with intractable fecal incontinence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS et al (2009) Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology 137:512–517
Nelson RL (2004) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126:S3–S7
Markland AD, Goode PS, Burgio KL et al (2010) Incidence and risk factors for fecal incontinence in black and white older adults: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 58:1341–1346
Alsheik EH, Coyne T, Hawes SK et al (2010) Fecal incontinence: prevalence, severity, and quality of life data from an outpatient gastroenterology practice. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012:947694
Chatoor DR, Taylor SJ, Cohen CR, Emmanuel AV (2007) Faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 94:134–144
Baeten CG, Konsten J, Spaans F et al (1991) Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 338:1163–1165
Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM et al (1995) Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 332:1600–1605
Ho KS, Seow-Choen F (2005) Dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal tumour. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:38–41
Baeten C, Spaans F, Fluks A (1988) An implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 31:134–137
Wexner SD, Baeten C, Bailey R et al (2002) Long-term efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 45:809–918
Rongen MJ, Uludag O, El Naggar K, Geerdes BP, Konsten J, Baeten CG (2003) Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46:716–721
Fernández-Fraga X, Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR (2002) Significance of pelvic floor muscles in anal incontinence. Gastroenterology 123:1441–1450
Zufferey G, Perneger T, Robert-Yap J, Rubay R, Lkhagvabayar B, Roche B (2009) Measure of the voluntary contraction of the puborectal sling as a predictor of successful sphincter repair in the treatment of anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 52:704–710
How P, Evans J, Moran B, Swift I, Brown G (2012) Preoperative MRI sphincter morphology and anal manometry: can they be markers of functional outcome following anterior resection for rectal cancer? Color Dis 14:e339–e345
Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Kernéis S et al (2009) Abdomino-perineal resection for anal cancer: impact of a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap on survival, recurrence, morbidity, and wound healing. Ann Surg 250:707–711
Butler CE, Gündeslioglu AO, Rodriguez-Bigas MA (2008) Outcomes of immediate vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects. J Am Coll Surg 206:694–703
Nassar OA (2011) Modified pseudocontinent perineal colostomy: a special technique. Dis Colon Rectum 54:718–728
Rückauer KD (2001) Dynamic graciloplasty in children with fecal incontinence: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 36:1036–1039
Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97
Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1525–1532
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685
Rabin R, de Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33:337–343
Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (2000) Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–16
Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP (1995) Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 346:1124–1127
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
Cavina E, Seccia M, Banti P, Zocco G (1998) Anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection. Experience with double-wrap graciloplasty supported by low-frequency electrostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1010–1016
Baeten CG, Bailey HR, Bakka A et al (2000) Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum 43:743–751
Madoff RD, Rosen HR, Baeten CG et al (1999) Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: lessons from a prospective, multicenter trial. Gastroenterology 116:549–556
Tillin T, Gannon K, Feldman RA, Williams NS (2006) Third-party prospective evaluation of patient outcomes after dynamic graciloplasty. Br J Surg 93:1402–1410
Thornton MJ, Kennedy ML, Lubowski DZ, King DW (2004) Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for faecal incontinence. Color Dis 6:470–476
Parks AG (1975) Royal Society of Medicine, Section of Proctology; Meeting 27 November 1974. President’s Address. Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 68:681–690
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Isbert, C., Schlegel, N., Reibetanz, J. et al. Neurostimulated levator augmentation—a new approach in restoring continence. Int J Colorectal Dis 30, 505–512 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2134-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2134-9