Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence and factors affecting glucosamine use in Korea: a survey-based study

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glucosamine and chondroitin are widely used as pharmaceutical and dietary supplements. However, there is a lack of information regarding consumer consumption of glucosamine and chondroitin in the Republic of Korea. We investigated the prevalence and factors affecting the use of glucosamine products in the general population aged 40 years and older in the Republic of Korea. We conducted this descriptive and exploratory study using a telephone-based survey with a structured questionnaire. We randomly selected subjects using a proportional allocation method based on age, gender, and region. We started the survey on September 19, 2009, and continued the survey until we obtained 1,000 respondents who were currently taking glucosamine or chondroitin, which occured on September 30, 2009. Among the 8,135 people approached, the response rate was 29.6%. A total of 12.2% of respondents (n = 991) were current users of glucosamine, while only 0.1% (n = 9) were current users of chondroitin. Two-fifths of current glucosamine users were not diagnosed with osteoarthritis by a doctor nor did they experience arthritis pain. These participants used glucosamine to maintain and promote joint health. Information on glucosamine was mainly obtained through advertisements on television or the Internet. Seventy percent of current users indicated that they did not know the composition of the glucosamine they took. Appropriate information and guides concerning glucosamine or chondroitin usage should be provided by expert clinicians because of the accessibility of both these cartilage derivatives as supplements and medical drugs in the Republic of Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Kim H, Kim M (2009) A study of the demographic characteristics and socio-psychological factors affecting willingness to take health foods among elderly. Korean Assoc Human Ecol 18:201–210 Korean

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Korea Food & Drug Administration (2008) Food & drug statistical yearbook. Republic of Korea, Seoul: Korea Food & Drug Administration, Korean

  3. Herman CJ, Allen P, Hunt WC, Prasad A, Brady TJ (2004) Use of complementary therapies among primary care clinic patients with arthritis. Prev Chronic Dis 1:A12. doi:10.1002/art.21443

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim H, Kim M (2009) A study of the demographic characteristics and socio-psychological factors affecting willingness to take health foods among elderly. Korean Assoc human ecology 18:201–210 Korean

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blakeley JA, Ribeiro V (2002) A survey of self-medication practices and perceived effectiveness of glucosamine products among older adults. Complement Ther Med 10:154–160. doi:10.1016/S0965229902000559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marinac JS, Buchinger CL, Godfrey LA, Wooten JM, Sun C, Willsie SK (2007) Herbal products and dietary supplements: a survey of use, attitudes, and knowledge among older adults. J Am Osteopath Assoc 107:13–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jordan KM, Sawyer S, Coakley P, Smith HE, Cooper C, Arden NK (2004) The use of conventional and complementary treatments for knee osteoarthritis in the community. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43:381–384. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blakeley JA, Ribeiro V (2002) A survey of self-medication practices and perceived effectiveness of glucosamine products among older adults. Complement Ther Med 10:154–160. doi:10.1016/S0965229902000559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Towheed T, Maxwell L, Anastassiades TP, Shea B, Houpt J, Welch V, Hochberg MC, Wells GA (2005) Glucosamine therapy for treating osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Issue 2. Art. No.: CD002946. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002946.pub2

  10. Black C, Clar C, Henderson R, MacEachern C, McNamee P, Quayyum Z, Royle P, Thomas S (2009) The clinical effectiveness of glucosamine and chondroitin supplements in slowing or arresting progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 13:1–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vlad SC, LaValley MP, McAlindon TE, Felson DT (2007) Glucosamine for pain in osteoarthritis: why do trial results differ? Arthritis Rheum 56:2267–2277. doi:10.1002/art.22728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wandel S, Jüni P, Tendal B, Nüesch E, Villiger PM, Welton NJ, Reichenbach S, Trelle S (2010) Effects of glucosamine, chondroitin, or placebo in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: network meta-analysis. BMJ 341:c4675. doi:10.1136/bmj.c4675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Samson DJ, Grant MD, Ratko TA, Bonnell CJ, Ziegler KM, Aronson N (2007) Treatment of primary and secondary osteoarthritis of the knee. Evid Rep Technol Assess 1–157

  14. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) (2008) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee (non-arthroplasty) (1st ed) Illinois: Author. http://www.aaos.org/research/guidelines/oakguideline.pdf

  15. Zhang W, Nuki G, Moskowitz RW, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden NK, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P (2010) OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009. Osteoarthr Cartil 18:476–499. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2010.01.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarnsamak P (2011) FDA to support controversial drugs. The Nation February 24, 2011 12:00 pm http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2011/02/24/national/FDA-to-support-controversial-drugs-30149419.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2011

  17. Danish Medicines Agency (2011) The reimbursement for glucosamine is removed on 28 November 2011. http://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/en/topics/statistics,-prices-and-reimbursement/reimbursement-of-medicines/general-reimbursement/reassessment/news/the-reimbursement-for-glucosamine-is-rem--ember-2011 Accessed 14 November 2011

  18. Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits agency (2011) Glucosamine excluded from the pharmaceutical benefits scheme. http://www.tlv.se/in-english-old/news/glucosamine-excluded-from-the-pharmaceutical-benefits-scheme/ Accessed 14 Nov 2011

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Republic of Korea (NA 2009-04).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang-Cheol Bae.

Additional information

Hyun-Ju Seo and Yoon-Kyoung Sung contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seo, HJ., Sung, YK., Choi, CB. et al. Prevalence and factors affecting glucosamine use in Korea: a survey-based study. Rheumatol Int 33, 1627–1631 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2288-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-2288-x

Keywords

Navigation