Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Efficacy of breast shielding during CT of the head

  • Breast
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

In light of increasing frequency of CT examinations in the past decades, the aims of this prospective study were to investigate scatter radiation breast exposure in head CT and its dependence upon body constitution, and to assess the efficacy of lead shielding as a means of breast dose reduction. In 49 women referred to head CT for objective medical reasons one breast was covered with lead apron during CT scanning. Radiation doses were measured by use of thermoluminescent dosimeters, at skin of both breasts and over the apron. The doses were then compared as well as correlated to body mass index and meatus acusticus externus-to-dosimeter distance, respectively. Average exposure at the skin of the unshielded breast was 0.28 mGy (range 0.15–0.41 mGy), compared with 0.13 mGy (range 0.05–0.29 mGy) at the shielded breast. The doses showed a mean reduction by 57% due to lead shielding. At least half of breast exposure was imparted to the breast from outside, whereas the remainder results from internal scatter. The higher the body mass index, the higher the percentage of internal scatter in total breast dose. Although the level of scatter radiation to the breast is generally low during head CT examination, the use of lead cover enables recognizable further reduction of the exposure, and is recommended as a feasible and effective procedure of breast protection during CT of the head.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shrimpton PC, Edyvean S (1998) CT scanner dosimetry. Br J Radiol 71:1–3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hopper KD, King SH, Lobel ME, TenHave TR, Weaver JS (1997) The breast: in-plane X-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT-shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. Radiology 205:853–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohnen M, Poll L, Puttmann C, Ewen K, Modder U (2001) Radiation exposure in multi-slice CT of the heart. Fortshr Röntgenstr 173:295–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fordham LA, Brown ED, Washburn D, Clark RL (1997) Efficacy and feasibility of breast shielding during abdominal fluoroscopic examinations. Acad Radiol 4:639–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beaconsfeld T, Nicholson R, Thornton A, Al-Kutoubi A (1998) Would thyroid and breast shielding be beneficial in CT of the head? Eur Radiol 8:664–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Klein R, Aichinger H, Dierker J, Jansen JT, Joite-Barfuss S, Sabel M, Shultz-Wendtlant R, Zoetelief J (1997) Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients. Phys Med Biol 42:651–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burch A, Goodman DA (1998) A pilot survey of radiation doses received in the United Kingdom Breast Screening Program. Br J Radiol 71:517–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans SH, Davis R, Cooke J, Anderson W (1989) A comparison of radiation doses to the breast in computed tomographic chest examinations for two scanning protocols. Clin Radiol 40:45–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hein E, Rogalla P, Klingebiel R, Hamm B (2002) Low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses with eye-lens protection: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 12:1693–1696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Price R, Halson P, Sampson M (1999) Dose reduction during CT scanning in an anthropomorphic phantom by the use of a male gonad shield. Br J Radiol 72:489–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hidajat N, Schröder RJ, Vogl T, Schedel H, Felix R (1996) Effektivität der bleiabdeckung zur dosisreduktion beim patienten in der computertomographie. Fortschr Rontgenstr 145:462–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miljanić S, Ranogajec-Komor M, Knežević Ž, Vekić B (2002) Main dosimetric characteristics of some tissue-equivalent TL detectors. Radiat Prot Dosim 100:437–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mustafa AA, Janeczek J (1989) Organ doses from cardiac and carotid digital subtraction angiography. Br J Radiol 62:838–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Whelan C, McLean D, Poulos A (1999) Investigation of thyroid dose due to mammography. Australas Radiol 43:307–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gentry JR, DeWerd LA (1997) TLD measurements of in-vivo mammographic exposures and calculated mean glandular dose in the United States. Med Phys 24:309–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. International Atomic Energy Agency (1996) International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources. Vienna, p 280

  17. Davis FG, Boice JD, Hrubec Z, Monson R (1989) Cancer mortality in a radiation-exposed cohort of Massachusetts tuberculosis patients. Cancer Res 49:6130–6136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tse V, Lising J, Khadra M, Chiam Q, Nugent R, Yeaman L, Mulcahy M (1999) Radiation exposure during fluoroscopy: Should we be protecting our thyroids? Aust N Z J Surg 69:847–848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rowley KA, Hill SJ, Watkins RA, Moores BM (1987) An investigation into the levels of radiation exposure in diagnostic examinations involving fluoroscopy. Br J Radiol 60:167–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) ICRP Publication 60. 1990 Recommendations of the Commission on Radiological Protection. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 136

  21. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2001) ICRP Publication 87. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 31

  22. Christy M (1981) Active bone marrow distribution as a function of age in humans. Phys Med Biol 26:389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cohnen M, Cohnen B, Ewen K, Teubert G, Moder U (1998) Dossismessungen bei spiral-CT-Untersuchungen der Kopf-Hals-Region. Fortshr Rontgenstr 168:474–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lakits A, Prokesh R, Scholda C, Nowotny R, Kaider A, Bankier A (2000) Helical and conventional CT in imaging of metallic foreign bodies in the orbit. Acta Ophthalm Scand 78:79–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hidajat N, Maurer J, Schroder RJ, Wolf M, Vogl T, Felix R (1999) Radiation exposure in spiral computed tomography: dose distribution and dose reduction. Invest Radiol 34:51–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pitman AG, Budd RS, McKenzie AF (1991) Radiation dose in computed tomography of the pelvis: comparison of helical and axial scanning. Australas Radiol 413:29–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr. Kruno and Mr. Jovica for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Merkur, Zajčeva 19, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia

    Z. Brnić, A. Hebrang & P. Anić

  2. "Ruđer Bošković" Research Institute, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia

    B. Vekić

Authors
  1. Z. Brnić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Vekić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Hebrang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Anić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Brnić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brnić, Z., Vekić, B., Hebrang, A. et al. Efficacy of breast shielding during CT of the head. Eur Radiol 13, 2436–2440 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-1945-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-1945-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation