Abstract
We study the fidelity of single-qubit quantum gates performed with two-frequency laser fields that have a Gaussian or super Gaussian spatial mode. Numerical simulations are used to account for imperfections arising from atomic motion in an optical trap, spatially varying Stark shifts of the trapping and control beams, and transverse and axial misalignment of the control beams. Numerical results that account for the three-dimensional distribution of control light show that a super Gaussian mode with intensity \(I\sim \hbox {e}^{-2(r/w_0)^n}\) provides reduced sensitivity to atomic motion and beam misalignment. Choosing a super Gaussian with \(n=6\) the decay time of finite temperature Rabi oscillations can be increased by a factor of 60 compared to an \(n=2\) Gaussian beam, while reducing crosstalk to neighboring qubit sites.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T.D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, J.L. O’Brien, Nature 464, 45 (2010)
D. Schrader, I. Dotsenko, M. Khudaverdyan, Y. Miroshnychenko, A. Rauschenbeutel, D. Meschede, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 150501 (2004)
T. Xia, M. Lichtman, K. Maller, A.W. Carr, M.J. Piotrowicz, L. Isenhower, M. Saffman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 100503 (2015)
Y. Wang, X. Zhang, T.A. Corcovilos, A. Kumar, D.S. Weiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 043003 (2015)
J. Lee, E. Montano, I. Deutsch, P. Jessen, Nat. Commun. 4, 2027 (2013)
H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, D. Barredo, L. Béguin, F. Nogrette, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, Phys. Rev. A 90, 023415 (2014)
D.D. Yavuz, P.B. Kulatunga, E. Urban, T.A. Johnson, N. Proite, T. Henage, T.G. Walker, M. Saffman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 063001 (2006)
C. Knoernschild, X.L. Zhang, L. Isenhower, A.T. Gill, F.P. Lu, M. Saffman, J. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 134101 (2010)
M. Reetz-Lamour, T. Amthor, J. Deiglmayr, M. Weidemüller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 253001 (2008)
B. Huber, T. Baluktsian, M. Schlagmüller, A. Kölle, H. Kübler, R. Löw, T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 243001 (2011)
M. Saffman, Opt. Lett. 29, 1016 (2004)
G.D. Gillen, K. Gillen, S. Guha, Light Propagation in Linear Optical Media (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2013)
B. Lü, B. Zhang, X. Wang, Opt. Commun. 126, 1 (1996)
G.D. Gillen, S. Guha, Am. J. Phys. 72, 1195 (2004)
M.J. Piotrowicz, M. Lichtman, K. Maller, G. Li, S. Zhang, L. Isenhower, M. Saffman, Phys. Rev. A 88, 013420 (2013)
S. Zhang, F. Robicheaux, M. Saffman, Phys. Rev. A 84, 043408 (2011)
F. Le Kien, P. Schneeweiss, A. Rauschenbeutel, Eur. Phys. J. D 67, 1 (2013)
J.E. Sansonetti, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 38, 761 (2009)
E. Iskrenova-Tchoukova, M.S. Safronova, U.I. Safronova, J. Comp. Methods Sci. Eng. 7, 521 (2007)
S. Kuhr, W. Alt, D. Schrader, I. Dotsenko, Y. Miroshnychenko, A. Rauschenbeutel, D. Meschede, Phys. Rev. A 72, 023406 (2005)
D. Schrader, S. Kuhr, W. Alt, M. Müller, V. Gomer, D. Meschede, Appl. Phys. B 73, 819 (2001)
R. Grimm, M. Weidemüller, Y.B. Ovchinnikov, Adv. Opt. At. Mol. Phys. 42, 95 (2000)
K. Maller, M.T. Lichtman, T. Xia, Y. Sun, M.J. Piotrowicz, A.W. Carr, L. Isenhower, M. Saffman, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022336 (2015)
A.J. Wheeler, A.R. Ganji, Introduction to Engineering Experimentation (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1996)
E. Mount, C. Kabytayev, S. Crain, R. Harper, S.Y. Baek, G. Vrijsen, S.T. Flammia, K.R. Brown, P. Maunz, J. Kim, Phys. Rev. A 92, 060301(R) (2015)
J.A. Hoffnagle, C.M. Jefferson, Appl. Opt. 39, 5488 (2000)
C.Y. Han, Y. Ishii, K. Murata, Appl. Opt. 22, 3644 (1983)
M. Reetz-Lamour, J. Deiglmayr, T. Amthor, M. Weidemüller, New J. Phys. 10, 045026 (2008)
M. Pasienski, B. DeMarco, Opt. Express 16, 2176 (2008)
F. Nogrette, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, D. Barredo, L. Béguin, A. Vernier, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021034 (2014)
Acknowledgments
MS and MJP were supported by the IARPA MQCO program through ARO Contract W911NF-10-1-0347.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1: On-resonance Rabi frequency and differential AC Stark shift for two-photon Raman transitions via \(7^2P_{1/2}\) in \(^{133}\)Cs including hyperfine splitting
Appendix 1: On-resonance Rabi frequency and differential AC Stark shift for two-photon Raman transitions via \(7^2P_{1/2}\) in \(^{133}\)Cs including hyperfine splitting
The Rabi oscillations investigated in this work are driven via a Raman process from the \(F=3, m_F=0\) hyperfine ground state of the \(6^2S_{1/2}\) manifold in \(^{133}\)Cs to its \(F=4,m_F=0\) hyperfine ground state via the \(7^2P_{1/2}\) manifold using two laser beams. To treat this kind of Rabi oscillation, we repeat the steps from Sect. 2.4 for a \(\varLambda\)-type three-level system with two lasers tuned to the two transitions of the Raman process. For detunings large enough so that the excited-state population is small, we can adiabatically eliminate the \(7^2P_{1/2}\) state, resulting in an effective two-level Rabi oscillation with an on-resonance Rabi frequency of
where \(\varOmega _{1,2}\) are the single-photon on-resonance Rabi frequencies for the \(6^2S_{1/2}, F=3, m_F=0 \rightarrow 7^2P_{1/2}\) and \(7^2P_{1/2} \rightarrow 6^2S_{1/2}, F=4, m_F=0\) transitions, respectively. \(\varDelta _R\) is the detuning of the first Raman laser beam from the \(6^2S_{1/2}, F=3 \rightarrow 7^2P_{1/2}\) (fine structure level) transition, and we have assumed that the detuning of the second Raman laser from the \(6^2S_{1/2}, F=4 \rightarrow 7^2P_{1/2}\) transition is the same. Equation (20) is valid for two-photon resonance or when the departure from two-photon resonance is small compared to \(\varDelta _R\).
Taking into account the hyperfine splitting of the \(7^2P_{1/2}\) level, we have to sum over all possible intermediate states, resulting in
where \(F', F_{1,2}\) are the total angular momentum quantum numbers of the intermediate, initial, and final states, respectively, \(\varOmega _{1,F_1 F'}\) and \(\varOmega _{2,F' F_2}\) are the single-photon on-resonance Rabi frequencies for the \(F_1 \rightarrow F'\) and \(F' \rightarrow F_2\) transitions, respectively, and \(\varDelta _{R,F'}\) is the detuning of the first Raman laser beam from the \(F_1 \rightarrow F'\) transition.
In \(^{133}\)Cs, we have \(F_1=3\), \(F_2=4\), and \(F'=3,4\). We thus find for the two-photon on-resonance Rabi frequency
where we used primes to indicate quantum numbers pertaining to the excited states. The detunings from the \(7^2P_{1/2}\) hyperfine states are \(\varDelta _{R,3'}=\varDelta _R-\varDelta _{F'3}\) and \(\varDelta _{R,4'}=\varDelta _R-\varDelta _{F'4}\). Here, \(\varDelta _{F'3}=-2\pi \times 212.3\,\text {MHz}\) and \(\varDelta _{F'4}=2\pi \times 165.1\,\text {MHz}\) are the hyperfine shifts from the \(7^2P_{1/2}\) fine structure level to the \(F'=3,4\) hyperfine states, respectively.
The one-photon Rabi frequencies are \(\varOmega _{i,F_i F_f}=\varOmega _{i,0} \tilde{\varOmega }_{F_i F_f}\) with \(\varOmega _{i,0}= {\mathcal {E}}_i e \langle 7^2P_{1/2}||r||6^2S_{1/2}\rangle /\hbar\), where \({\mathcal {E}}_i\) is the electric field amplitude of Raman laser \(i=1,2\), \(e\langle 7^2P_{1/2}||r||6^2S_{1/2}\rangle\) is the reduced dipole matrix element for the \(6^2S_{1/2} \rightarrow 7^2P_{1/2}\) transition, e is the elementary charge, and
for a Raman absorption and
for a stimulated Raman emission. Here, \(C_{F_1,m_{F1},1,q_1}^{F',m_{F1}+q_1}\) and \(C_{F',m_{F1}+q_1,1,-q_2}^{F_2,m_{F1}+q_1-q_2}\) are Clebsch–Gordan coefficients, and
For our specific transitions in \(^{133}\)Cs, \(6^2S_{1/2}, F=3, m_F=0 \rightarrow 7^2P_{1/2}, F=3,4, m_F=1\) and \(7^2P_{1/2}, F=3,4, m_F=1 \rightarrow 6^2S_{1/2}, F=4, m_F=0\), the relevant quantum numbers are the initial and final total electron angular momentum quantum numbers \(J_1=J'=1/2\), the nuclear spin quantum number \(I=7/2\), the initial magnetic quantum number \(m_{F1}=0\), and we use circularly polarized Raman laser beams such that the z-components of the angular momentum of the absorbed and emitted photons are \(q_1=q_2=1\). With these, we find
The reduced dipole matrix element for the \(6^2S_{1/2}\rightarrow 7^2P_{1/2}\) transition in \(^{133}\)Cs is \(e\langle 7^2P_{1/2}||r||6^2S_{1/2}\rangle =0.276 ea_0\) [19], where \(a_0\) is the Bohr radius.
Altogether, we find the two-photon on-resonance Rabi frequency to be
To find the total Stark shift of each of the hyperfine ground states, we need to add the Stark shifts due to the first and second Raman laser beams, so
For each hyperfine ground state, we must sum over the contributions due to each of the hyperfine states of the \(7^2P_{1/2}\) manifold, resulting in
Thus, the AC Stark shift of the \(F=3\) hyperfine ground state due to the first Raman laser is
Similarly, the contribution to the AC Stark shift due to the second Raman laser is
where \(\varDelta _{hf}=2\pi \times 9.192631770\) GHz is the ground-state hyperfine splitting of \(^{133}\)Cs.
The contribution of the first Raman laser to the AC Stark shift of the \(F=4\) hyperfine ground state is
Here, we have used
and
Finally, the contribution of the second Raman laser beam to the AC Stark shift of the \(F=4\) ground state is
The differential Stark shift between the \(F=3\) and \(F=4\) hyperfine ground states is
In this work, we used two Raman laser beams of identical power, waist, and alignment, so \({\mathcal {E}}_1={\mathcal {E}}_2\), and consequently
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gillen-Christandl, K., Gillen, G.D., Piotrowicz, M.J. et al. Comparison of Gaussian and super Gaussian laser beams for addressing atomic qubits. Appl. Phys. B 122, 131 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-016-6407-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-016-6407-y