Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rapid recovery of motor and cognitive functions after resection of a right frontal lobe meningioma in a child

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to provide longitudinal data on neurological and neuropsychological restitution following resection of an extra-axial space-occupying lesion.

Case report

A comprehensive neuropsychological test battery was utilised preoperatively and 1, 4, 11, and 24 months, respectively, after removal of a parasagittal meningioma compressing the right frontal lobe in a right-handed 6-year-old boy with average intelligence.

Results

Symptoms related to brain compression (left-sided hemiparesis, diplopia) resolved shortly after surgery. Recovery of specific cognitive functions (short- and long-term memory, attention, and dichotic listening performance) was more protracted.

Conclusion

Here, we illustrate the potential of a structured follow-up analysis, based on neuropsychological testing. We were able to distinguish separate time-courses for neurological functions but even more distinct within complex neuropsychological processes. This time-dependent recovery should be considered when designing longitudinal follow-up studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marosi C, Hassler M, Roessler K, Reni M, Sant M, Mazza E, Vecht C (2008) Meningioma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 67:153–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rushing EJ, Olsen C, Mena H, Rueda ME, Lee YS, Keating RF, Packer RJ, Santi M (2005) Central nervous system meningiomas in the first two decades of life: a clinicopathological analysis of 87 patients. J Neurosurg 103:489–495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta R, Suri V, Jain A, Sharma MC, Sarkar C, Singh MM, Joshi NP, Puri T, Julka PK (2009) Anaplastic meningioma in an adolescent: a report of a rare case and brief review of literature. Childs Nerv Syst 25:241–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hugdahl K, Carlsson G, Uvebrant P, Lundervold AJ (1997) Dichotic-listening performance and intracarotid injections of amobarbital in children and adolescents. Preoperative and postoperative comparisons. Arch Neurol 54:1494–1500

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Posner MI, Petersen SE (1990) The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 13:25–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan J, McCandliss BD, Fossella J, Flombaum JI, Posner MI (2005) The activation of attentional networks. Neuroimage 26:471–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hugdahl K, Westerhausen R, Alho K, Medvedev S, Laine M, Hamalainen H (2009) Attention and cognitive control: unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scand J Psychol 50:11–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cattell RB, Weiss HR, Osterland J (1997) CFT1—Grundintelligenztest Skala 1. Testzentrale, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  9. Trites RL (1977) Neuropsychological test manual. Technolab, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beery KE (1989) The VMI-developmental test of visual-motor integration. Modern Curriculum Press, Cleveland, OH

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kimura D (1961) Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Can J Psychol 15:156–165

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Niccum N, Speaks C (1991) Interpretation of outcome on dichotic listening tests following stroke. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 13:614–628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hugdahl K, Andersson L (1986) The “forced-attention paradigm” in dichotic listening to CV-syllables: a comparison between adults and children. Cortex 22:417–432

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hugdahl K, Bodner T, Weiss E, Benke T (2003) Dichotic listening performance and frontal lobe function. Cogn Brain Res 16:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wechsler D (1999) WISC-III: Wechsler intelligence scale for children. Huber, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carlsson G (1997) Memory for words and drawings in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Scand J Psychol 38:265–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rugland AL (1990) Neuropsychological assessment of cognitive functioning in children with epilepsy. Epilepsia 31(Suppl 4):S41–S44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Carlsson G, Hugdahl K, Uvebrant P, Wiklund LM, von Wendt L (1992) Pathological left-handedness revisited: dichotic listening in children with left vs right congenital hemiplegia. Neuropsychologia 30:471–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hugdahl K, Carlsson G (1996) Dichotic listening performance in a monozygotic twin pair with left- and right-sided hemiplegia. Neurocase 2:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rypma B, Berger JS, D’Esposito M (2002) The influence of working-memory demand and subject performance on prefrontal cortical activity. J Cogn Neurosci 14:721–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson V, Jacobs R, Harvey AS (2005) Prefrontal lesions and attentional skills in childhood. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 11:817–831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Godefroy O (2003) Frontal syndrome and disorders of executive functions. J Neurol 250:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Desmurget M, Bonnetblanc F, Duffau H (2007) Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity. Brain 130:898–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tulving E, Kapur S, Markowitsch HJ, Craik FI, Habib R, Houle S (1994) Neuroanatomical correlates of retrieval in episodic memory: auditory sentence recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:2012–2015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deutsch G, Papanicolaou AC, Bourbon WT, Eisenberg HM (1987) Cerebral blood flow evidence of right frontal activation in attention demanding tasks. Int J Neurosci 36:23–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Posner MI (1994) Attention: the mechanisms of consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:7398–7403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Arruda JE, Walker KA, Weiler MD, Valentino DA (1999) Validation of a right hemisphere vigilance system as measured by principal component and factor analyzed quantitative electroencephalogram. Int J Psychophysiol 32:119–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Briere ME, Scott JG, Nall-Knapp RY, Adams RL (2008) Cognitive outcome in pediatric brain tumor survivors: delayed attention deficit at long-term follow-up. Pediatr Blood Cancer 50:337–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was gratefully supported by Barnhuset in Göteborg, Sweden, to GC. We gratefully acknowledge Prof. Kenneth Hugdahl, Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway, and Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, for his support and critical reading.

Disclosure

The authors do not report any conflict of interest concerning materials or methods used in this study or the findings identified in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Göran Carlsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlsson, G., Hufnagel, M., Jansen, O. et al. Rapid recovery of motor and cognitive functions after resection of a right frontal lobe meningioma in a child. Childs Nerv Syst 26, 105–111 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-0984-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-0984-6

Keywords

Navigation