Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fetal hydrocephalus

  • Special Annual Issue
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Hydrocephalus is the most frequent and devastating illness affecting a fetus. The development of both ultrasonography and magnetic resonance, associated with laboratorial tests, has greatly facilitated its diagnosis.

Materials and methods

In the Fetal Medicine Service of the Federal University of São Paulo and in the Santa Joana/Pro-Matre Paulista Hospital Complex, in São Paulo, SP, Brazil, repeated cephalocenteses, ventricular-amniotic shunting, and neuroendoscopy were used to treat 57 fetuses with hydrocephalus, all of them at a gestational age under 32 weeks. Another eight fetuses had myelomeningocele and underwent correctional open surgery to prevent hydrocephalus.

Results

Thirty-nine patients were followed up for a period longer than 3 years and had their intelligence coefficient assessed: 26 of them were considered normal (IQ above 70); six had mild or moderate handicaps (IQ from 35 to 70), and seven were severely handicapped (IQ below 35). Out of the eight patients operated for correction of myelomeningocele, only two came to require shunting. There were no cases of maternal morbidity, and no infectious condition was observed in any of the patients subjected to intrauterine treatment.

Conclusion

Selected cases of isolated, evolutive, non-destructive hydrocephaly diagnosed before 32 gestational weeks may benefit from fetal neurosurgical procedures. With the accuracy improvement of diagnoses, the number of patients fitting into that group has become very small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, Brock JW (2011) A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 17:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  2. Almodin CG, Moron AF, Cavalheiro S, Yamashita A (2006) The Almodin–Moron trocar for uterine entry during fetal surgery. Fetal Diagn Ther 21:414–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alter M (1962) Anencephalus, hydrocephalus and spina bifida. Arch Neurol 7:411–422

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley BR, Levine D (2007) What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal sonographic diagnosis of ventriculomegaly? J Ultrasound Med 26:1513–1522

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bickers DS, Adams RD (1949) Hereditary stenosis of the aqueduct of sylvius as a cause of congenital hydrocephalus. Brain 72:246–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Birnholz JC, Frigoletto FD (1981) Antenatal treatment of hydrocephalus. N Engl J Med 304:1021–1023

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruner JP, Tulipan N, Davis GH (2001) Open fetal surgery for nonlethal malformations. Infertility and reproductive medicine. Clinics of North America 12:829–840

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buxton N, Macarthur D, Malluci C, Punt J, Vloeberghs M (1998) Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients less than 1 year old. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:73–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cavalheiro S, Moron AF, Zymberg ST, Dastoli P (2003) Fetal hydrocephalus—prenatal treatment. Childs Nerv Syst 19:561–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cavalheiro S, Sparapani FVC, Moron AF, Silva MC, Stávale JN (2002) Fetal meningeal hemangiopericytoma. J Neurosurg 97:1217–1220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cavalheiro S, Uchiyama M, Santana RM, Pares DBS, Rogano LA, Camano L, Braga FM (1992) Hidrocefalia fetal. J Bras Neurocirurg 3:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chervenak FA, Ment LR, McClure M, Berkowitz RL, Duncan C, Hobbins C, Scott D (1984) Outcome of fetal ventriculomegaly. Lancet 2:179–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chervenak FA, Isaacson NG, Hobbiens JC, Berkowitz RL (1985) Diagnosis and management of fetal holoprosencephaly. Obstet Gynecol 66:322–326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clark RG, Milhorat TH (1970) Experimental hydrocephalus—light microscopic findings in acute and subacute obstrutive hydrocephalus in the monkey. J Neurosurg 32:400–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Clewel WH, Manco-Johnson ML, Meyer PR, Newkirk JB, Zide SZ (1982) A surgical approach to the treatment of fetal hydrocephalus. N England J Med 306:1320–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cochrane DD, Myles ST, Nimrod C, Still DK, Sugarman RG, Wittmann BK (1985) Intrauterine hydrocephalus associated abnormalities and fetal outcome. Can J Neurol Sci 12:51–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dill P, Poretti A, Boltshauser E, Huisman TA (2009) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in midline malformations of the central nervous system and review of the literature. J Neuroradiol 36:138–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Edwards MSD, Harrison MR, Halks-Miller M, Nakayama DK, Berger MS, Glick PL, Chinn DH (1984) Kaolin induced congenital hydrocephalus in utero in fetal lambs and Rhesus monkeys. J Neurosurg 60:115–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Frigoletto FD, Birnholz JC, Greene NF (1992) Antenatal treatment of hydrocephalus by ventriculoamniotic shunting. JAMA 248:2496–2497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Futagi Y, Suzuki Y, Toribe Y, Morimoto K (2002) Neurodevelopmental outcome in children with fetal hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurol 27:111–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Garne E, Loane M, Addor MC, Boyd PA (2010) Congenital hydrocephalus—prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy in four European regions. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 14:150–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gorayeb RP, Cavalheiro S, Zymberg ST (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 1 year of age. J Neurosurg 100:427–429

