Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic analysis of apomictic wine yeasts

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Current Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast IFI256 was selected because of its high fermentative capacity and tolerance to ethanol. Sporulation of the IFI256 strain produced two-spore asci unable to conjugate, but able to sporulate again and the spores produced two-spore asci in all cases. That process was studied for at least five generations. The electrophoretic karyotype showed a pattern of 21 chromosomal bands, which was identical both in the parental and in all the descendants analyzed, from the first to the fifth generation. The DNA content of the parental and the descendants was of 1.7 n, which indicates that the capacity for sporulation shown by all descendants was due to apomixis rather than homothallism of the strain. Different concentrations of glucose and acetate and the addition of zinc salts to the presporulation and sporulation media increased the frequency of four-spore asci by up to 9%. However, the tetrads formed were in fact two dyads that resulted from induced endomitosis. Crosses of IFI256 with laboratory strains produced hybrids giving four-spore asci after sporulation, thus indicating the mutation to be recessive. Transformation of IFI256 with plasmids carrying either SPO12 or SPO13 functional genes and crosses with strains carrying functional or mutated SPO12 and/or SPO13 genes indicated that IFI256 carries several mutations, one of which was located to the SPO12 gene. Parasexual cycles and chromosome loss induced after crossing IFI256 with cir0 strains indicated that apomictic mutations were exclusively located at chromosome VIII. The high frequency of wine strains which are apomictic suggests apomixis to be an advantageous phenotype which allows the formation of stress-resistant asci but prevents the loss of favored chromosomal rearrangements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullah MF, Borts RH (2001) Meiotic recombination frequencies are affected by nutritional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14524–14529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M, Miller JJ (1978) Sporulation in single-spore isolates from amitrole-induced multispored asci of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Can J Microbiol 24:1614–1615

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atcheson CL, Esposito RE (1993) Meiotic recombination in yeast. Curr Opin Genet Dev 3:736–744

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakalinsky AT, Snow R (1990) The chromosomal constitution of wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 6:367–382

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bilinski CA, Casey GP (1989) Developments in sporulation and breeding of brewer’s yeast. Yeast 5:429–438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilinski CA, Miller JJ (1980) Induction of normal ascosporogenesis in two-spored Saccharomyces cerevisiae by glucose, acetate, and zinc. J Bacteriol 143:343–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bilinski CA, Marmiroli N, Miller JJ (1987) Cell division age dependency of meiosis in an apomictic variant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 3:1–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carro D, Garcia-Martinez J, Perez-Ortin JE, Pina B (2003) Structural characterization of chromosome I size variants from a natural yeast strain. Yeast 20:171–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castrejon F, Codon AC, Cubero B, Benitez T (2002) Acetaldehyde and ethanol are responsible for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) in flor yeasts. Syst Appl Microbiol 25:462–467

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Codon AC, Gasent-Ramirez JM, Benitez T (1995) Factors which affect the frequency of sporulation and tetrad formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae baker’s yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:630–638

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Codon AC, Benitez T, Korhola M (1997) Chromosomal reorganization during meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae baker’s yeasts. Curr Genet 32:247–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Codon AC, Benitez T, Korhola M (1998) Chromosomal polymorphism and adaptation to specific industrial environments of Saccharomyces strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 49:154–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conde J, Fink GR (1976) A mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective for nuclear fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:3651–3655

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deng C, Saunders WS (2001) ADY1, a novel gene required for prospore membrane formation at selected spindle poles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 12:2646–2659

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engebrecht J (2003) Cell signaling in yeast sporulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 306:325–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falco SC, Botstein D (1983) A rapid chromosome-mapping method for cloned fragments of yeast DNA. Genetics 105:857–872

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falco SC, Li Y, Broach JR, Botstein D (1982) Genetic properties of chromosomally integrated 2 µm plasmid DNA in yeast. Cell 29:573–584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felder T, Bogengruber E, Tenreiro S, Ellinger A, Sa-Correia I, Briza P (2002) Dtrlp, a multidrug resistance transporter of the major facilitator superfamily, plays an essential role in spore wall maturation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 1:799–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grandin N, Reed SI (1993) Differential function and expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae B-type cyclins in mitosis and meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 13:2113–2125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grether ME, Herskowitz I (1999) Genetic and biochemical characterization of the yeast SPO12 protein. Mol Biol Cell 10:3689–3703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guijo S, Mauricio JC, Salmon JM, Ortega JM (1997) Determination of the relative ploidy in different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used for fermentation and ‘flor’ film ageing of dry sherry-type wines. Yeast 13:101–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henninger W, Emeis CC (1974) The apomictic life-cycle of the multispored strains of the yeast Lipomyces. Arch Microbiol 101:365–377

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Honigberg SM, Purnapatre K (2003) Signal pathway integration in the switch from the mitotic cell cycle to meiosis in yeast. J Cell Sci 116:2137–2147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hugerat Y, Simchen G (1993) Mixed segregation and recombination of chromosomes and YACs during single-division meiosis in SPO13 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 135:297–308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Infante JJ, Dombek KM, Rebordinos L, Cantoral JM, Young ET (2003) Genome-wide amplifications caused by chromosomal rearrangements play a major role in the adaptative evolution of natural yeast. Genetics 165:1745–1759

