Skip to main content
Log in

Nucleoli as maximizers of collective satisfaction functions

  • Article
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Two preimputations of a given TU game can be compared via the Lorenz order applied to the vectors of satisfactions. One preimputation is `socially more desirable' than the other, if its corresponding vector of satisfactions Lorenz dominates the satisfaction vector with respect to the second preimputation. It is shown that the prenucleolus, the anti-prenucleolus, and the modified nucleolus are maximal in this Lorenz order. Here the modified nucleolus is the unique preimputation which lexicographically minimizes the envies between the coalitions, i.e. the differences of excesses. Recently Sudhölter developed this solution concept. Properties of the set of all undominated preimputations, the maximal satisfaction solution, are discussed. A function on the set of preimputations is called collective satisfaction function if it respects the Lorenz order. We prove that both classical nucleoli are unique minimizers of certain `weighted Gini inequality indices', which are derived from some collective satisfaction functions. For the (pre)nucleolus the function proposed by Kohlberg, who characterized the nucleolus as a solution of a single minimization problem, can be chosen. Finally, a collective satisfaction function is defined such that the modified nucleolus is its unique maximizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 18 October 1996 / Accepted: 31 January 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sudhölter, P., Peleg, B. Nucleoli as maximizers of collective satisfaction functions. Soc Choice Welfare 15, 383–411 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050113

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050113

Keywords

Navigation