Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trübung hinter der Intraokularlinse – aber kein typischer Nachstar?

Opacification posterior to the intraocular lens – but no typical secondary cataract?

  • Bild und Fall
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Giers BCKR, Tandogan T, Auffarth GU (2017) Liquefied aftercataract mimicking IOL-opacification. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 234(8):988–990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Werner L, Apple DJ, Escobar-Gomez M, Ohrstrom A, Crayford BB, Bianchi R, Pandey SK (2000) Postoperative deposition of calcium on the surfaces of a hydrogel intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 107(12):2179–2185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neuhann IM, Werner L, Izak AM, Pandey SK, Kleinmann G, Mamalis N, Neuhann TF, Apple DJ (2004) Late postoperative opacification of a hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel) intraocular lens: a clinicopathological analysis of 106 explants. Ophthalmology 111(11):2094–2101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tandogan T, Khoramnia R, Choi CY, Scheuerle A, Wenzel M, Hugger P, Auffarth GU (2015) Optical and material analysis of opacified hydrophilic intraocular lenses after explantation: a laboratory study. BMC Ophthalmol 15:170

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Neuhann IM, Kleinmann G, Apple DJ (2008) A new classification of calcification of intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 115(1):73–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitäts-Augenklinik Tübingen, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Str. 7, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland

    E.-M. Konrad & F. Gelisken

  2. MVZ Prof. Neuhann, München, Deutschland

    I. Neuhann

Authors
  1. E.-M. Konrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Neuhann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Gelisken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E.-M. Konrad.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

E.-M. Konrad, I. Neuhann und F. Gelisken geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren. Alle Patienten, die über Bildmaterial oder anderweitige Angaben innerhalb des Manuskripts zu identifizieren sind, haben hierzu ihre schriftliche Einwilligung gegeben.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konrad, EM., Neuhann, I. & Gelisken, F. Trübung hinter der Intraokularlinse – aber kein typischer Nachstar?. Ophthalmologe 115, 326–328 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-017-0567-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-017-0567-y

Search

Navigation