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito H, Fukuda Y, Murata K, Kimura A (1983) Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol 153:163–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez J, Benitez T (1987) Genetic analysis of highly ethanol-tolerant wine yeasts. Curr Genet 12:421–428

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klapholz S, Esposito RE (1980) Isolation of SPO12-1 and SPO13-1 from a natural variant of yeast that undergoes a single meiotic division. Genetics 96:567–588

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koren A, Ben-Aroya S, Kupiec M (2002) Control of meiotic recombination initiation: a role for the environment? Curr Genet 42:129–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marmiroli N, Bilinski CA (1985) Partial restoration of meiosis in an apomictic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a model system for investigation of nucleo-mitochondrial interactions during sporulation. Yeast 1:39–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez P, Codon AC, Perez L, Benitez T (1995) Physiological and molecular characterization of flor yeasts: polymorphism of flor yeast populations. Yeast 11:1399–1411

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarroll RM, Esposito RE (1994) SPO13 negatively regulates the progression of mitotic and meiotic nuclear division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 138:47–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell AP (1994) Control of meiotic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev 58:56–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakaseko Y, Niwa O, Yanagida M (1984) A meiotic mutant of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe that produces mature asci containing two diploid spores. J Bacteriol 157:334–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naumov GI, Naumova ES, Lantto RA, Louis EJ, Korhola M (1992) Genetic homology between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its sibling species S. paradoxus and S. bayanus: electrophoretic karyotypes. Yeast 8:599–612

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal R, Riles L, Guldener U, Klein S, Johnston M, Hegemann JH (1999) Systematic analysis of S. cerevisiae chromosome VIII genes. Yeast 15:1775–1796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nugroho TT, Mendenhall MD (1994) An inhibitor of yeast cyclin-dependent protein kinase plays an important role in ensuring the genomic integrity of daughter cells. Mol Cell Biol 14:3320–3328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohya Y, Ohsumi Y, Anraku Y (1984) Genetic study of the role of calcium ions in the cell division cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a calcium-dependent mutant and its trifluoperazine-dependent pseudorevertants. Mol Gen Genet 193:389–394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pak J, Segall J (2002) Role of Ndt80, Sum1, and Swe1 as targets of the meiotic recombination checkpoint that control exit from pachytene and spore formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 22:6430–6440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Ortin JE, Querol A, Puig S, Barrio E (2002) Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains. Genome Res 12:1533–1539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce M, Benjamin KR, Montano SP, Georgiadis MM, Winter E, Vershon AK (2003) Sum1 and Ndt80 proteins compete for binding to middle sporulation element sequences that control meiotic gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 23:4814–4825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puig S, Querol A, Barrio E, Perez-Ortin JE (2000) Mitotic recombination and genetic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2057–2061

    Google Scholar 

  • Riles L, Dutchik JE, Baktha A, McCauley BK, Thayer EC, Leckie MP, Braden VV, Depke JE, Olson MV (1993) Physical maps of the six smallest chromosomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at a resolution of 2.6 kilobase pairs. Genetics 134:81–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ristow H, Seyfarth A, Lochmann ER (1995) Chromosomal damages by ethanol and acetaldehyde in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as studied by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Mutat Res 326:165–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sancho ED, Hernandez E, Rodriguez-Navarro A (1986) Presume sexual isolation in yeast populations during production of sherrylike wine. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:395–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah R, Jensen S, Frenz LM, Johnson AL, Johnston LH (2001) The SPO12 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a regulator of mitotic exit whose cell cycle-dependent degradation is mediated by the anaphase-promoting complex. Genetics 159:965–980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman F, Fink GR, Hicks JB (1986) Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.

  • Sora S, Bianchi M (1982) Propranolol, atenolol, and trifluoperazine reduce the spontaneous occurrence of meiotic diploid products in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2:1299–1303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spirek M, Yang J, Groth C, Petersen RF, Langkjaer RB, Naumova ES, Sulo P, Naumov GI, Piskur J (2003) High-rate evolution of Saccharomyces sensu lato chromosomes. FEMS Yeast Res 3:363–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toyn JH, Johnson AL, Johnston LH (1995) Segregation of unreplicated chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a novel G1/M-phase checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 15:5312–5321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu L, Ajimura M, Padmore R, Klein C, Kleckner N (1995) NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 15:6572–6581

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. R.E. Esposito from the University of Chicago, United States, for kindly providing us with strains REE2315, 2374, 2972 and 2986 and plasmids Ycp50, p(SPO13)8 and pSL1, we thank Dr. T.G. Villa from the University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain, for his generous gift of cir0 yeast strains and we thank Pedro Domecq, S.A. (Jerez de la Frontera, Spain) for their technical assistance and for allowing us to carry out sampling under industrial conditions. This research was supported by CICYT project AGL2000-0524, MCyT project VINO1-046-C2-1 and Junta de Andalucía PAI CVI-107

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tahía Benítez.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Hohmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castrejón, F., Martínez-Force, E., Benítez, T. et al. Genetic analysis of apomictic wine yeasts. Curr Genet 45, 187–196 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-004-0486-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-004-0486-8

Keywords

Navigation