Skip to main content
Log in

Symbiotic and genomic diversity of ‘cowpea’ bradyrhizobia from soils in Botswana and South Africa

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strain CB756 is usually an effective competitor against indigenous bradyrhizobia for nodulation of peanut in South Africa. Recently, inoculation of peanut and cowpea with CB756 in loamy sand soils of Botswana or a sandy clay loam in South Africa proved unsuccessful, achieving <2% nodule occupancy. A survey of ‘cowpea’ bradyrhizobia from five soils in Botswana and one in South Africa showed that many were effective in ability to fix N2 on peanut and cowpea. However, 15 isolates from Good Hope, Botswana were all effective on cowpea but ineffective on peanut, three failing to nodulate the latter. Selected cowpea isolates were significantly more competitive than CB756 for nodulation of cowpea in Leonard jars, but four were unsuccessful when inoculated at Roodeplaat, South Africa. When strain CB756 and two isolates were inoculated in pots containing Roodeplaat soil, at a 4:1 inoculant to soil bradyrhizobia ratio, their average nodule occupancy was 8% on cowpea compared to 40% on peanut. Significant differences in strain nodule occupancy were not detected on either cowpea or peanut. In contrast, nodule occupancy in loamy sand from Good Hope, Botswana, inoculated at a 40:1 inoculant to soil bradyrhizobia ratio, was 22.4% on cowpea and only 6.8% on peanut. In Good Hope soil, strain CB756 was the weakest competitor on cowpea but strain differences were insignificant on peanut. Whereas the Good Hope soil population was effective on cowpea, it was ineffective on peanut. DNA fingerprinting showed that isolates from Gaborone, Francistown and Roodeplaat contained several different genotypes, whereas those from Good Hope, Rasesa and Maun were more homogeneous. The dominance at Good Hope of genotypes effective on cowpea but ineffective on peanut emphasises the value of assessing the symbiotic capabilities and structures of indigenous populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beattie GA, Clayton MK, Handelsman J (1989) Quantitative comparison of the laboratory and field competitiveness of Rhizobium leguminasarum biovar phaseoli. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:2755–2761

