Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of laser fiber tip cleavage on power output for ureteroscopy and stone treatment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Holmium:YAG laser is the most used laser for urolithiasis. Generally, we use metallic scissors to cut the fiber tip to restore its effectiveness. Many cleaving methods have been described to avoid fiber damage and to restore its greatest power to the fiber. There is a lack of information regarding which cleaving method should be used and its effect on the fiber. In order to compare these effects, we studied different cleavage methods in terms of power output and its effects on the fiber.

Methods

New single-use 272-μm fibers were used with a holmium:YAG laser lithotripter. Five kinds of fiber tips were compared: a new intact fiber, cleaved with ceramic scissors, cleaved with metallic scissors, first cleaved then stripped and first stripped then cleaved. The fibers were used against synthetic stones (BegoStone®) similar to calcium oxalate monohydrate, with fragmentation (SP, 5 Hz, 1.5 J) and dusting (LP, 15 Hz, 0.5 J) settings. We measured power output at 0, 1, 5, 10 and 15 min.

Results

For fragmentation parameters, there was a statistical difference between the 5 groups at 0 and 1 min of laser use (p < 0.05) and none for time period over 1 min (p = 0.077–0.658). For dusting parameters, there was a statistical difference between the 5 groups at 0 min of laser use (p < 0.05) and none for time period over 0 min (p = 0.064–1).

Conclusion

Cleaving the fiber tip may restore its effectiveness to the fiber, but only for a limited time, although it may preserve the scopes from damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2014) Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers. World J Urol 33(4):463–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vicente Rodríguez J, Fernández González I, Hernández Fernández C, Santos García-Vaquero I, Rosales Bordes A (2006) Lasers in urology. Actas Urol Esp 30(9):879–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mues AC, Teichman JMH, Knudsen BE (2009) Quantification of holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet optical tip degradation. J Endourol Endourol Soc 23(9):1425–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khemees TA, Shore DM, Antiporda M, Teichman JMH, Knudsen BE (2013) Evaluation of a new 240-μm single-use holmium:YAG optical fiber for flexible ureteroscopy. J Endourol 27(4):475–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2015) Are we all doing it wrong? Influence of stripping and cleaving methods of laser fibers on laser lithotripsy performance. J Urol 193(3):1030–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peplinski B, Faaborg D, Miao E, Alsyouf M, Myklak K, Kelln W et al (2016) The effect of laser fiber cleave technique and lithotripsy time on power output. J Endourol 30(6):678–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Esch E, Simmons WN, Sankin G, Cocks HF, Preminger GM, Zhong P (2010) A simple method for fabricating artificial kidney stones of different physical properties. Urol Res 38(4):315–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yunbo Liu PZ (2002) BegoStone—a new stone phantom for shock wave lithotripsy research (L). J Acoust Soc Am 112(4):1265–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sea J, Jonat LM, Chew BH, Qiu J, Wang B, Hoopman J et al (2012) Optimal power settings for Holmium:YAG lithotripsy. J Urol 187(3):914–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2014) In vitro fragmentation efficiency of holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy—a comprehensive study encompassing different frequencies, pulse energies, total power levels and laser fibre diameters. BJU Int 114(2):261–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Giusti G, Proietti S, Villa L, Cloutier J, Rosso M, Gadda GM et al (2016) Current standard technique for modern flexible ureteroscopy: tips and tricks. Eur Urol 70(1):188–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vassantachart JM, Lightfoot M, Yeo A, Maldonado J, Li R, Alsyouf M et al (2015) Laser fiber cleaving techniques: effects on tip morphology and power output. J Endourol Endourol Soc 29(1):84–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. From Cook Medical”Fiber cleaving tool” brochure. Visited on July 2016 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cookmedical.com/data/IFU_PDF/T_FCT_REV2.PDF

  14. Mues AC, Teichman JMH, Knudsen BE (2009) Evaluation of 24 Holmium:YAG laser optical fibers for flexible ureteroscopy. J Urol 182(1):348–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Akar EC, Knudsen BE (2015) Evaluation of 16 new holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser optical fibers for ureteroscopy. Urology 86(2):230–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Mattieu Haddad is supported by the AFU scholarship from the French Association of Urology. Esteban Emiliani is supported by the EUSP scholarship program from the European Association of Urology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Protocol/project development was by M. Haddad and O. Traxer. Data collection or management was by M. Haddad Y. Rouchausse, F. Coste and L. Berthe. Data analysis was done by M. Haddad and S. Buttice. Manuscript writing/editing was by M. Haddad, E. Emiliani, S. Doizi and B. Somani.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Traxer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Prof. O. Traxer is a consultant for Olympus, Rocamed, Coloplast and Boston Scientific. The rest of the authors declare that they do not have conflicts of interest.

Funding

None.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haddad, M., Emiliani, E., Rouchausse, Y. et al. Impact of laser fiber tip cleavage on power output for ureteroscopy and stone treatment. World J Urol 35, 1765–1770 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2053-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2053-1

Keywords

Navigation