Skip to main content
Log in

Letter to the Editor

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Brolin RE, Semmlow JL, Sehonanda A, et al (1989) Comparison of five methods of assessment of intestinal viability. Surg Gynecol Obstet 168: 6–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Turkyilmaz Z, Sonmez K, Basaklar AC (1997) Assessment of anastomotic reliability with pulse oximetry in graded intestinal ischaemia: an experimental study in dogs. J Pediatr Surg 32: 1728–1731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mars M, Hadley GP (1994) Failure of pulse oximetry in the assessment of raised limb intracompartmental pressure. Injury 25(6): 379–381

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Graham B, Paulus DA, Coffee HH (1986) Pulse oximetry for vascular monitoring on upper extremity replantation surgery. J Hand Surg 11(5): 687–692

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hadley, G.P., Mars, M. Letter to the Editor. Ped Surgery Int 19, 130 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-002-0769-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-002-0769-4

Keywords

Navigation