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg RK, Lonachan TE, Zablotowicz RM, Lieberman MT (1988) Nodule occupancy by introduced Bradyrhizobium japonicum in Iowa soils. Agron J 80:876–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloem JF, Law IJ (2001) Determination of competitive abilities of Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains in soils from soybean production regions in South Africa. Biol Fertil Soils 33:181–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloem JF, Botha WJ, Law IJ, Steyn PL (2002) Colony variation in Sinorhizobium meliloti inoculant strain U 45. Microbiol Res 157:283–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Botha WJ, Bloem JF, Law IJ (2002) Bradyrhizobium sp. (Lupinus) in the winter rainfall region of South Africa. Biol Fertil Soils 36:335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botha WJ, Jaftha JB, Bloem JF, Habig JH, Law IJ (2004) Effect of soil bradyrhizobia on the success of soybean inoculant strain CB 1809. Microbiol Res 159:219–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brockwell J, Bottomley PJ, Thies JE (1995) Manipulation of rhizobia microflora for improving legume productivity and soil fertility: a critical assessment. Plant Soil 174:143–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bushby HVA (1984) Colonization of rhizospheres and nodulation of two Vigna species by rhizobia inoculated onto seed: influence of soil. Soil Biol Biochem 16:635–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Price B (1977) Regression analysis by example. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakora FD, Keya SO (1997) Contribution of legume nitrogen fixation to sustainable agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Soil Biol Biochem 29:809–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danso SKA, Owiredu JD (1988) Competitiveness of introduced and indigenous cowpea Bradyrhizobium strains for nodule formation on cowpeas [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.] in three soils. Soil Biol Biochem 20:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison RF, Kiers ET (2004) Lifestyle alternatives for rhizobia: mutualism, parasitism, and forgoing symbiosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 237:187–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denison RF, Kiers ET (2004) Lifestyle alternatives for rhizobia: mutualism, parasitism, and forgoing symbiosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 237:187–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fening JO, Danso SKA (2001) Response of cowpea to inoculation with indigenous Bradyrhizobium strains. Trop Sci 41:172–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham PH, Vance CP (2003) Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol 131:872–877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SS, Panchapakesan S (1979) Multiple decision procedures: theory and methodology of selecting and ranking populations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishinevsky B, Maoz A (1983) ELISA identification of Rhizobium strains by use of enzyme-labelled protein A. Curr Microbiol 9:45–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kishinevsky B, Strijdom BW, Otto CJ, Lochner HH, Kriel MM (1987) Response to inoculation of groundnuts grown under irrigation in soil containing indigenous rhizobia. S Afr J Plant Soil 4:75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Law IJ, Strijdom BW (1974) Nitrogen-fixing and competitive abilities of a Rhizobium strain used in inoculants for Arachis hypogaea. Phytophylactica 6:221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathis JN, McMillin DE (1996) Detection of genetic variation in Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 variants using DNA fingerprints generated with GC rich arbitrary PCR primers. Plant Soil 186:81–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McInnes A, Thies JE, Abbott LK, Howieson JG (2004) Structure and diversity among rhizobial strains, populations and communities—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1295–1308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mpepereki S, Wollum AG, Makonese F (1996) Diversity in symbiotic specificity of cowpea rhizobia indigenous to Zimbabwean soils. Plant Soil 186:167–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niemann S, Pühler A, Tichy H-V, Simon R, Selbitschka W (1997) Evaluation of the resolving power of three different DNA fingerprinting methods to discriminate among isolates of a natural Rhizobium meliloti population. J Appl Microbiol 82:477–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AE, Viccars LA, Watson JM, Gibson AH (1995) Differentiation of Rhizobium strains using the polymerase chain reaction with random and directed primers. Soil Biol Biochem 27:515–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sen D, Weaver RW, Bal AK (1986) Structure and organization of effective peanut and cowpea root nodules induced by rhizobial strain 32H1. J Exp Bot 37:356–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sessitch A, Jjemba PK, Hardarson G, Akkermans ADL, Wilson KJ (1997) Measurement of the competitive index of Rhizobium tropici strain CIAT899 derivatives marked with the gusA gene. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1099–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staphorst JL, Strijdom BW, Otto JF (1975) Nitrogen-fixing ability of rhizobia which nodulate groundnuts in South African soils. Phytophylactica 7:133–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1960) Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw–Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijdom BW (1998) South African studies on biological nitrogen-fixing systems and the exploitation of the nodule bacterium-legume symbiosis. S Afr J Sci 94:11–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strijdom BW, Otto CJ, Lochner HH (1988) Effects of inoculant strains applied over two seasons on nodulation of groundnuts by indigenous rhizobia. S Afr J Sci 84:115–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Thies JR, Bohlool BB, Singleton PW (1991a) Influence of the size of indigenous rhizobial populations on establishment and symbiotic performance of introduced rhizobia on field-grown legumes. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:19–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thies JR, Bohlool BB, Singleton PW (1991b) Subgroups of the cowpea miscellany: symbiotic specificity within Bradyrhizobium spp. for Vigna unguiculata, Phaseolus lunatus, Arachis hypogaea, and Macroptilium atropurpureum. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:1540–1545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thies JE, Woomer PL, Singleton PW (1995) Enrichment of Bradyrhizobium spp populations in soil due to cropping of the homologous host legume. Soil Biol Biochem 27:633–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thies JE, Holmes EM, Vachot A (2001) Application of molecular techniques to studies in Rhizobium ecology: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 41:299–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urtz BE, Elkan GH (1996) Genetic diversity among Bradyrhizobium isolates that effectively nodulate peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Can J Microbiol 42:1121–1130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Merwe SP, Strijdom BW, Uys CJ (1974) Groundnut response to seed inoculation under extensive agricultural practices in South African soils. Phytophylactica 6:295–302

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kessel C, Hartley C (2000) Agricultural management of grain legumes: has it led to an increase in nitrogen fixation? Field Crops Res 65:165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent JM (1970) A manual for the practical study of root-nodule bacteria, I.B.P. Handbook No. 15. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinuesa P, Silva C, Werner D, Martínez-Romero E (2005) Population genetics and phylogenetic inference in bacterial molecular systematics: the role of migration and recombination in Bradyrhizobium species cohesion and delineation. Mol Phylogenet Evol 34:29–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver RW, Frederick LR (1974) Effect of inoculum rate on competitive nodulation of Glycine max L. Merrill. I Greenhouse studies. Agron J 66:229–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KJ (1996) GusA as a marker gene to track microbes. In: Ackermans ADL, van Elsas JD, de Bruijn F-J (eds) Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual 6.1.5. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Woomer P, Bennet J, Yost R (1990) Overcoming the inflexibility of most-probable-number procedures. Agron J 82:349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the staff of the Department of Agricultural Research, Botswana for their help and support. South African researchers were funded through the National Research Foundation by a grant from the Regional S&T Programme of the South African Department of Science and Technology. The excellent technical assistance of Martie M. Kriel is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian J. Law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Law, I.J., Botha, W.F., Majaule, U.C. et al. Symbiotic and genomic diversity of ‘cowpea’ bradyrhizobia from soils in Botswana and South Africa. Biol Fertil Soils 43, 653–663 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-006-0145-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-006-0145-y

Keywords

Navigation