Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of ultrasonography on treatment decision in rheumatoid arthritis: the IMPULSAR study

  • Health Services Research
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasonography (US) has shown to be more sensitive than physical examination for diagnosis and assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is also a useful approach for accurate monitoring and intensive treatment adjustment. However, there is limited information concerning the impact of US on therapeutic decision-making in routine daily practice. A single-center cross-sectional study in routine daily practice was conducted to determine the percentage of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in which treatment decision was modified on the basis of results of musculoskeletal ultrasonography. All consecutive patients with RA visited for the control of their disease between September and November 2014 were included. Patients were visited by their attending rheumatologist, who made a therapeutic decision according to the results of physical examination and laboratory tests. Thereafter, a musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) was performed by an independent expert sonographer. According to US findings, a change in therapeutic decision was considered, and categorized as ‘negative’ (maintenance of the therapeutic attitude) or ‘positive’ (intensification or reduction of treatment). A total of 78 patients (83% women, mean age 63.3 years) were included. In 29 patients [32%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 26.5–48.9], a change in the therapeutic decision was made, which included intensification of treatment in 18 (62.1%) and reduction of treatment in 11 (37.9%). Change of treatment was more frequent in patients with intermediate disease activity (low and moderate) than in those in clinical remission or with high activity (41.4 vs. 25%), in men than in women (53.8 vs. 33.8%), and in the presence than in the absence of bone erosions (43.6 vs. 21.7%), although differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that in patients with RA, joint US is a relevant complementary tool for treatment decisions in daily practice, particularly in patients with intermediate disease activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bakker MF, Jacobs JW, Verstappen SM, Bijlsma JW (2007) Tight control in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: efficacy and feasibility. Ann Rheum Dis 66(Suppl 3):iii56–iii60

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schipper LG, Vermeer M, Kuper HH, Hoekstra MO, Haagsma CJ, Den Broeder AA, Den Broeder AA, van Riel P, Fransen J, van de Laar MA (2012) A tight control treatment strategy aiming for remission in early rheumatoid arthritis is more effective than usual care treatment in daily clinical practice: a study of two cohorts in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring registry. Ann Rheum Dis 71:845–850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vermeer M, Kievit W, Kuper HH, Braakman-Jansen LM, Bernelot Moens HJ, Zijlstra TR, den Broeder AA, van Riel PL, Fransen J, van de Laar MA (2013) Treating to the target of remission in early rheumatoid arthritis is cost-effective: results of the DREAM registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:350

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr, Akl EA, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Vaysbrot E, McNaughton C, Osani M, Shmerling RH, Curtis JR, Furst DE, Parks D, Kavanaugh A, O’Dell J, King C, Leong A, Matteson EL, Schousboe JT, Drevlow B, Ginsberg S, Grober J, St Clair EW, Tindall E, Miller AS, McAlindon T (2016) 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 68:1–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC, Buch M, Burmester G, Dougados M, Emery P, Gaujoux-Viala C, Gossec L, Nam J, Ramiro S, Winthrop K, de Wit M, Aletaha D, Betteridge N, Bijlsma JW, Boers M, Buttgereit F, Combe B, Cutolo M, Damjanov N, Hazes JM, Kouloumas M, Kvien TK, Mariette X, Pavelka K, van Riel PL, Rubbert-Roth A, Scholte-Voshaar M, Scott DL, Sokka-Isler T, Wong JB, van der Heijde D (2014) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis 73:492–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanmartí R, García-Rodríguez S, Álvaro-Gracia JM, Andreu JL, Balsa A, Cáliz R, Fernández-Nebro A, Ferraz-Amaro I, Gómez-Reino JJ, González-Álvaro I, Martín-Mola E, Martínez-Taboada VM, Ortiz AM, Tornero J, Marsal S, Moreno-Muelas JV (2015) 2014 update of the Consensus Statement of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on the use of biological therapies in rheumatoid arthritis. Reumatol Clin 11:279–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirkham JJ, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, Williamson PR (2013) Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years. Trials 14:324. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-324

