Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting coronary plaque progression with conventional plaque parameters and radiomics features derived from coronary CT angiography

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the value of combining conventional plaque parameters and radiomics features derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for predicting coronary plaque progression.

Materials and methods

Clinical data and CCTA images of 400 patients who underwent at least two CCTA examinations between January 2009 and August 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Diameter stenosis, total plaque volume and burden, calcified plaque volume and burden, noncalcified plaque volume and burden (NCPB), pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI), and other conventional plaque parameters were recorded. The patients were assigned to a training cohort (n = 280) and a validation cohort (n = 120) in a 7:3 ratio using a stratified random splitting method. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the predictive abilities of conventional parameters (model 1), radiomics features (model 2), and their combination (model 3).

Results

FAI and NCPB were identified as independent risk factors for coronary plaque progression in the training cohort. Both model 2 (training cohort AUC: 0.814, p < 0.001; validation cohort AUC: 0.729, p = 0.288) and model 3 (training cohort AUC: 0.824, p < 0.001; validation cohort AUC: 0.758, p = 0.042) had better diagnostic performances in predicting plaque progression than model 1 (training cohort AUC: 0.646; validation cohort AUC: 0.654). Moreover, model 3 was slightly higher than model 2, although not statistically significant.

Conclusions

The combination of conventional coronary plaque parameters and CCTA-derived radiomics features had a better ability to predict plaque progression than conventional parameters alone.

Clinical relevance statement

The conventional coronary plaque characteristics such as noncalcified plaque burden, pericoronary fat attenuation index, and radiomics features derived from CCTA can identify plaques prone to progression, which is helpful for further clinical decision-making of coronary artery disease.

Key Points

• FAI and NCPB were identified as independent risk factors for predicting plaque progression.

• Coronary plaque radiomics features were more advantageous than conventional parameters in predicting plaque progression.

• The combination of conventional coronary plaque parameters and radiomics features could significantly improve the predictive ability of plaque progression over conventional parameters alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CCTA:

Coronary computed tomography angiography

CPB:

Calcified plaque burden

CPV:

Calcified plaque volume

DS:

Diameter stenosis

FAI:

Fat attenuation index

FPB:

Fibrous plaque burden

FPV:

Fibrous plaque volume

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

LL:

Lesion length

LPB:

Lipid-rich plaque burden

LPV:

Lipid-rich plaque volume

NCPB:

Noncalcified plaque burden

NCPV:

Non-calcified plaque volume

PB:

Plaque burden

RF:

Random forest

TPB:

Total plaque burden

TPV:

Total plaque volume

References

  1. Won KB, Park EJ, Han D et al (2020) Triglyceride glucose index is an independent predictor for the progression of coronary artery calcification in the absence of heavy coronary artery calcification at baseline. Cardiovasc Diabetol 19:34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Han Y, Xie H, Liu Y et al (2019) Effect of metformin on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with coronary artery diseases: a systematic review and an updated meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol 18:96

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ et al (2011) A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 364:226–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Assen M, Varga-Szemes A, Schoepf UJ et al (2010) Automated plaque analysis for the prognostication of major adverse cardiac events. Eur J Radiol 116:76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kolossváry M, Park J, Bang JI et al (2019) Identification of invasive and radionuclide imaging markers of coronary plaque vulnerability using radiomic analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:1250–1258

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu M, Dai X, Deng J et al (2020) Diagnostic performance of perivascular fat attenuation index to predict hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis: a preliminary coronary computed tomography angiography study. Eur Radiol 30:673–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goeller M, Tamarappoo BK, Kwan AC et al (2019) Relationship between changes in pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation and coronary plaque burden quantified from coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:636–643

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolossváry M, Karády J, Szilveszter B et al (2017) Radiomic features are superior to conventional quantitative computed tomographic metrics to identify coronary plaques with napkin-ring sign. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10:e006843

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee SE, Sung JM, Rizvi A et al (2018) Quantification of coronary atherosclerosis in the assessment of coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 11:e007562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SE, Sung JM, Andreini D et al (2020) Differences in progression to obstructive lesions per high-risk plaque features and plaque volumes with CCTA. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13:1409–1417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu X, Zhu Y, Xu H et al (2014) An individualized contrast material injection protocol with respect to patient-related factors for dual-source CT coronary angiography. Clin Radiol 69:e86-92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang J, Dou G, Tesche C et al (2019) Progression of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and relationship with adverse cardiovascular event in asymptomatic diabetic patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 19:39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Oikonomou EK, Marwan M, Desai MY et al (2018) Non-invasive detection of coronary inflammation using computed tomography and prediction of residual cardiovascular risk (the CRISP CT study): a post-hoc analysis of prospective outcome data. Lancet 392:929–939

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang L, Tan J, Ge Y et al (2021) Assessment of liver metastases radiomic feature reproducibility with deeplearning-based semi-automatic segmentation software. Acta Radiol 62:291–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lambin P, Leijenaar R, Deist TM et al (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14:749–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dong F, Li Q, Xu D et al (2019) Differentiation between pilocytic astrocytoma and glioblastoma: a decision tree model using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-derived quantitative radiomic features. Eur Radiol 29:3968–3975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Han D, Berman DS, Miller RJH et al (2020) Association of cardiovascular disease risk factor burden with progression of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by serial coronary computed tomographic angiography. JAMA Netw Open 3:e2011444

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Finck T, Stojanovic A, Will A et al (2020) Long-term prognostic value of morphological plaque features on coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:237–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Antonopoulos AS, Margaritis M, Coutinho P et al (2015) Adiponectin as a link between type 2 diabetes and vascular NADPH oxidase activity in the human arterial wall: the regulatory role of perivascular adipose tissue. Diabete 64:2207–2219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Antonopoulos AS, Sanna F, Sabharwal N et al (2017) Detecting human coronary inflammation by imaging perivascular fat. Sci Transl Med 9: eaal2658

  22. Lin A, Kolossváry M, Išgum I et al (2020) Artificial intelligence: improving the efficiency of cardiovascular imaging. Expert Rev Med Devices 17:565–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakakura K, Nakano M, Otsuka F et al (2013) Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis plaque progression. Heart Lung Circ 22:399–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of this study for their valuable contributions.

Funding

The authors declare that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yi Xu, Xiaohu Li or Yinsu Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Feiyun Wu.

Conflict of interest

One of the authors of this manuscript (Shushen Lin) is an employee of Siemens Healthineers. The remaining authors declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

No study subjects or cohorts overlap are reported.

Methodology

• retrospective

• diagnostic or prognostic study

• performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 41 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, C., Chen, R., Dong, S. et al. Predicting coronary plaque progression with conventional plaque parameters and radiomics features derived from coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol 33, 8513–8520 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09809-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09809-4

Keywords

Navigation