Skip to main content
Log in

Three stage semelparous Leslie models

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonlinear Leslie matrix models have a long history of use for modeling the dynamics of semelparous species. Semelparous models, as do nonlinear matrix models in general, undergo a transcritical equilibrium bifurcation at inherent net reproductive number R 0 = 1 where the extinction equilibrium loses stability. Semelparous models however do not fall under the purview of the general theory because this bifurcation is of higher co-dimension. This mathematical fact has biological implications that relate to a dichotomy of dynamic possibilities, namely, an equilibration with over lapping age classes as opposed to an oscillation in which age classes are periodically missing. The latter possibility makes these models of particular interest, for example, in application to the well known outbreaks of periodical insects. While the nature of the bifurcation at R 0 = 1 is known for two-dimensional semelparous Leslie models, only limited results are available for higher dimensional models. In this paper I give a thorough accounting of the bifurcation at R 0 = 1 in the three-dimensional case, under some monotonicity assumptions on the nonlinearities. In addition to the bifurcation of positive equilibria, there occurs a bifurcation of invariant loops that lie on the boundary of the positive cone. I describe the geometry of these loops, classify them into three distinct types, and show that they consist of either one or two three-cycles and heteroclinic orbits connecting (the phases of) these cycles. Furthermore, I determine stability and instability properties of these loops, in terms of model parameters, as well as those of the positive equilibria. The analysis also provides the global dynamics on the boundary of the cone. The stability and instability conditions are expressed in terms of certain measures of the strength and the symmetry/asymmetry of the inter-age class competitive interactions. Roughly speaking, strong inter-age class competitive interactions promote oscillations (not necessarily periodic) with separated life-cycle stages, while weak interactions promote stable equilibration with overlapping life-cycle stages. Methods used include the theory of planar monotone maps, average Lyapunov functions, and bifurcation theory techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Behncke H (2000) Periodical cicadas. J Math Biol 40: 413–431

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bulmer MG (1977) Periodical insects. Am Nat 111(982): 1099–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cushing JM (1998) An introduction to structured population dynamics. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, vol 71. SIAM, Philadelphia

  4. Cushing JM (2003) Cycle chains and the LPA model. J Differ Equ Appl 9(7): 655–670

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cushing JM (2006) Nonlinear semelparous Leslie models. Math Biosci Eng 3(1): 17–36

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cushing JM (2008) Matrix models and population dynamics. In: Keener J, Lewis M (eds) Mathematical biology. IAS/Park City Mathematics Series, American Mathematical Society, Providence (to appear)

  7. Cushing JM, Li J (1989) On Ebenman’s model for the dynamics of a population with competing juveniles and adults. Bull Math Biol 51(6): 687–713

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cushing JM, Li J (1991) Juvenile versus adult competition. J Math Biol 29: 457–473

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Cushing JM, Yicang Z (1994) The net reproductive value and stability in structured population models. Nat Resour Model 8(4): 1–37

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cushing JM, Henson SM, Blackburn CC (2007) Multiple mixed-type attractors in competition models. J Biol Dyn 1(4): 347–362

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Davydova NV, Diekmann O, van Gils SA (2003) Year class coexistence or competitive exclusion for strict biennials. J Math Biol 46: 95–131

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Davydova NV, Diekmann O, van Gils SA (2005) On circulant populations. I. The algebra of semelparity. Linear Algebra Appl 398: 185–243

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Diekmann O, Davydova NV, van Gils SA (2005) On a boom or bust year class cycle. J Differ Equ Appl 11: 327–335

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Diekmann O, Wang Y, Yan P (2008) Carrying simplices in discrete competitive systems and age-structured semelparous populations. Discrete Continuous Dyn Syst 20(1): 37–52

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebenman B (1987) Niche differences between age classes and intraspecific competition in age-structured populations. J Theor Biol 124: 25–33

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Ebenman B (1988) Competition between age-classes and population dynamics. J Theor Biol 131: 389–400

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Elaydi SN (2005) An introduction to difference equations, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Heliövaara K, Väisänen R (1986) Bugs in bags: intraspecific competition affects the biogeography of the alternate-year populations of Aradus cinnamomeus (Heteroptera). Oikos 47: 327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heliövaara K, Väisänen R, Simon C (1994) Evolutionary ecology of periodical insects. TREE 9(12): 475–480

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kon R (2005) Nonexistence of synchronous orbits and class coexistence in matrix population models. SIAM J Appl Math 66(2): 616–626

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Kon R (2006) Invasibility of missing year-classes in Leslie matrix models for a semelparous biennial population. In: Proceedings of the Czech–Japanese seminar in applied mathematics, 2005, COE Lecture Note, vol 3. Faculty of Mathematics, Kyushu University, ISSN 1881-4042, pp 64–75

  22. Kon R (2007) Competitive exclusion between year-classes in a semelparous biennial population. In: Deutsch A, Bravo de la Parra R, de Boer R, Diekmann O, Jagers P, Kisdi E, Kretzschmar M, Lansky P, Metz H (eds) Mathematical modeling of biological systems, vol II. Birkhäuser, Boston, pp 79–90

  23. Kon R, Iwasa Y (2007) Single-class orbits in nonlinear Leslie matrix models for semelparous populations. J Math Biol 55(5–6): 781–802

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Kon R, Saito Y, Takeuchi Y (2004) Permanence of single-species stage-structured models. J Math Biol 48: 515–528

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Kulenović M, Merino O (2006) Competitive-exclusion versus competitive-coexistence for systems in the plane. Discrete Continuous Dyn Syst Ser B 6: 1141–1156

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Leslie PH (1945) On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33: 183–212

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Leslie PH (1948) Some further notes on the use of matrices in population mathematics. Biometrika 35: 213–245

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Li C-K, Schneider H (2002) Applications of Perron–Frobenius theory to population dynamics. J Math Biol 44: 450–462

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Mjølhus E, Wikan A, Solberg T (2005) On synchronization in semelparous populations. J Math Biol 50: 1–21

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Neimark Y (1959) On some cases of periodic motions depending on parameters. Doklady Akad NAUK USSR 129: 736–739

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Nisbet RM, Onyiah LC (1994) Population dynamic consequences of competition within and between age classes. J Math Biol 32: 329–344

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Pielou EC (1974) Mathematical ecology. Wiley-Interscience, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pielou EC (1977) Mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sacker RS (1965) A new approach to the perturbation theory of invariant surfaces. Commun Pure Appl Math 18: 717–732

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Silva JAL, Hallam TG (1993) Effects of delay, truncations and density dependence in reproduction schedules on stability of nonlinear Leslie matrix models. J Math Biol 31: 367–395

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith HL (1998) Planar competitive and cooperative difference equations. J Differ Equ Appl 3: 335–357

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Wikan A (1997) Dynamic consequences of reproductive delay in Leslie matrix models with nonlinear survival probabilities. Math Biosci 146: 37–62

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Cushing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cushing, J.M. Three stage semelparous Leslie models. J. Math. Biol. 59, 75–104 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-008-0208-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-008-0208-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation