Abstract
Objective
To investigate the feasibility of MRI for non-invasive assessment of the coronary sinus (CS) and the number and course of its major tributaries in heart failure patients.
Methods
Fourteen non-ischaemic heart failure patients scheduled for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) underwent additional whole-heart coronary venography. MRI was performed 1 day before device implantation. The visibility, location and dimensions of the CS and its major tributaries were assessed and the number of potential implantation sites identified. The MRI results were validated by X-ray venography conventionally acquired during the device implantation procedure.
Results
The right atrium (RA), CS and mid-cardiac vein (MCV) could be visualised in all patients. 36% of the identified candidate branches were located posterolaterally, 48% laterally and 16% anterolaterally. The average diameter of the CS was quantified as 9.8 mm, the posterior interventricular vein (PIV) 4.6 mm, posterolateral segments 3.3 mm, lateral 2.9 mm and anterolateral 2.9 mm. Concordance with X-ray in terms of number and location of candidate branches was given in most cases.
Conclusion
Contrast-enhanced MRI venography appears feasible for non-invasive pre-interventional assessment of the course of the CS and its major tributaries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Sack S et al (2002) Long-term clinical effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:2026–2033
Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T et al (2001) Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 344:873–880
Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL et al (2002) Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 346:1845–1853
Young JB, Abraham WT, Smith AL et al (2003) Combined cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioversion defibrillation in advanced chronic heart failure: the MIRACLE ICD Trial. JAMA 289:2685–2694
Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J et al (2004) Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 350:2140–2150
Cleland JGF, Daubert J, Erdmann E et al (2005) The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 352:1539–1549
Ypenburg C, Westenberg JJ, Bleeker GB et al (2008) Noninvasive imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy—part 1: selection of patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 31:1475–1499
Ypenburg C, Van De Veire N, Westenberg JJ et al (2008) Noninvasive imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy—Part 2: follow-up and optimization of settings. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 31:1628–1639
Sá MI, de Roos A, Westenberg JJM, Kroft LJM (2008) Imaging techniques in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:89–105
Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L et al (2008) Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation 117:2608–2616
Busch S, Johnson TRC, Wintersperger BJ et al (2008) Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings. Eur Radiol 18:570–575
Delfino JG, Fornwalt BK, Oshinski JN, Lerakis S (2008) Role of MRI in patient selection for CRT. Echocardiography 25:1176–1185
Rüssel IK, Zwanenburg JJM, Germans T et al (2007) Mechanical dyssynchrony or myocardial shortening as MRI predictor of response to biventricular pacing? J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1452–1460
Bilchick KC, Dimaano V, Wu KC et al (2008) Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of dyssynchrony and myocardial scar predicts function class improvement following cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:561–568
Henneman MM, van der Wall EE, Ypenburg C et al (2007) Nuclear imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Nucl Med 48:2001–2010
White JA, Yee R, Yuan X et al (2006) Delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intraventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1953–1960
Helm RH, Lardo AC (2008) Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony. Curr Opin Cardiol 23:440–446
Delfino JG, Johnson KR, Eisner RL et al (2008) Three-directional myocardial phase-contrast tissue velocity MR imaging with navigator-echo gating: in vivo and in vitro study. Radiology 246:917–925
Götte MJW, Germans T, Rüssel IK et al (2006) Myocardial strain and torsion quantified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance tissue tagging: studies in normal and impaired left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:2002–2011
Westenberg JJM, Lamb HJ, van der Geest RJ et al (2006) Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with conduction delay and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: head-to-head comparison between tissue doppler imaging and velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2042–2048
Axel L, Montillo A, Kim D (2005) Tagged magnetic resonance imaging of the heart: a survey. Med Image Anal 9:376–393
Föll D, Jung B, Staehle F et al (2009) Visualization of multidirectional regional left ventricular dynamics by high-temporal-resolution tissue phase mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:1043–1052
Rasche V, Binner L, Cavagna F et al (2007) Whole-heart coronary vein imaging: a comparison between non-contrast-agent- and contrast-agent-enhanced visualization of the coronary venous system. Magn Reson Med 57:1019–1026
Nezafat R, Han Y, Peters DC et al (2007) Coronary magnetic resonance vein imaging: imaging contrast, sequence, and timing. Magn Reson Med 58:1196–1206
Chiribiri A, Kelle S, Köhler U et al (2008) Magnetic resonance cardiac vein imaging: relation to mitral valve annulus and left circumflex coronary artery. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:729–738
Stoeck CT, Han Y, Peters DC et al (2009) Whole heart magnetization-prepared steady-state free precession coronary vein MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:1293–1299
Younger JF, Plein S, Crean A, Ball SG, Greenwood JP (2009) Visualization of coronary venous anatomy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11:26
Look DC, Locker DR (1970) Time saving in measurement of NMR and EPR relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum 41:250–251
Chiribiri A, Kelle S, Götze S et al (2008) Visualization of the cardiac venous system using cardiac magnetic resonance. Am J Cardiol 101:407–412
Dewey M, Kaufels N, Laule M et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial perfusion and viability using a blood pool contrast agent. Invest Radiol 39:498
Maisel WH, Stevenson LW (2003) Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and rationale for therapy. JACC 91(Suppl 1):2–8
Acknowledgements
RM is a full-time employee of Philips Research, Europe. VR receives grant support by Philips Healthcare.
Authors would like to thank Mrs. M. Duda and Mrs. A. Subgang for patient preparation and carrying out MRI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manzke, R., Binner, L., Bornstedt, A. et al. Assessment of the coronary venous system in heart failure patients by blood pool agent enhanced whole-heart MRI. Eur Radiol 21, 799–806 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1961-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1961-x