Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative evaluation of electrodes for external urethral sphincter electromyography during bladder-to-urethral guarding reflex

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Accuracy in the recording of external urethral sphincter (EUS) electromyography (EMG) is an important goal in the quantitative evaluation of urethral function. The aim of this study was to quantitatively compare electrode recordings taken during tonic activity and leak point pressure (LPP) testing.

Methods

Several electrodes, including the surface electrode (SE), concentric electrode (CE), and wire electrode (WE), were placed on the EUS singly and simultaneously in six female Sprague-Dawley rats under urethane anesthesia. The bladder was filled via a retropubic catheter while LPP testing and EUS EMG recording were done. Quantitative baseline correction of the EUS EMG signal was performed to reduce baseline variation. Amplitude and frequency of 1-s samples of the EUS EMG signal were measured before LPP (tonic activity) and during peak LPP activity.

Results

The SE, CE, and WE signals demonstrated tonic activity before LPP and an increase in activity during LPP, suggesting that the electrodes accurately recorded EUS activity during tonic activity and during the bladder-to-EUS guarding reflex, regardless of the size or location of detection areas. SE recordings required significantly less baseline correction than both CE and WE recordings. The activity in CE-recorded EMG was significantly higher than that of the SE and WE both in single and simultaneous recordings.

Conclusions

These electrodes may be suitable for testing EUS EMG activity. The SE signal had significantly less baseline variation and the CE detected local activity more sensitively than the other electrodes, which may provide insight into choosing an appropriate electrode for EUS EMG recording.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradley CS, Smith KE, Kreder KJ (2008) Urodynamic evaluation of the bladder and pelvic floor. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 37(3):539–552 vii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Podnar S (2007) Neurophysiology of the neurogenic lower urinary tract disorders. Clin Neurophysiol 118(7):1423–1437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mokhless I, Gaafar S, Fouda K, Shafik M, Assem A (2006) Botulinum A toxin urethral sphincter injection in children with nonneurogenic neurogenic bladder. J Urol 176(4 Pt 2):1767–1770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartkowski DP, Doubrava RG (2004) Ability of a normal dysfunctional voiding symptom score to predict uroflowmetry and external urinary sphincter electromyography patterns in children. J Urol 172(5 Pt 1):1980–1985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koff SA, Diokno AC, Lapides J (1979) Neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Am Fam Physician 19(2):100–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadoughi N, Bush IM (1974) Neuromuscular dysfunctions of the external urinary sphincter. IMJ Ill Med J 145(6):497–499

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thor KB, Katofiasc MA, Danuser H, Springer J, Schaus JM (2002) The role of 5-HT(1A) receptors in control of lower urinary tract function in cats. Brain Res 946(2):290–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Damaser MS, Broxton-King C, Ferguson C, Kim FJ, Kerns JM (2003) Functional and neuroanatomical effects of vaginal distention and pudendal nerve crush in the female rat. J Urol 170(3):1027–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerns JM, Damaser MS, Kane JM et al (2000) Effects of pudendal nerve injury in the female rat. Neurourol Urodyn 19(1):53–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang HH, Gustilo-Ashby AM, Salcedo LB et al (2009) Electrophysiological function during voiding after simulated childbirth injuries. Exp Neurol 215(2):342–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang HH, Pan HQ, Gustilo-Ashby MA et al (2009) Dual simulated childbirth injuries result in slowed recovery of pudendal nerve and urethral function. Neurourol Urodyn 28(3):229–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang HY, Havton LA (2008) Differential effects of urethane and isoflurane on external urethral sphincter electromyography and cystometry in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 295(4):F1248–F1253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng CW, Chen JJ, Chang HY, de Groat WC, Cheng CL (2006) External urethral sphincter activity in a rat model of pudendal nerve injury. Neurourol Urodyn 25(4):388–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shoffstall AJ, Zaszczurynski PJ, Butler RS, Damaser MS (2008) Development of a device to standardize leak point pressure experiments in rats. Neurourol Urodyn 27(6):553–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Damaser MS, Kim FJ, Minetti GM (2003) Methods of testing urethral resistance in the female rat. Adv Exp Med Biol 539(Pt B):831–839

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ritter AB, Reisman S, Michniak BB (2005) Signal acquisition and processing. Biomedical engineering principles. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 265–289

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bennett BC, Kruse MN, Roppolo JR, Flood HD, Fraser M, de Groat WC (1995) Neural control of urethral outlet activity in vivo: role of nitric oxide. J Urol 153(6):2004–2009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kruse MN, Belton AL, de Groat WC (1993) Changes in bladder and external urethral sphincter function after spinal cord injury in the rat. Am J Physiol 264(6 Pt 2):R1157–R1163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Soto E, Vega R (1990) Teaching field potentials: a microcomputer simulation of the nerve action potential in a bidimensional conductor. Int J Biomed Comput 26(3):211–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. King JC, Dumitru D, Nandedkar S (1997) Concentric and single fiber electrode spatial recording characteristics. Muscle Nerve 20(12):1525–1533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NIH RO1 HD38679-08, the Cleveland Clinic, and The Rehabilitation Research and Development Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs (M. Damaser). H.-H. Jiang was supported by the Society for Urodynamics & Female Urology and the AUA Foundation Scholarship Program.

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai-Hong Jiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steward, J.E., Clemons, J.D., Zaszczurynski, P.J. et al. Quantitative evaluation of electrodes for external urethral sphincter electromyography during bladder-to-urethral guarding reflex. World J Urol 28, 365–371 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0463-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0463-4

Keywords

Navigation