Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of phone counseling on urinary stone prevention

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We compared the effect of standard office-based consultation (OC) and phone correspondences (PC) on dietary 24-h urinary parameters.

Methods

The medical record of all patients treated between January and April 2019 was reviewed. Only patients who had at least two consecutive 24-h urine collections were included. Linear and logistic regressions were used to investigate the difference between the changes in urinary parameters after OC and PC.

Results

Forty-three patients underwent 135 OC and 34 PC. Twenty-one received OC and PC, and 22 had only OC. Gender, age, the distance to stone clinic, the number of previous stone episodes, and baseline urinary parameters were similar between the groups. Patients who had both OC and PC had a longer follow-up time (51.7 vs 18.5 months, p < 0.0001) as well as more consults (Median 5.4 vs 2.5, p < 0.0001). Six (27%) patients who had only OC, and eight (38%) patients who had both OC and PC, experienced stone recurrence during the study period (p = 0.52). Following PC, there was a greater improvement in urine volume in comparison to OC (0.27 l/day vs -0.06 l/day, p = 0.034), but there was no difference in the absolute values after the consults between the groups.

Conclusion

In established stone-clinic patients, PC was associated with a better adherence with follow-up. The 24-h urine results were similar between PC and OC. PC may be an effective alternative for urinary stone management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson CM, Wilson DM, O’Fallon WM, Malek RS, Kurland LT (1979) Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester. Minnesota Kidney Int 16(5):624–631. https://doi.org/10.1038/KI.1979.173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saigal C, Joyce G, international AT-K 2005‏ undefined. Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management?‏. Elsevier‏. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S008525381551034X. Accessed 3 Sep 2019.

  3. Barcelo P, Wuhl O, Servitge E, … AR-TJ of, 1993 undefined. Randomized double-blind study of potassium citrate in idiopathic hypocitraturic calcium nephrolithiasis. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534717358883. Accessed 3 Sep 2019.

  4. Ettinger B, Tang A, Citron JT, Livermore B, Williams T (1986) Randomized trial of allopurinol in the prevention of calcium oxalate calculi. N Engl J Med 315(22):1386–1389. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198611273152204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. LÆRUM E, Scandinavica SL-A medica, 1984 undefined. Thiazide prophylaxis of urolithiasis: a double‐blind study in general practice. Wiley Online Libr. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1984.tb05023.x. Accessed 3 Sep 2019.

  6. Lotan Y, Buendia Jiménez I, Lenoir-Wijnkoop I et al (2012) Primary prevention of nephrolithiasis is cost-effective for a national healthcare system. BJU Int 110(11c):E1060–E1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11212.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Whited JD, Datta S, Hall RP et al (2003) An economic analysis of a store and forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J e-Health 9(4):351–360. https://doi.org/10.1089/153056203772744671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kobayashi H, Sado T (2019) Satisfaction of a new telephone consultation service for prenatal and postnatal health care. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 45(7):1376–1381. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Narang GL, Wiener LE, Penniston KL et al (2019) The effect of travel distance on health-related quality of life for patients with nephrolithiasis. Can Urol Assoc J. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.6090

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Borghi L, Meschi T, Schianchi T et al (1999) Urine volume: stone risk factor and preventive measure. Nephron 81(1):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1159/000046296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borghi L, Meschi T, Amato F, Briganti A, Novarini A, Giannini A (1996) Urinary volume, water and recurrences in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a 5-year randomized prospective study. J Urol 155(3):839–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66321-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu C, Zhang C, Wang XL et al (2015) Self-fluid management in prevention of kidney stones: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. Med (United States) 94(27):e1042. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR (2005) Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 68(4):1808–1814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lotan Y, Pearle MS (2011) Cost-effectiveness of primary prevention strategies for nephrolithiasis. J Urol 186(2):550–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AN: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing. KS: project development, manuscript editing. JM: manuscript editing. MT: statistical analysis, manuscript editing. MH: project development, manuscript editing. MK: protocol development, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amihay Nevo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

The study was approved by the local ethic comitee (IRB #19–005577).

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nevo, A., Stern, K.L., Moore, J.P. et al. The impact of phone counseling on urinary stone prevention. World J Urol 39, 1625–1629 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03320-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03320-x

Keywords

Navigation