Skip to main content
Log in

Development and validation of echo PIV

  • Original
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The combination of ultrasound echo images with digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) methods has resulted in a two-dimensional, two-component velocity field measurement technique appropriate for opaque flow conditions including blood flow in clinical applications. Advanced PIV processing algorithms including an iterative scheme and window offsetting were used to increase the spatial resolution of the velocity measurement to a maximum of 1.8 mm×3.1 mm. Velocity validation tests in fully developed laminar pipe flow showed good agreement with both optical PIV measurements and the expected parabolic profile. A dynamic range of 1 to 60 cm/s has been obtained to date.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrian RJ (1991) Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 23:261–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson P, Woodcock JP (1982) Doppler ultrasound and its use in clinical measurement. Academic, New York

  • Bamber J, Hasan P, Cook-Martin J, Rubim JM (1988) Parametric imaging of tissue shear and flow using B-scan decorrelation rate. J Ultrasound Med 7:s135

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohs LN, Friemel BH, McDermott BA, Trahey GE (1993) A real time system for quantifying and displaying two-dimensional velocities using ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 19:751–761

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohs LN, Friemel BH, Trahey GE (1995) Experimental velocity profiles and volumetric flow via two-dimensional speckle tracking. Ultrasound Med Biol 21:885–898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohs LN, Geiman BJ, Anderson ME, Gebhart SC, Trahey GE (2000) Speckle tracking for multi-dimensional flow estimation. Ultrasonics 38:369–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crapper M, Bruce T, Gouble C (2000) Flow field visualization of sediment-laden flow using ultrasonic imaging. Dyn Atmos Oceans 31:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillinger MF, Schwartz RA (1993) Volumetric blood flow measurement with color Doppler ultrasonography: the importance of visual clues. J Ultrasound Med 3:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg F, Merton DA, Liu JB, Needleman L, Goldberg BB (1998) Clinical applications of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics 36:695–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill RW (1985) Measurement of blood flow by ultrasound: accuracy and sources of error. Ultrasound Med Biol 11:625–641

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart DP (1999) Super-resolution PIV by recursive local-correlation. J Visualiz 10:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane RD, Adrian RJ (1990) Optimization of particle image velocimeters. Meas Sci Tech 2:1202–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremkau FW (1989) Diagnostic ultrasound. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

  • Leen E (2001) Ultrasound contrast harmonic imaging of abdominal organs. Seminars Ultrasound CT MRI 22:11–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto K (1999) Checker board cross-correlation technique for PIV. In: Proc Of PSFVIP-2, Honolulu, no. PF116

  • Podell S, Burrascano C, Gaal M, Golec B, Maniquis J, Mehlhaff P (1999) Physical and biochemical stability of Optison, an injectable ultrasound contrast agent. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 30:213–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin JM, Fowlkes JB, Tuthill TA, Moskalik AP, Rhee RT, Adler RS, Kazanjian SN, Carson PL (1999) Speckle decorrelation flow measurement with B-mode US of contrast agent flow in a phantom and in rabbit kidney. Radiology 213:429–437

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandrin L, Manneville S, Fink M (2001) Ultrafast two-dimensional ultrasonic speckle velocimetry: a tool in flow imaging. Appl Phys Lett 78:1155–1157

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M (2000) Design of an ultrasound contrast agent for myocardial perfusion. Echocardiography 17:s11–s16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tio KK, Linan A, Lasheras JC, Ganan-Calvo AM (1993) On the dynamics of buoyant and heavy particles in a periodic Stuart vortex flow. J Fluid Mech 254:671–699

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlendorf V, Scholle F, Reinhardt M (2000) Acoustic behavior of current ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics 38:81–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westerweel J (1993) Digital particle image velocimetry—theory and application. Dissertation, Delft University, The Netherlands

  • Westerweel J, Dabiri D, Gharib M (1997) The effect of a discrete window offset on the accuracy of cross-correlation analysis of digital PIV recordings. Exp Fluids 23:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willert CE, Gharib M (1991) Digital particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 10:181–193

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was made possible in part by grants from the American Heart Association (Desert-Mountain Affiliate), National Science Foundation (EECS-0225405) and NIH (HL 67393, HL 072738). One of the authors (HB Kim) was supported by the post-doctoral fellowship program of the Korean Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF). We would also like to thank Craig Lanning and Scott Kirby for their technical assistance with the experimental apparatus and ultrasound system.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Hertzberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, H.B., Hertzberg, J.R. & Shandas, R. Development and validation of echo PIV. Exp Fluids 36, 455–462 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-003-0743-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-003-0743-5

Keywords

Navigation