Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mentored trainees obtain comparable operative results to experts in complex laparoscopic colorectal surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an expert monitoring on the quality and results of laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure (LRHP) performed by trainee surgeons by comparing their results to the expert's outcomes.

Methods

Forty-two LRHP were performed between 2000 and 2008 following a step-by-step, standardised, full laparoscopic procedure. Patients operated upon by a senior surgeon were compared to patients operated upon by trainee surgeons while being mentored by the senior surgeon. Operative time, conversion, complications and post-operative outcome were measured.

Results

Each group included 21 patients. All patients underwent LRHP successfully. Two procedures were converted. No significant difference was observed between the expert and the trainees: operative time, 132 min (SD ± 50) vs. 131 min (SD ± 47) and complications (2–14%), 4 vs. 2. Three complications required re-operation, and three other were treated medically, including one dilatation of an anastomosis. Post-operative outcomes were comparable (oral intake, 3 vs. 2 days; post-operative hospital stay, 6 vs. 7.5 days); no mortality occurred.

Conclusions

Standardisation simplifies this difficult laparoscopic procedure and offers the same outcome whether it is performed by an expert or by mentored trainees. The complications were comparable to those occurring at experienced centres (anastomotic leak or stricture, ureteral injury, re-operation). The expert mentoring does not prevent all complications but can solve intra-operative technical problems, thus improving the trainee's confidence. Mentoring should be promoted as it can be performed locally or remotely using modern interactive technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mutter D, Vix M, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2011) WeBSurg: an innovative educational web site in minimally invasive surgery—principles and results. Surg Innov 18(1):8–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maeda T, Tan KY, Konishi F, Tsujinaka S, Mizokami K, Sasaki J, Kawamura YJ (2009) Trainee surgeons do not cause more conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if they are well supervised. World J Surg 33:2439–2443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143:762–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leroy J, Costantino F, Cahill RA, D'Agostino J, Wu WH, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2011) Technical aspects and outcome of a standardized full laparoscopic approach to the reversal of Hartmann's procedure in a teaching centre. Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02389.x

  5. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopic-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anonymous (2000) Guidelines for the surgical practice of telemedicine. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 14:975–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sereno S, Mutter D, Dallemagne B, Smith CD, Marescaux J (2007) Telementoring for minimally invasive surgical training by wireless robot. Surg Innov 14:184–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Anvari M (2007) Telesurgery: remote knowledge translation in clinical surgery. World J Surg 31:1545–1550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 27(413):379–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Scheidbach H, Lippert H (2010) Letter in response to: Mazeh H, Greenstein AJ, Swedish K, Nguyen SQ, Lipskar A, Weber KJ, Chin EH, Divino CM (2009) Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a comparative retrospective analysis (Surg Endosc 23:496–502). Surg Endosc 24:229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen MJ, Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford T (2005) Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann procedure. Am J Surg 189:670–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosen MJ, Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2006) Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: a comparative analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 10:895–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mazeh H, Greenstein AJ, Swedish K, Nguyen SQ, Lipskar A, Weber KJ, Chin EH, Divino CM (2009) Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann's procedure—a comparative retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 23:496–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Regadas FS, Siebra JA, Rodrigues LV, Nicodemo AM, Reis Neto JA (1996) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal anastomose post Hartmann's procedure. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Haughn C, Ju B, Uchal M, Arnaud JP, Reed JF, Bergamaschi R (2008) Complication rates after Hartmann's reversal: open or laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 123:2–1236

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khaikin M, Zmora O, Rosin V, Bar-Zakai B, Goldes Y, Shabtai M, Ayalon A, Munz Y (2006) Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann procedure. Surg Endosc 20:1883–1886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mutter D, Evrard S, Nord M, Marescaux J (1994) Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure. Dig Surg 11:10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sosa JL, Sleeman D, Puente I, McKenney MG, Hartmann R (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted colostomy closure after Hartmann's procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 37:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vacher C, Zaghloul R, Borie F, Laporte S, Callafe R, Skawinski P, Leynau G, Domergue J (2002) Laparoscopic re-establishment of digestive continuity following Hartmann's procedure. Retrospective study of the French Society of Endoscopic Surgery. Ann Chir 127:189–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Aydin HN, Remzi FH, Tekkis PP, Fazio VW (2005) Hartmann's reversal is associated with high postoperative adverse events. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2117–2126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Guy Temporal and Alberto Berenguer for their English proofreading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IRCAD-EITS Institute, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1 Place de l’Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France

    Federico Costantino, Didier Mutter, Jacopo D’Agostino, Mario Dente, Joël Leroy & Jacques Marescaux

  2. Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua City, Taiwan

    Hurng Sheng Wu

Authors
  1. Federico Costantino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Didier Mutter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jacopo D’Agostino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mario Dente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joël Leroy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hurng Sheng Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jacques Marescaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Marescaux.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costantino, F., Mutter, D., D’Agostino, J. et al. Mentored trainees obtain comparable operative results to experts in complex laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 27, 65–69 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1290-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1290-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation