Abstract
We adapted a direct count method for obtaining counts of active protozoa that was not overly time consuming. Soil samples from an agricultural field were examined at 1- to 3-day intervals three times through the year. The three sampling periods represented different weather conditions. At each sampling event, fresh soil samples were extracted upon return to the laboratory for protozoa. These were enumerated at the microscope without prior culture, in soil–water suspension dilutions. We describe a procedure that allowed all samples to be processed in a few hours. Our results suggest there is good reproducibility and agreement between samples collected on the same day. Our data resolve differences between days as soil conditions changed slowly with drying or wetting. This procedure is suitable for describing species active at the time of sampling. Unlike the ‘most probable number’ procedure that relies on cultivable species, it is less prone to enumerating excysting individuals, and it provides better resolution between sampling dates, with a relatively low number of samples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Adl MS (2003) The ecology of soil decomposition. CABI, Wallingford, UK, p 335
Adl MS, Acosta-Mercado D, Anderson T, Lynn DH (2005) Protozoa. In: Carter M (ed) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn. Canadian Soil Science Society, CRC Press, in press
Aescht E, Foissner W (1992) Effects of mineral and organic fertilizers on the microfauna in a high altitude reforestation trial. Biol Fertil Soils 13:17–23
Berthold A, Palzenberger M (1995) Comparison between direct counts of active soil ciliates and most probable number estimates obtained by Singh's dilution culture method. Biol Fertil Soils 19:348–356
Coleman DC, Blair JM, Elliott ET, Wall DH (1999) Soil invertebrates. In: Robertson GP et al (eds) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 349–377
Elliott ET, Coleman DC (1977) Soil protozoa dynamics in a shortgrass prairie. Soil Biol Biochem 9:113–118
Foissner W (1987) Soil protozoa: fundamental problems, ecological significance, adaptations in ciliates and testacean, bioindicators and guide to the literature. In: Corliss JO, Patterson DJ (eds) Prog Protistol, vol 2. Biopress, Bristol, UK, pp 69–212
Lüftenagger G, Petz W, Foissner W, Adam H (1988) The efficiency of a direct counting method in estimating the number of microscopic soil organisms. Pedobiologia 31:95–101
Paul EA, Harris D, Klug MJ, Ruess RG (1999) The determination of microbial biomass. In: Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P (eds) Standard soil methods for long term ecological research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 291–317
Acknowledgements
SMA was supported by NSERC-Canada. The Horseshoe Bend field site was maintained with a grant from NSF-LTREB to P. Hendrix (Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia). We thank the staff of the Horseshoe Bend project for access to field data and archives.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adl, S.M., Coleman, D.C. Dynamics of soil protozoa using a direct count method. Biol Fertil Soils 42, 168–171 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-005-0009-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-005-0009-x