Skip to main content
Log in

Cardiac magnetic resonance for the early prediction of reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the changes in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) characteristics and investigate the predictors of reverse left ventricular remodeling (r-LVR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.

Materials and methods

Eighty-six STEMI patients (median 56 years) were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into r-LVR and without r-LVR groups. CMR analysis included LV volume, infarct characteristics, and global and regional myocardial function. The strain and displacement were assessed by CMR-feature tracking. The predictors of r-LVR were analyzed by the logistic regression method.

Results

There were 37 patients in the r-LVR group and 49 patients in the without r-LVR group. At initial CMR, there was no difference in LV volume and global cardiac function between the two groups. However, the infarct zone radial and longitudinal displacements were higher in the r-LVR group (< 0.05, respectively). At the second CMR, the r-LVR group showed higher LVEF, lower LV volume, and total enhanced mass (all < 0.05). The infarct zone radial and circumferential strains and radial displacement were higher in the r-LVR group (all < 0.05). The r-LVR group had better recovery of myocardial injury and function. Of note, microvascular obstruction (MVO) mass (odds ratio: 0.779 (0.613–0.989), = 0.041) and infarct zone peak longitudinal displacement (PLD) (odds ratio: 1.448 (1.044–2.008), = 0.026) were independent predictors of r-LVR.

Conclusions

At initial CMR, there were no differences in global cardiac function between the two groups, but infarct zone displacements were higher in the r-LVR group. The r-LVR group had better recovery of cardiac function. In addition, MVO mass and infarct zone PLD were independent predictors of r-LVR.

Clinical relevance statement

Our study assessed changes in cardiac structure, function, and tissue characteristics after STEMI by CMR, investigated the best predictors of r-LVR in STEMI patients, and laid the foundation for the development of new parameter-guided treatment strategies for STEMI patients.

Key Points

• At initial CMR, the reverse left ventricular remodeling (r-LVR) group had less myocardial damage and higher infarct zone displacement, but there were no differences in global function between the two groups.

• Both groups showed recovery of myocardial injury and cardiac function over time, but the r-LVR group had less enhanced mass and better cardiac function compared to the without r-LVR group at the second CMR.

• Microvascular obstruction mass and infarct zone peak longitudinal displacement by cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking were significant predictors of r-LVR in STEMI patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under the curve

CMR:

Cardiac magnetic resonance

CMR-FT:

Cardiac magnetic resonance- feature tracking

EMR:

Electronic medical record

LGE:

Late gadolinium enhancement

LV:

Left ventricular

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

LVESV:

Left ventricular end-systolic volume

MVO:

Microvascular obstruction

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

PLD:

Peak longitudinal displacement

R-LVR:

Reverse left ventricular remodeling

STEMI:

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

References

  1. Zahler D, Lee-Rozenfeld K, Ravid D et al (2019) Relation of lowering door-to-balloon time and mortality in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Res Cardiol 108:1053–1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Neumann JT, Goßling A, Sörensen NA, Blankenberg S, Magnussen C, Westermann D (2020) Temporal trends in incidence and outcome of acute coronary syndrome. Clin Res Cardiol 109:1186–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aimo A, Gaggin HK, Barison A, Emdin M, Januzzi JL Jr (2019) Imaging, biomarker, and clinical predictors of cardiac remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail 7:782–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reindl M, Tiller C, Holzknecht M et al (2021) Global longitudinal strain by feature tracking for optimized prediction of adverse remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Res Cardiol 110:61–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koitabashi N, Kass DA (2011) Reverse remodeling in heart failure--mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cardiol 9:147–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smiseth OA, Torp H, Opdahl A, Haugaa KH, Urheim S (2016) Myocardial strain imaging: how useful is it in clinical decision making. Eur Heart J 37:1196–1207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mann DL, Barger PM, Burkhoff D (2012) Myocardial recovery and the failing heart: myth, magic, or molecular target. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:2465–2472

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jessup M, Brozena S (2003) Heart failure. N Engl J Med 348:2007–2018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Breithardt OA (2013) Reversing heart failure by CRT: how long do the effects last. Eur Heart J 34:2582–2584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkpatrick JN, Vannan MA, Narula J, Lang RM (2007) Echocardiography in heart failure: applications, utility, and new horizons. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:381–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bulluck H, Dharmakumar R, Arai AE, Berry C, Hausenloy DJ (2018) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: recent advances, controversies, and future directions. Circulation 137:1949–1964

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Groot HE, Al Ali L, van der Horst I et al (2019) Plasma interleukin 6 levels are associated with cardiac function after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Res Cardiol 108:612–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eitel I, de Waha S, Wöhrle J et al (2014) Comprehensive prognosis assessment by CMR imaging after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:1217–1226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuster A, Hor KN, Kowallick JT, Beerbaum P, Kutty S (2016) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking: concepts and clinical applications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9:e004077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sardana M, Konda P, Hashmath Z et al (2019) Usefulness of left ventricular strain by cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking to predict cardiovascular events in patients with and without heart failure. Am J Cardiol 123:1301–1308

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 33:2551–2567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S et al (2018) 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 39:119–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. He J, Sirajuddin A, Li S et al (2021) Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in hypertension patients: a myocardial MR strain study. J Magn Reson Imaging 53:527–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eitel I, Desch S, Fuernau G et al (2010) Prognostic significance and determinants of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:2470–2479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reindl M, Tiller C, Holzknecht M et al (2019) Prognostic implications of global longitudinal strain by feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 12:e009404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bodi V, Monmeneu JV, Ortiz-Perez JT et al (2016) Prediction of reverse remodeling at cardiac mr imaging soon after first ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: results of a large prospective registry. Radiology 278:54–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bulluck H, Go YY, Crimi G et al (2017) Defining left ventricular remodeling following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Funaro S, La Torre G, Madonna M et al (2009) Incidence, determinants, and prognostic value of reverse left ventricular remodelling after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Acute Myocardial Infarction Contrast Imaging (AMICI) multicenter study. Eur Heart J 30:566–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Li.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Tao Li.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was not required for this study because this is a retrospective study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

Study subjects and cohorts have not been reported elsewhere.

Methodology

  • Retrospective

  • Observational

  • Performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, J., Zhao, Y., Qian, G. et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance for the early prediction of reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 33, 8501–8512 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09907-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09907-3

Keywords

Navigation