Skip to main content
Log in

R0 oder nicht R0 – das ist die Frage

  • Leserbriefe
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Wittekind C, Compton C, Greene F, Sobin L (2002) TNM residual tumor classification revisited. Cancer 94: 2511–2516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wittekind C (2005) persönliche Mitteilung

  3. Wittekind C, Henson D, Hutter R, Sobin L, UICC (2001) TNM Supplement. A commentary for uniform use, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss, New York

  4. Hermanek P, Wittekind C (1994) Diagnostic seminar: the pathologist and the residual tumor (R) classification. Pathol Res Pract 190: 115–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hermanek P, Wittekind C (1994) Residual tumor (R) classification and prognosis. Semin Surg Oncol 10: 12–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wittekind C, Compton CC, Sobin LH (2002) Residual tumor classification revisited. Cancer 94: 2511–2519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wittekind C, Greene FL, Henson DE et al., UICC (2003) TNM supplement. A commentary for uniform use, 3rd edn. Wiley-Liss, New York

  8. Wittekind C, Klimpfinger M, Sobin LH, UICC (2005) TNM-Atlas. Illustrierter Leitfaden zur TNM/pTNM-Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  9. Wittekind C, Meyer HJ, Bootz F, UICC (2002) TNM-Klassifikation maligner Tumoren, 6. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

R0 oder nicht R0 – das ist die Frage. Pathologe 28, 308–311 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-007-0919-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-007-0919-5

Navigation