Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Decline of the breeding population of Pygoscelis antarctica and Pygoscelis adeliae on Penguin Island, South Shetland, Antarctica

  • Short Note
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work is a quantitative analysis of the population of breeding pairs of Pygoscelis adeliae and Pygoscelis antarctica, which use Penguin Island as a breeding area. There was a decrease in the populations of P. adeliae and P. antarctica by 75 and 66%, respectively, from the breeding season of 1979/1980 to 2003/2004. A mixed breeding colony of both species was also documented, according to published data which has existed since 1979/1980. The P. antarctica has an advantage over P. adeliae in this mixed breeding situation, where the breeding pairs of the former increased by 127%, indicating an interspecies competition for nesting ground.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Birkenmajer K (1982) The Penguin Island Volcano, South Shetland Islands (Antarctica): its structure and succession. Stud Geol Pol LXXIV:155–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy JWH (1975) Recent increases in penguin populations in Antarctic and sub-Antarctic. In: Stonehouse B (ed) The biology of penguins. Maccmillan, London, pp 321–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Croxall JP, Kirkwood ED (1979). The distribution of penguins on the Antarctic Peninsula and Islands of the Scotia Sea. British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, Report pp 186

  • Croxall JP, Trathan PN, Murphy EJ (2002) Environmental change and Antarctic Seabird population. Polar Sci 297:1510–1514

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser WR, Patterson DL (1997) Human disturbance and long-term changes in Adelie penguin populations: a natural experiment at Palmer Station, Antarctic Peninsula. In: Battaglia B, Valencia J, Walton DWH (eds) Antarctic communities: species, structure and survival, vol 63. Cambridge, pp 445–452

  • Jablònski B (1980) Distribution and numbers of birds and pinnipedes on Penguin Island (South Shetland Islands) in January 1979. Pol Polar Res 1(1):109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablònski B (1984) Distribution and numbers of penguins in the region of King George Island (South Shetlands Islands) in the breeding season 1980/1981. Pol Polar Res 5(1–2):17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynnes AS, Reid K, Croxall JP, Trathan PN (2002) Conflict or co-existence? Foraging distribution and competition for prey between Adélie and Chinstrap penguins. Marine Biol 141:1165–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveen R, Forrest SC, Dagit RG, Blight LK, Trivelpiece WZ, Trivelpiece SG (2000) Censuses of penguin, blue-eyed shag and southern giant petrel populations in the Antarctic Peninsula region, 1994–2000. Polar Rec (36):323–334

  • Pereira AB, Sander M, Strieder MN (1990) Biologic notes about turret point, King George Island, Antarctica. Pesq Antárt Bras 2(1):79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer S, Peter HU (2003) Umsetzung des Umweltschutzprotokoll-Ausführungsgesetzes (AUG), Teilvorhaben 3: Bestandsaufnahme und Managementpläne für zwei touristisch genutzte Gebiete der Antarktis. Umweltbundesamt, Forschungsbericht 29819 159, p 247

  • Pfeiffer S, Peter H-U (2004) Ecological studies toward the management of an Antarctic tourist landing site (Penguin Island South Shetland Islands). Polar Rec 40(215):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sladen WJL, Wood RC, Monagham EP (1968) The USA RP bird banding program, 1958–1965, vol 12. Antarctic Research Series, Antarctic bird studies, Baltimore, pp 213–262

  • Shuford WD, Spear LB (1988) Survey of breeding Chinstrap penguins in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Br Antarct Surv Bull 81:9–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivelpiece W, Volkman NJ (1979) Nest site competition between Adelie and Chinstrap penguins: an ecological interpretation. Auk 96:675–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivelpiece W, Butler RG, Volkman NJ (1981) Pygoscelid penguins of Admiralty Bay. Antarctic J US 16:50–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivelpiece WZ, Trivelpiece SG, Volkman NJ (1987) Ecological segregation of adelie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. Ecology 58(2):351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivelpiece WZ, Trivelpiece SG, Geupel GR, Kjelmyr J, Volkman NJ (1990) Adélie and Chinstrap penguins: their potential as monitors of the Southern Ocean marine ecosystem. In: Karry KR, Hempel G (eds) Antarctic ecosystems. Ecological change and conservation. Spinger, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RP, Culik RD, Adelung D (1991) Peolple in Antarctica—how much do Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae care? Polar Biol 11:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woehler EJ, Cooper J, Croxall JP, Fraser WR, Kooyman GL, Miller GD, Nel DC, Patterson DL, Peter HU, Ribic CA, Salwicka K, Trivelpiece WZ, Weimerskirch H (2001) A statistical assessment of the status and trends of Antarctic and sub Antarctic seabirds. Report on SCAR BBS Workshop on Southern Ocean seabirds populations

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), the Secretary of the Inter-ministerial Commission for the Resources of the Sea (SeCIRM) and the team of the Laboratory of Ornithology and Marine Animals of the Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Thanks for the referees for the essentials suggestions and contributions and to Pe Edward Benya SJ for English revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Sander.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sander, M., Balbão, T.C., Costa, E.S. et al. Decline of the breeding population of Pygoscelis antarctica and Pygoscelis adeliae on Penguin Island, South Shetland, Antarctica. Polar Biol 30, 651–654 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-006-0218-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-006-0218-2

Keywords

Navigation