Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of marine diatoms using pigment ratio suites

  • Chemistry
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diatoms are widely distributed in many temperate areas and some species frequently form extensive blooms in spring. Hence, monitoring the variations of specific genera or species of diatoms is necessary for studying phytoplankton population dynamics in marine ecosystems. To test whether pigment ratios can be used to identify diatoms at a below-class taxonomic level, we analyzed 14 species/strains of diatoms isolated from Chinese seas using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). We normalized all pigment concentrations to total chlorophyll a to calculate the ratios of pigment to chlorophyll a, and calculated the ratios between accessory pigments (or pigment sums). Cluster analysis indicated that these diatoms could be classified into four clusters in terms of three accessory pigment ratios: chlorophyll c 2: chlorophyll c 1, fucoxanthin:total chlorophyll c and diadinoxanthin:diatoxanthin. The classification results matched well with those of biological taxonomy. To test the stability of the classification, pigment data from one species, cultured under different light intensities, and five new species/strains were calculated and used for discriminant analysis. The results show that the classification of diatom species using pigment ratio suites was stable for the variations of pigment ratios of species cultured in different light intensities. The introduction of new species, however, may confuse the classification within the current scheme. Classification of marine diatoms using pigment ratio suites is potentially valuable for the fine chemotaxonomy of phytoplankton at taxonomic levels below class and would advance studies on phytoplankton population dynamics and marine ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Airs R L, Atkinson J E, Keely B J. 2001. Development and application of a high resolution liquid chromatographic method for the analysis of complex pigment distributions. J. Chromatogr. A, 917: 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Airs R L, Llewellyn C A. 2006. Improved detection and characterization of fucoxanthin-type carotenoids: novel pigments in Emiliania huxleyi (Prymnesiophyceae). J. Phycol., 42: 391–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bopp L, Aumont O, Cadule P, Alvain S, Gehlen M. 2005. Response of diatoms distribution to global warming and potential implications: a global model study. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32: L19606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng C M, Yao P, Liu S X, Yu Z G. 2010. Advances in pigment analysis and chemotaxonomy of marine phytoplankton. J. Ocean Univ. China, 40(4): 91–98. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiki T, Taguchi S. 2001. Relationship between light absorption and the xanthophyll-cycle pigments in marine diatoms. Plankton Biol. Ecol., 48: 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goericke R, Montoya J P. 1998. Estimating the contribution of microalgal taxa to chlorophyll a in the field-variations of pigment ratios under nutrient- and light-limited growth. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 169: 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havskum H, Schluter L, Scharek R, Berdalet E, Jacquet S. 2004. Routine quantification of phytoplankton groups-microscopy or pigment analyses? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 273: 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen P, Riemann B, Kaas H, Sørensen H M, Sørensen H L. 2002. Effects of nutrient-limitation and irradiance on marine phytoplankton pigments. J. Plankton Res., 24(9): 835–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou J J, Huang B Q, Cao Z R, Chen J X, Hong H S. 2007. Effects of nutrient limitation on pigments in Thalassiosira weissflogii and Prorocentrum donghaiense. J. Integr. Plant Biol., 49(5): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey S W, Mantoura R F C, Wright S W. 1997. Phytoplankton Pigments in Oceanography. UNESCO Publishing, Paris. 667p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey S W, Wright S W. 2006. Photosynthetic pigments in marine microalgae: insights from cultures and the sea. In: Subba Rao D V ed. Algal Cultures, Analogues of Blooms and Applications. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, USA. p.33–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey S W. 1972. Preparation and some properties of crystalline chlorophyll c 1 and c 2 from marine algae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 279: 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latasa M. 1995. Pigment composition of Heterocapsa sp. and Thalassiosira weissflogii growing in batch cultures under different irradiances. Sci. Mar., 59(1): 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latasa M. 2007. Improving estimations of phytoplankton class abundances using CHEMTAX. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 329: 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn A, Gibb S W. 2000. Intra-class variability in the carbon, pigment and biomineral content of prymnesiophytes and diatoms. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 193: 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey M D, Mackey D J, Higgins H W, Wright S W. 1996. CHEMTAX—a program for estimating class abundances from chemical markers: application to HPLC measurements of phytoplankton. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 144: 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Örnólfsdóttir E B, Pinckney J L, Tester P A. 2003. Quantification of the relative abundance of the toxic dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis (Dinophyta) using unique photopigments. J. Phycol., 39: 449–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez F, Chauton M, Johnsen G, Andresen K, Olsen LM, Zapata M. 2006. Photoacclimation in phytoplankton: implications for biomass estimates, pigment functionality and chemotaxonomy. Mar. Biol., 148(5): 963–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez J, Jiménez-Gómez F, Blanco J M, Figueroa F L. 2002. Physical gradients and spatial variability of the size structure and composition of phytoplankton in the Gerlache Strait (Antartica). Deep Sea Res. II, 49: 693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter L, Møhlenberg F, Havskum H, Larsen S. 2000. The use of phytoplankton pigments for identifying and quantifying phytoplankton groups in coastal areas: testing the influence of light and nutrients on pigment/chlorophyll a ratios. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 192: 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seoane S, Zapata M, Orive E. 2009. Growth rates and pigment patterns of haptophytes isolated from estuarine waters. J. Sea Res., 62: 286–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauber J L, Jeffrey S W. 1988. Photosynthetic pigments in 51 species of marine diatoms. J. Phycol., 24: 158–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struyf E, Smis A, Van Damme S, Meire P, Conley D J. 2009. The global biogeochemical silicon cycle. Silicon, 1(4): 207–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomas C. 1997. Identifying Marine Phytoplankton. Academic Press, San Diego, USA. 858p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich R M, Casper E T, Campbell L, Richardson B, Heil C A, Paul J H. 2010. Detection and quantification of Karenia mikimotoi using real-time nucleic acid sequencebased amplication with internal control RNA(ICNASBA). Harmful Algae, 9: 116–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D P. 1946. The triradiate and other forms of Nitzschia closterium (Ehrenberg) Wm. Smith, forma Minutissima of Allen and Nelson. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 26: 235–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S W, Jeffrey S W. 2006. Pigment markers for phytoplankton production. In: Volkman J K ed. Marine Organic Matter: Biomarkers, Isotopes and DNA. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Vol. 2, Part 2N. Springer Verlag, Basel. p.71–104.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yao P, Yu Z G, Deng C M, Liu S X, Zhen Y. 2010. Spatialtemporal distribution of phytoplankton pigments in relation to nutrient status in Jiaozhou Bay, China. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 89(3): 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao P, Yu Z G, Deng C M. 2006. Pigment signatures of some diatoms isolated from China seas. Acta. Oceano. Sin., 25(1): 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao P. 2005. Pigment Analysis and Chemotaxonomy of Phytoplankton in Jiaozhou Bay, China. Ph. D. Thesis, Ocean University China. (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • Yu Z G, Deng C M, Yao P, Zhen Y, Qian S B. 2007. Prasinoxanthin-containing Prasinophyceae discovered in Jiaozhou Bay, China. J. Integr. Plant Biol., 49(4): 497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata M, Garrido J L. 1991. Influence of injection conditions in reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography of chlorophylls and carotenoids. Chromatographia, 31: 589–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata M, Jeffrey S W, Wright S W, Rodríguez F, Garrido J L, Clementson L. 2004. Photosynthetic pigments in 37 species (65 strains) of Haptophyta: implications for oceanography and chemotaxonomy. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 270: 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata M, Rodríguez F, Garrido J L. 2000. Separation of chlorophylls and carotenoids from marine phytoplankton: A new HPLC method using a reversed phase C8 column and pyridine-containing mobile phases. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 195: 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhen Y, Mi T Z, Yu Z G. 2009. Detection of several harmful algal species by sandwich hybridization integrated with a nuclease protection assay. Harmful Algae, 8: 651–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhigang Yu  (于志刚).

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 40806029, 40676068), and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2006AA09Z178)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yao, P., Yu, Z., Deng, C. et al. Classification of marine diatoms using pigment ratio suites. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 29, 1075–1085 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-011-0202-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-011-0202-8

Keyword

Navigation