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hotta Y, Honda T, Makato N, Kuwano R (2003) Developmental distribution of coxsackie virus and adenovirus receptor localized in the nervous system. Dev Res Dev Brain Res 143:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeanty P, Dramaix-Wilmet M, Delbeke D, Rodesch F, Struyven J (1981) Ultrasonic evaluation of fetal ventricular growth. Neuroradiol 21:127–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Konstantinidou A, Anninos H, Spanakis N, Kotsiakis X (2007) Transplacental infection of coxsackievirus B3 pathological findings in the fetus. J Med Virol 79:754–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leidig E, Dannecker G, Pefeifer KH, Salinas R, Pfeifer G (1988) Intrauterine development of posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Eur J Pediatr 147:26–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Levine D, Trop I, Mehta TS, Barnes PD (2002) MR imaging appearance of fetal cerebral ventricular morphology. Radiology 223:652–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Malpas P (1937) The incidence of human malformations and the significance of changes in the maternal environment in the causation. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 44:434–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Manning FA, Harrison MR, Rodeck C, Members of the International Fetal Medicine and Surgery Society (1986) Catheter shunts for fetal hydronefrosis and hydrocephalus: report of the international fetal surgery registry. N Engl J Med 315:336–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Moutard ML, Kieffer V, Feingold J, Kieffer F (2003) Agenesis of corpus callosum: prenatal diagnosis and prognosis. Childs Nerv Syst 19:471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nomura LM, Barini R, De Andrade KC, Milanez H (2010) Congenital hydrocephalus: gestational and neonatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282:607–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oi S, Honda Y, Hidaka M, Sato O, Matsumoto S (1998) Intrauterine high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in fetal hydrocephalus and prenatal estimation of postnatal outcomes with “perspective classification”. J Neurosurg 88:685–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ornoy A, Tenenbaum A (2006) Pregnancy outcome following infections by coxsackie, echo, measles, mumps, hepatitis, polio and encephalitis viruses. Reprod Toxicol 21:446–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Peruzzi P, Corbitt R, Rafael C (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography for the in utero evaluation of central nervous system anomalies. J Neurosurg Pediatrics 6:340–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Renier WO, Haar BGAT, Slooff JL, Hustinx TWJ, Gabreels FJM (1982) X-linked congenital hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 84:113–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Stein SC, Feldman JG, Apfel S, Kolh SG, Casey G (1981) The epidemiology of congenital hydrocephalus. A study in Brooklyn, N.Y. 1968–1976. Childs Brain 8:253–262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Willems PJ, Brouwer OF, Dijkstra I, Wilmink J (1987) X-linked hydrocephalus. Am J Med Genet 27:921–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Cavalheiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cavalheiro, S., Moron, A.F., Almodin, C.G. et al. Fetal hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 27, 1575–1583 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1539-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1539-1

Keywords

Navigation