Skip to main content
Log in

Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors larger than 7 cm: a single-center experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare perioperative outcomes between robotic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy for localized >7 cm tumors.

Methods

We identified patients in our institutional review boards approved database who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy or open partial nephrectomy for treatment of renal tumors >7 cm in size between January 2009 and August 2015. The operative–postoperative outcomes and complications were compared between groups.

Results

The number of patients with >7 cm renal tumors treated at our center with robotic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy were 54 and 56, respectively. Patients’ demographics and tumor characteristics were similar between groups. Likewise, there were no significant difference between the groups in duration of operation, positive surgical margin rates and incidence of malignant disease rates. Median ischemia time was lower in robotic partial nephrectomy group (31.5 vs. 35 min., p = 0.02). Patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy had significantly lower intraoperative blood transfusion rates (9.4 vs. 30.4 %, p = 0.008) and shorter length of hospital stay (3.5 vs. 5.3 days, p < 0.001). The incidence of overall complications (robotic arm, 18.5 % vs. open arm, 28.6 %, p = 0.26) and major complications (robotic arm, 3.7 % vs. open arm, 12.5 %, p = 0.16) was comparable between the two groups. The readmission rate within 30-days after discharge was higher in open partial nephrectomy group (p = 0.03). There was no difference in the median percentage estimated glomerular filtration rate preservation and chronic kidney disease upstaging between groups.

Conclusions

Localized renal tumors >7 cm and amenable to partial nephrectomy can be considered suitable for robotic approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, Dabestani S, Hofmann F, Hora M et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67:913–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, Blute ML, Chow GK, Derweesh IH et al (2009) Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 182:1271–1279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, Snyder M, Vickers AJ, Raj GV et al (2006) Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 7:735–740

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark AT, Breau RH, Morash C, Fergusson D, Doucette S, Cagiannos I (2008) Preservation of renal function following partial or radical nephrectomy using 24-h creatinine clearance. Eur Urol 54:143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker F, Roos FC, Janssen M, Brenner W, Hampel C, Siemer S et al (2011) Short-term functional and oncologic outcomes of nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumours ≥7 cm. Eur Urol 59:931–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Breau RH, Crispen PL, Jimenez RE, Lohse CM, Blute ML, Leibovich BC (2010) Outcome of stage T2 or greater renal cell cancer treated with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 183:903–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karellas ME, O’Brien MF, Jang TL, Bernstein M, Russo P (2010) Partial nephrectomy for selected renal cortical tumours of ≥7 cm. BJU Int 106:1484–1487

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kopp RP, Liss MA, Mehrazin R, Wang S, Lee HJ, Jabaji R et al (2015) Analysis of renal functional outcomes after radical or partial nephrectomy for renal masses ≥7 cm using the RENAL score. Urology 86:312–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Long CJ, Canter DJ, Kutikov A, Li T, Simhan J, Smaldone M et al (2012) Partial nephrectomy for renal masses ≥7 cm: technical, oncological and functional outcomes. BJU Int 109:1450–1456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peycelon M, Hupertan V, Comperat E, Renard-Penna R, Vaessen C, Conort P et al (2009) Long-term outcomes after nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm. J Urol 181:35–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta GN, Boris R, Chung P, Linehan WM, Pinto PA, Bratslavsky G (2013) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors greater than 4 cm and high nephrometry score: feasibility, renal functional, and oncological outcomes with minimum 1 year follow-up. Urol Oncol 31:51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Porter MP, Lin DW (2007) Trends in renal cancer surgery and patient provider characteristics associated with partial nephrectomy in the United States. Urol Oncol 25:298–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lane BR, Gill IS (2010) 7-year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol 183:473–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morris DS, Miller DC, Hollingsworth JM, Dunn RL, Roberts WW, Wolf JS, Jr., et al (2007) Differential adoption of laparoscopy by treatment indication. J Urol 178:2109–2113; discussion 13

  15. Sivarajan G, Taksler GB, Walter D, Gross CP, Sosa RE, Makarov DV (2015) The effect of the diffusion of the surgical robot on the hospital-level utilization of partial nephrectomy. Med Care 53:71–78

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brandao LF, Zargar H, Autorino R, Akca O, Laydner H, Samarasekera D et al (2014) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for ≥7 cm renal masses: a comparative outcome analysis. Urology 84:602–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel HD, Mullins JK, Pierorazio PM, Jayram G, Cohen JE, Matlaga BR et al (2013) Trends in renal surgery: robotic technology is associated with increased use of partial nephrectomy. J Urol 189:1229–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miyake H, Hinata N, Imai S, Furukawa J, Tanaka K, Fujisawa M (2015) Partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors: comparison of conventional open and robot-assisted approaches. Int J Clin Oncol 20:808–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaouk JH, Khalifeh A, Hillyer S, Haber GP, Stein RJ, Autorino R (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: step-by-step contemporary technique and surgical outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Eur Urol 62:553–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Campbell SC, Novick AC (1995) Surgical technique and morbidity of elective partial nephrectomy. Semin Urol Oncol 13:281–287

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramirez D, Caputo PA, Krishnan J, Zargar H, Kaouk JH (2016) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with intracorporeal renal hypothermia using ice slush: step-by-step technique and matched comparison with warm ischaemia. BJU Int 117:531–536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 130:461–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW et al (2003) National kidney foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med 139:137–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kutikov A, Smaldone MC, Egleston BL, Manley BJ, Canter DJ, Simhan J et al (2011) Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high-grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the RENAL nephrometry score. Eur Urol 60:241–248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Donat SM, Diaz M, Bishoff JT, Coleman JA, Dahm P, Derweesh IH et al (2013) Follow-up for clinically localized renal neoplasms: AUA guideline. J Urol 190:407–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alanee S, Herberts M, Holland B, Dynda D (2016) Contemporary experience with partial nephrectomy for stage T2 or greater renal tumors. Curr Urol Rep 17:5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McCullough TC, Roth JV, Ginsberg PC, Harkaway RC (2004) Estimated blood loss underestimates calculated blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Int 72:13–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ko KJ, Choi DK, Shin SJ, Ryoo HS, Kim TS, Song W et al (2015) Predictive factors of prolonged warm ischemic time (≥30 min) during partial nephrectomy under pneumoperitoneum. Korean J Urol 56:742–748

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contribution

E Malkoc was involved in project development, manuscript writing, data management and data collection. D. Ramirez was involved in project development, data collection and manuscript editing. O. Kara was involved in data analysis, data collection and manuscript editing. MJ. Maurice was involved in data collection. RJ. Nelson was involved in data collection. PA. Caputo was involved in data collection. J. Kaouk was involved in project development, data management and manuscript editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jihad H. Kaouk.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Jihad H. Kaouk is a consultant for Endocare. No competing financial interests exist for the other authors.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study had previously.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malkoc, E., Ramirez, D., Kara, O. et al. Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors larger than 7 cm: a single-center experience. World J Urol 35, 781–787 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1937-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1937-9

Keywords

Navigation