Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical treatment of patients with myelomeningocele-related spine deformities: study of 26 cases

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Scoliosis, kyphosis, and sacral agenesis (SA) are common spine deformities in myelomeningocele (MMC) patients. Surgery of spine deformities in MMC patients is associated with various difficulties as infection, pathological skin breakage, instrumentation failure, and neurological deterioration. The purposes of this study are to share our clinical experience and discuss different surgical techniques which are defined in the literature.

Patients and method

We retrospectively evaluated our database of patients with MMC who underwent surgical procedures for spine deformities from 2014 to 2016. Demographic and clinical data, surgical parameters, surgical techniques and levels, pre- and postoperative deformity angles, level of posterior fusion defect, spinal malformations, neurological evaluation of lower extremities and complications were collated. We divided the cases into three groups according to the type of deformities. The groups were lumbar kyphosis (Group 1), congenital scoliosis (Group 2), and paralytic scoliosis (Group 3).

Results

There were 26 patients in the study. Fifteen patients were male and 11 patients were female. The median age of the patients was 8.03 (range = 3–17 years) at the time of operation. There were 10 patients in Group 1, 7 patients in Group 2, and 9 patients in Group 3. In Group 1, preoperative kyphosis angle varied between 51° and 160°, with an average of 95.7°. In Group 2, preoperative Cobb angle varied between 57° and 150°, with an average of 106.6°. Kyphosis was present in 4 patients. Preoperative kyphosis angle varied between 74° and 140°, with an average of 93°. In Group 3, preoperative Cobb angle varied between 45° and 145°, with an average of 72.5°.

Conclusion

Spinal deformity in children with MMC has been considered to cause severe disability. Surgical treatment is a challenging procedure with a wide spectrum of complications, but can provide good correction of spinal deformity and pelvic obliquity, and improve the quality of life. Self-growing systems which are a new alternative to traditional growing rod systems, must be considered to preserve growing potential of spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mummareddy N, Dewan MC, Mercier MR, Naftel RP, Wellons JC 3rd, Bonfield CM (2017) Scoliosis in myelomeningocele: epidemiology, management, and functional outcome. J Neurosurg Pediatr 20(1):99–108. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.2.PEDS16641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunn RN, Bomela LN (2016) Kyphectomy in children with severe myelomeningocele-related kyphosis. Spine Deformity 4(3):230–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.11.006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Balioglu MB, Akman YE, Ucpunar H, Albayrak A, Kargin D, Atici Y, Buyuk AF (2016) Sacral agenesis: evaluation of accompanying pathologies in 38 cases, with analysis of long-term outcomes. Childs Nerv Syst : ChNS : Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg 32(9):1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3022-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dias MS (2005) Neurosurgical causes of scoliosis in patients with myelomeningocele: an evidence-based literature review. J Neurosurg 103(1 Suppl):24–35. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2005.103.1.0024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanli T, Kahraman S, Enercan M, Hamzaoglu A, Karadereller S, Kaya O, Ucar BY, Ok N, Baymurat AC, Alrashdan A (2016) Sliding-growing rod technique in the treatment of early onset scoliosis: clinical and radiological outcomes and effect on pulmonary functions. Spine Deformity 4(6):448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2016.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ucar BY (2014) A new corrective technique for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (Ucar's convex rod rotation). J Craniovertebral Junction Spine 5(3):114–117. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.142304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geiger F, Parsch D, Carstens C (1999) Complications of scoliosis surgery in children with myelomeningocele. Eur Spine J : Off Publ Eur Spine Soc,Eur Spinal Deformity Soc Eur Sect Cervical Spine Res Soc 8(1):22–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Keessen W, van Ooy A, Pavlov P, Pruijs JE, Scheers MM, Slot G, Verbout A, Wijers HM (1992) Treatment of spinal deformity in myelomeningocele: a retrospective study in four hospitals. Europ J Pediatr Surg : Off J Aust Assoc Pediatr Surg [et al] = Z Kinderchir 2(Suppl 1):18–22. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1063492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parsch D, Geiger F, Brocai DR, Lang RD, Carstens C (2001) Surgical management of paralytic scoliosis in myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Orthop B 10(1):10–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh D, Rath GP, Dash HH, Bithal PK (2010) Anesthetic concerns and perioperative complications in repair of myelomeningocele: a retrospective review of 135 cases. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 22(1):11–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181bb44a9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson GH, Akbarnia BA, Campbell RM Jr (2007) Growing rod techniques in early-onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 27(3):354–361. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3180333eea

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ouellet J (2011) Surgical technique: modern Luque trolley, a self-growing rod technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(5):1356–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1783-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Elsebai HB, Yazici M, Thompson GH, Emans JB, Skaggs DL, Crawford AH, Karlin LI, McCarthy RE, Poe-Kochert C, Kostial P, Akbarnia BA (2011) Safety and efficacy of growing rod technique for pediatric congenital spinal deformities. J Pediatr Orthop 31(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e318202c1f0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bas CE, Preminger J, Olgun ZD, Demirkiran G, Sponseller P, Yazici M, Growing Spine Study G (2015) Safety and efficacy of apical resection following growth-friendly instrumentation in myelomeningocele patients with Gibbus: growing rod versus Luque trolley. J Pediatr Orthop 35(8):e98–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Amoreira GR, Quiroga MR, Gomes CR, de Araujo HJ (2013) Kyphectomy in meningomyelocele children: surgical technique, risk analysis, and improvement of kyphosis. Childs Nerv Syst : ChNS : Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg 29(7):1137–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2035-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang SW, Thomas JG, Blumberg TJ, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Dauser RC, Luerssen TG, Jea A (2011) Kyphectomy in patients with myelomeningocele treated with pedicle screw-only constructs: case reports and review. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.4.PEDS1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaplan SC, Eksi MS, Bayri Y, Toktas ZO, Konya D (2015) Kyphectomy and pedicular screw fixation with posterior-only approach in pediatric patients with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 50(3):133–144. https://doi.org/10.1159/000430467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Emami-Naeini P, Rahbar Z, Nejat F, Kajbafzadeh A, El Khashab M (2010) Neurological presentations, imaging, and associated anomalies in 50 patients with sacral agenesis. Neurosurgery 67(4):894–900; discussion 900. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181eb500d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ko AL, Song K, Ellenbogen RG, Avellino AM (2007) Retrospective review of multilevel spinal fusion combined with spinal cord transection for treatment of kyphoscoliosis in pediatric myelomeningocele patients. Spine 32(22):2493–2501. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181573b11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Linthorst JI, Veenboer PW, Dik P, Pruijs HE, Han SK, de Kort LM, de Jong TP (2014) Spinal cord transection before scoliosis correction in myelomeningocele may improve bladder function. Neurourol Urodyn 33(1):121–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mehta VA, Gottfried ON, McGirt MJ, Gokaslan ZL, Ahn ES, Jallo GI (2011) Safety and efficacy of concurrent pediatric spinal cord untethering and deformity correction. J Spinal Disord Tech 24(6):401–405. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182019f4d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huseyin Canaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Canaz, H., Alatas, I., Canaz, G. et al. Surgical treatment of patients with myelomeningocele-related spine deformities: study of 26 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 34, 1367–1374 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-3731-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-3731-z

Keywords

Navigation