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaujoux-Viala C, Mouterde G, Baillet A, Claudepierre P, Fautrel B, Le Loët X, Maillefert JF (2012) Evaluating disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: which composite index is best? A systematic literature analysis of studies comparing the psychometric properties of the DAS, DAS28, SDAI and CDAI. Jt Bone Spine 79:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karim Z, Wakefield RJ, Quinn M, Conaghan PG, Brown AK, Veale DJ, O’Connor P, Reece R, Emery P (2004) Validation and reproducibility of ultrasonography in the detection of synovitis in the knee: a comparison with arthroscopy and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum 50:387–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M (2003) Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 48:955–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Ostergaard M (2001) Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 44:2018–2023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wells AF, Haddad RH (2011) Emerging role of ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: optimizing diagnosis, measuring disease activity and identifying prognostic factors. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:1173–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceponis A, Onishi M, Bluestein HG, Kalunian K, Townsend J, Kavanaugh A (2014) Utility of the ultrasound examination of the hand and wrist joints in the management of established rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 66:236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Micu MC, Alcalde M, Sáenz JI, Crespo M, Collado P, Bolboacă SD, Naredo E (2013) Impact of musculoskeletal ultrasound in an outpatient rheumatology clinic. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 65(4):615–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dale J, Purves D, McConnachie A, McInnes I, Porter D (2014) Tightening up? Impact of musculoskeletal ultrasound disease activity assessment on early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated using a treat-to-target strategy. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 66:16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, Filippucci E, Backhaus M, D’Agostino MA, Sanchez EN, Iagnocco A, Schmidt WA, Bruyn GA, Kane D, O’Connor PJ, Manger B, Joshua F, Koski J, Grassi W, Lassere MN, Swen N, Kainberger F, Klauser A, Ostergaard M, Brown AK, Machold KP, Conaghan PG; OMERACT 7 Special Interest Group (2005) Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol 32(12):2485–2487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Szkudlarek M, Terslev L, Wakefield RJ, Backhaus M, Balint PV, Bruyn GA, Filippucci E, Gandjbakhch F, Iagnocco A, Mandl P, Möller I, Naredo E, Schmidt WA, d’Agostino MA (2016) Summary findings of a systematic literature review of the ultrasound assessment of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 43:12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ben Abdelghani K, Miladi S, Souabni L, Kassab S, Chekili S, Laatar A, Zakraoui L (2015) Role of ultrasound in assessing remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Diagn Interv Imaging 96:3–10.

  20. Nguyen H, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Gandjbakhch F, Constantin A, Foltz V, Cantagrel A (2014) Prevalence of ultrasound-detected residual synovitis and risk of relapse and structural progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 53:2110–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruyn GA, Hanova P, Iagnocco A, d’Agostino MA, Möller I, Terslev L, Backhaus M, Balint PV, Filippucci E, Baudoin P, van Vugt R, Pineda C, Wakefield R, Garrido J, Pecha O, Naredo E (2014) Ultrasound definition of tendon damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a OMERACT consensus-based ultrasound score focussing on the diagnostic reliability. Ann Rheum Dis 73:1929–1934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lopez-Gonzalez R, Seoane-Mato D, Perez-Vicente S, Martin-Martinez MA, Sanchez-Alonso F, Silva-Fernandez L (2016) Variability in the frequency of rheumatology consultations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Spain. Rheumatol Int 36:1525–1534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Naredo E, Rodríguez M, Campos C, Rodríguez-Heredia JM, Medina JA, Giner E, Martínez O, Toyos FJ, Ruíz T, Ros I, Pujol M, Miquel X, García L, Aznar JJ, Chamizo E, Páez M, Morales P, Rueda A, Tuneu R, Corominas H, de Agustín JJ, Moragues C, Mínguez D, Willisch A, González-Cruz I, Aragón A;Iglesias G, Armas C, Pablo Valdazo J, Vargas C, Calvo-Alén J, Juan-Mas A, Salvador G, Puigdollers A, Galíndez E, Garrido N, Salaberri J, Raya E, Salles M, Díaz C, Cuadra JL, Garrido J, Ultrasound Group of The Spanish Society of Rheumatology (2008) Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a twelve-joint simplified power doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 59(4):515–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Marta Pulido, MD, for editing the manuscript and editorial assistance.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Rheumatology Unit, Service of Internal Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, C/ Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain

      Cèsar Díaz-Torné, Carme Moragues, Elide Toniolo, Carme Geli, Iván Castellví, Patricia Moya, Ignasi Gich & Josep M. Llobet

    Authors
    1. Cèsar Díaz-Torné
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Carme Moragues
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Elide Toniolo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Carme Geli
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Iván Castellví
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Patricia Moya
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Ignasi Gich
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Josep M. Llobet
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Cèsar Díaz-Torné.

    Ethics declarations

    Conflict of interest

    None to be declared.

    Funding

    Financial support for this research was provided by Abbvie.

    Additional information

    C. Díaz-Torné and C. Moragues contributed equally to this study.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Díaz-Torné, C., Moragues, C., Toniolo, E. et al. Impact of ultrasonography on treatment decision in rheumatoid arthritis: the IMPULSAR study. Rheumatol Int 37, 891–896 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3689-2

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3689-2

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation